Ghazwa e badr.What’s 313?
313 Muslims vs 1000 infidels. 1st war of Islam. Victory for Muslims
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ghazwa e badr.What’s 313?
Ghazwa e badr.
313 Muslims vs 1000 infidels. 1st war of Islam. Victory for Muslims
It does look like you need a maths lesson. If you don't want one, that's OK. There is more to waging war then fighting men. Economy is a big component.
To increase the budget, you have to increase taxes. There is already a thread running elsewhere where the IMF has asked to increase taxes and all the Pakistani members are angry about that. So I wonder how much you can increase taxes for the 400000 new recruits.
Oh that, yeah. I was thinking it was some more recent event.
I hate to say it but the only way pakiis gonna wreck havoc over Delhi if enemy thrusts tanks in Lahore and Karachi and disturb their 9-5 office time /life style
or perhaps take away some of the land allotted to generals
In 1971 war, Maj Gen Janjua troops captured area of Chhamb near Tawi River, North west of Jammu. He was commanding 23rd Infantry Division, but he was allotted more troops like 2 x Infantry brigades, 1 x armored Brigade and 2 x artillery Brigades. The operation was a success.@Signalian can u tell about Pakistan 's offensive through Jammu like u started the thread by telling about offensive through Valley
So you want to capture Delhi to win J&K&L?Whoever controls Delhi , controls the IOK. Plain and simple. This is primarily a political question than a military one. Strategically, Kashmir is not some Island in the Indian Ocean which can be won in a war. Therefore, a correct question is required here. Military strategy is much more than offensives and logistics .
I had mentioned airborne/air assault forces in the first post.@Signalian can u tell about Pakistan 's offensive through Jammu like u started the thread by telling about offensive through Valley
You have asked the correct question. Thank you. I would prefer Delhi over Kashmir in any given time if I had the capabilities. A cow always brings cowdung along. Therefore, the primary objective should be the cow. Delhi will be captured at some stage but that requires a totally different Pakistan than the one we see today. People who talks about Kashmir as an isolated island alone, are not to be taken seriously. Kashmir is only a symptom of a far greater problem. Jinnah's Pakistan was meant to be a strategic retreat only. It was never meant to be a permanent solution.So you want to capture Delhi to win J&K&L?
Lol good luck.....You have asked the correct question. Thank you. I would prefer Delhi over Kashmir in any given time if I had the capabilities. A cow always brings cowdung along. Therefore, the primary objective should be the cow. Delhi will be captured at some stage but that requires a totally different Pakistan than the one we see today. People who talks about Kashmir as an isolated island alone, are not to be taken seriously. Kashmir is only a symptom of a far greater problem. Jinnah's Pakistan was meant to be a strategic retreat only. It was never meant to be a permanent solution.
We lack deep & future-oriented strategic thinking,in it's current shape and form Govt of Pakistan along with it principle armed organisation PA won't be able to take Kashmir even in 1000 years.Our thinking and planning pattern needs to be changed,we need a major shift from everything we are doing that.I had mentioned airborne/air assault forces in the first post.
Such forces are required for offensives conducted anywhere against India. Firstly, they are almost non existent other than SSG and few LCBs. Secondly, they require air lift where as transport helis and C-130 are scarce. Thirdly. PAF will need to give them cover as they are being dropped inside India.
There are 4 Armored/Mech Divs but the attack through ground whether armor or foot infantry will take time in entering, fighting and capturing area. Air Borne forces are required for these 4 formations also, not just for Ops in Kashmir mountains. PA needs Airborne/Air assault forces to hold and engage Indian forces inside their own borders so Pakistan Strike Corps can push through inside India and reinforce airborne forces. When pakistan captures some area and brings India on negotiation table, then maybe Kashmir issue might find some solution, but India will never give up kashmir easily ever.
The reserve force that PA has are retired officers/soldiers, they may or may not see combat. Then FC and Rangers are not well trained to fight Indian armored forces, but they could hold on their own against Indian Airborne forces. Fighting on same lines of 65 and 71 will bring same results.
For PA to succeed in every sector PAF will be required, not a mere presence but a strong presence and not just air superiority but constant ground attacks to force Indian forces to retreat and long range interdiction to stop Indian reinforcements and supplies from reaching the affected sectors. This means more than 450 combat aircraft.
So the 5 lakh+ reserve force is actually made of Retired men. Are they physically capable then?The reserve force that PA has are retired officers/soldiers, they may or may not see combat. Then FC and Rangers are not well trained to fight Indian armored forces, but they could hold on their own against Indian Airborne forces. Fighting on same lines of 65 and 71 will bring same results.
Hmmm looks like the job of F16s, JF17s and Mirages. F16s and JF17s can take on A2A role while the rest of the Thunders and Mirages need to bomb the Indian reinforcementsFor PA to succeed in every sector PAF will be required, not a mere presence but a strong presence and not just air superiority but constant ground attacks to force Indian forces to retreat and long range interdiction to stop Indian reinforcements and supplies from reaching the affected sectors. This means more than 450 combat aircraft.
I had mentioned airborne/air assault forces in the first post.
Such forces are required for offensives conducted anywhere against India. Firstly, they are almost non existent other than SSG and few LCBs. Secondly, they require air lift where as transport helis and C-130 are scarce. Thirdly. PAF will need to give them cover as they are being dropped inside India.
There are 4 Armored/Mech Divs but the attack through ground whether armor or foot infantry will take time in entering, fighting and capturing area. Air Borne forces are required for these 4 formations also, not just for Ops in Kashmir mountains. PA needs Airborne/Air assault forces to hold and engage Indian forces inside their own borders so Pakistan Strike Corps can push through inside India and reinforce airborne forces. When pakistan captures some area and brings India on negotiation table, then maybe Kashmir issue might find some solution, but India will never give up kashmir easily ever.
The reserve force that PA has are retired officers/soldiers, they may or may not see combat. Then FC and Rangers are not well trained to fight Indian armored forces, but they could hold on their own against Indian Airborne forces. Fighting on same lines of 65 and 71 will bring same results.
For PA to succeed in every sector PAF will be required, not a mere presence but a strong presence and not just air superiority but constant ground attacks to force Indian forces to retreat and long range interdiction to stop Indian reinforcements and supplies from reaching the affected sectors. This means more than 450 combat aircraft.