New Recruit
I agree to this point. Basically afghan means pashtuns and country is named after them. Pashtuns were always rulers of afghanistan, but they are not now. So they have to give up their stance that they are majority and rest are minorities. In pakistan punjabis dont claim that they are majority and country is their first. Punjabis, pashtuns, balochs and sindhis are considered equal and basic entities of pakistan, bonded by islam. Afghanistan should follow pakistan in this, islam is unifying factor.
jet bombardments can not be as precise as drones are . The bombardments have caused more civilian deaths , ask it from local people of FATA.
New Recruit
New Recruit
Typical Pashtun thinking and understanding of the world. Today, US is de facto ruler. Even during the Taliban Pakistan, the Arabs and Chechens backed Taliban and kept them alive.
why so much hate against pashtuns?. If you were hating talibans ,it would have been understandable, but your hate extends to all pashtuns. As for as i know tajiks are genetically and to some extent culturally close to pashtuns. They share most with each other compared to rest. Extensive intermarraiges occur between tajiks and pashtuns. . As Hazaras are looked down upon (mongoloid, shias). Uzbeks have least to do with afghan identity and are distant from both groups....tajiks dont want division of afghanistan, e-tajiks of tajikam.com like u are few dozens who have grown up on westren countries and spend too much time infront of PC.
Pashtuns are a 35% minority. their fake myth of a majority was claimed by the MUSAHIBAN family without any demographical census. The political and cultural picture of Afghanistan proves it. More than 65% speak Persian as mother-tongue, ca. 22% as second language and 35% speak Pashto. In general, the more allied and united non-Pashtuns outnumber you by far more than you can imagine. Pashtuns did never ruled that country. Even during AHmad Khan Abdali the empire was ruled and administrated by Persian Qizilbashs and Persian Tajiks, by Armenians, Georgians and even Turkmen tribes-men. The Persian administrators and governeuers, the real ruler of his empire up to the time of Abdurrahman Khan when British replaced the Persians, were Qezelbash and Turkish Afshar/Bayat people. The men behind the ''kings''. They made the entire tribe of Ahmad Khan to Tajiki-speaking Sadozais, later the same happened to Mohmmadzais and Barakzaiys through their daughters and women they learned to speak Persian. After Abdurrahman Kahn the British ruled from first hand till Amanullah Khan changed the sides from Anglo-Saxons to the Russians... when did Pashtuns ruled a country? What kind of a rule was it when ''half'' (with the signing and forcing by 200000 Kohistanis on Abdurrrahman) of the Pashtun land became Pakistan or when British and later the Russians, Arabs, Pakistanis .. etc gave orders?
New Recruit
New Recruit
My little unlogical friend, the men behind the throne always ruled. Who gave the order to cleanse many Ghailzai tribes? Whose daughters and childfen became Tajiki-like? Your entire Mohammadzai, Popalzaiy, Yusufzaiy, Barakzai, Ahmadzia, STanikzai and their daughters and their childen.. are not by chance Persian-speakers. Pashtun Kuchis came always to Sart and Deqan families and offered their daughters and women. The Mughals like Babur had more than 72 Pashtana wifes of which 32 were Yusufzais... out of 380 wifes in general, of which most of them were Indian slaves or Rajput princesses. You wanna tell me how history worked? If you really want to know who your ancestors were read the in Afghanistan cesured Tarikhe Ahmadshahi the real history of Ahmad Khan Abdali. The book was written under his own nose by his own court historian. The Mohammadzai women were always gaven to Qezelbash vezirs to build ties with the elitists of the country. The real backer of ''Pashtun'' empire. The court language became Persian and so the sissies lol
New Recruit
let´s see what works 
the Tajik/Persianspeaking Mohammadzai kid wants to tell us how history worked.
