What's new

Pakistan is a fake country,will re-unite with India -Says Justice Katju

Status
Not open for further replies.
I agree no pakistan but at the same time no india as well rather a cluster of different states/nations

Those clusters could very well have formed a federation for all we know and we could have had an even bigger India, so these speculations like if my aunt had a d!ck she'd be my uncle should be put to rest.
 
.
Send this idiot to mental asylum!!
He is another troll in India apart from subramniam swamy!!
 
.
Those clusters could very well have formed a federation for all we know and we could have had an even bigger India, so these speculations like if my aunt had a d!ck she'd be my uncle should be put to rest.
Really it would join up!! Thats a good joke how sure are you that the tamils would want to join the pukhtuns?
 
.
Really it would join up!! Thats a good joke how sure are you that the tamils would want to join the pukhtuns?

Again speculating on things which you never know how they could have have turned out. Sikkim did join the Indian Union by a popular vote incase you didn't know and they have no similarity to a tamil or a punjabi .
 
.
Again speculating on things which you never know how they could have have turned out. Sikkim did join the Indian Union by a popular vote incase you didn't know and they have no similarity to a tamil or a punjabi .
What else could sikkim have done? They had seen tibet and were not willing to risk this. They found india safer than being annexed by china. And btw look at the size and location of sikkim compared to like balochistan or punjab or bengal etc these states could easily run by themseleves sikkim could not
 
.
What else could sikkim have done? They had seen tibet and were not willing to risk this. They found india safer than being annexed by china. And btw look at the size and location of sikkim compared to like balochistan or punjab or bengal etc these states could easily run by themseleves sikkim could not

refer post 91. You never know how things could have turned out in the Indian subcontinent had it not been for the British , so you can put a full stop at your speculations.
 
.
refer post 91. You never know how things could have turned out in the Indian subcontinent had it not been for the British , so you can put a full stop at your speculations.
You are making speculations as well here my friend how can you speculate that the union would have formed? Atleast i can say that when the mughal empire was declining there were several new powers rising who had no aspirations for a united india as there was no such concept! The union concept was made by the british
 
.
Really it would join up!! Thats a good joke how sure are you that the tamils would want to join the pukhtuns?

Pashtuns have nothing to do with our Indian civilization, they are different people from the West of Indus. :wacko:

You are making speculations as well here my friend how can you speculate that the union would have formed? Atleast i can say that when the mughal empire was declining there were several new powers rising who had no aspirations for a united india as there was no such concept! The union concept was made by the british

When Mughals were declining, Marathas replaced them in most of India.
 
.
Pashtuns have nothing to do with our Indian civilization, they are different people from the West of Indus. :wacko:
Take punjabis and tamils then if there was no concept of a union and both were happily separate independent countries why on earth would they join each other? An EU type union might have been possible after fighting each other but a single state noo!!
 
.
That day will come when India and Pakistan will become one country again but remember the authority will be of Muslims. Just wait for Gazwa e Hind
 
Last edited:
.
Pashtuns have nothing to do with our Indian civilization, they are different people from the West of Indus. :wacko:



When Mughals were declining, Marathas replaced them in most of India.
And then we had sikhs and afghanis etc the marathas never got full control of india and if somehow they did even then revolt would have led to parts calling themselves independent this happened alot even during mughal times governors used to declare independence whenever they got the chance
 
.
Take punjabis and tamils then if there was no concept of a union and both were happily separate independent countries why on earth would they join each other? An EU type union might have been possible after fighting each other but a single state noo!!

West Punjabis see themselves connected to Arabs, Turk and Persians, so I know they can't live with Tamils but East Punjabis and Tamils are living together. Honestly, the Punjabis and Pashtuns share nothing in common except a common religion. Pashtun see themselves as conquerors and Punjabis as conquered people. :wacko:

And then we had sikhs and afghanis etc the marathas never got full control of india and if somehow they did even then revolt would have led to parts calling themselves independent this happened alot even during mughal times governors used to declare independence whenever they got the chance

They are actually in control of most of India and Mughals were emperors just by name.
 
.
West Punjabis see themselves connected to Arabs, Turk and Persians, so I know they can't live with Tamils but East Punjabis and Tamils are living together. Honestly, the Punjabis and Pashtuns share nothing in common except a common religion. Pashtun see themselves as conquerors and Punjabis as conquered people. :wacko:



They are actually in control of most of India and Mughals were emperors just by name.
You only say east punjabis would live with tamils because both of them are part of india today so are used to it lets go back when there was no concept of a union and there was no east or west punjab just one united punjab
 
.
You only say east punjabis would live with tamils because both of them are part of india today so are used to it lets go back when there was no concept of a union and there was no east or west punjab just one united punjab

Yes, on what basis you dreamed Punjabi Hindus and Sikhs will live in your Islamic republic created exclusively for Muslims. Anyway, can you tell what a Punjabi or a Pashtun share in common. Many Pashtuns and Balochs says Punjabi and Sindhis are indian by race and only thing they share is a common religion.
 
.
You are making speculations as well here my friend how can you speculate that the union would have formed? Atleast i can say that when the mughal empire was declining there were several new powers rising who had no aspirations for a united india as there was no such concept! The union concept was made by the british

I'm not the one who started the real and fake debate, the people of Indian subcontinent have been Indian for millennia even if there was no concept of nationalism back then we can still look back into the history and say our ancestors were Indian, while you were called Indian by the outside world till 1947 and suddenly took a new identity of Pakstani, hence the identity issues. The concept of nationalism and modern nation state is a rather new concept, atleast we had a common plank of our identity on which we could have envisaged a new nation, what would be of Pakistan had it not been for the British ?
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom