Jango
SENIOR MODERATOR
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2010
- Messages
- 21,530
- Reaction score
- 99
- Country
- Location
same here, can you expand on this tvsram 1992
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Experts(i think so) has said that chinese had contributed technology from flankers and pakistan gave some from what they learned from F16 . So i mentioned J11.
my expansion is nuclearindiasame here, can you expand on this tvsram 1992
JF-17 is co-produced, not only co-designed. The J-10B is co-designed. Big difference. And does India co-produce the MKI??, you had a Russian body of the Su-30, incorported some avionics and canards and whatnot, but you did NOT produce the aircraft from scratch. We did with the JF-17.
Only Pakistan did not produce the JF-17 from scratch. China AND Pakistan produced it. If you are repeatedly failing to comprehend this statement, then god bless you.
Experts(i think so) has said that chinese had contributed technology from flankers and pakistan gave some from what they learned from F16 . So i mentioned J11.
I think j11 are chinese flanker variants with their components.
---------- Post added at 08:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:38 PM ----------
my expansion is nuclearindia
stop commenting personally
any one can see ur views are self contradicting and out of frustation u are saying
I literally beg the senior members on the forum to please detail the components which have been created, developed and integratedby Pakistani R&D Labs into the JF-17 or the J-10B so as to put this debate to rest.
Both planes are capable multi-role fighters and engineers and scientists from Pakistan need to be duly congratulated for their contribution and achievement in this field wherever it exists.
New Recruit
The contribution of Pakistani engineers have been detailed many times on the JF17 thread, the problem is either you guys are too lazy to search for it or simply dont want to believe what has been said. Here's a brain teaser for you, look at what the state of the platform for JF17 was when Pakistan was not involved and how it transformed when Pakistan became involved with the project.
As of right now we dont know the extent of the involvement of Pakistani engineers with FC20, but you can be damn sure that it is there. There is a reason why a whole contingent of PAF is based at Chengdu, the Chinese opened up a Halal restaurant in the food cafeteria just to accommodate our boys.
Are you implying that if Pakistan did not join the project, the JF17 would have never reached it's current state? China has the J10B, J11B, and J20. JF17 is a toy in comparison. I appreciate being proud of one's nation but being blind to common sense and facts is not very healthy.
Pakistan's contribution to the JF17 is well noted. Mostly, it was financial, hundreds of millions of dollars. And secondly, they made a "wish list" to Chinese engineers and China complied.
LOL..so because there is a Halal restaurant, this is some proof that Pakistan is now helping to design the J10B? You guys are hilarious.
Are you implying that if Pakistan did not join the project, the JF17 would have never reached it's current state? China has the J10B, J11B, and J20. JF17 is a toy in comparison. I appreciate being proud of one's nation but being blind to common sense and facts is not very healthy.
Pakistan's contribution to the JF17 is well noted. Mostly, it was financial, hundreds of millions of dollars. And secondly, they made a "wish list" to Chinese engineers and China complied.
LOL..so because there is a Halal restaurant, this is some proof that Pakistan is now helping to design the J10B? You guys are hilarious.
i think the name super 7 was better than jf17The project in the initial stages was the Super 7, than it turned into JF17 once PAF got involved with the project. PAF brought its huge experience of operating the F16 and our pilots operating other foreign platforms. The Chinese would have no idea how Western platforms operate and perform if it were not for the PAF. The Chinese have made huge strides in the aviation section, and PAF's input played a key role in it.
.
Are you implying that if Pakistan did not join the project, the JF17 would have never reached it's current state? China has the J10B, J11B, and J20. JF17 is a toy in comparison. I appreciate being proud of one's nation but being blind to common sense and facts is not very healthy.
Pakistan's contribution to the JF17 is well noted. Mostly, it was financial, hundreds of millions of dollars. And secondly, they made a "wish list" to Chinese engineers and China complied.
LOL..so because there is a Halal restaurant, this is some proof that Pakistan is now helping to design the J10B? You guys are hilarious.
i think the name super 7 was better than jf17
The name was super or they must have kept super 17i think the name super 7 was better than jf17
So you are saying that China and pakistan making a A/C from scratch with 50/50 involvement and stakes does not count as an aircraft made by Pakistan??
NO
I am saying
F-16->Israeli's --> knowledge--> J-10
F-16->Pakistani's--> knowledge-->J-10
It doesnt matter on whether Pakistan was trained as much as the Israeli's.
What does matter is that we were familiar with the F-16 and the new ideas involved in it.
Moreover.. we had experience on all that was good in the F-16... we passed on all that we thought was good about it which every other fighter should have.
Call it setting a benchmark.
PAF has a lot of experience with Western fighters like block52+ while China has a lot of experience with Russian aircrafts like su-30mkm.There are certain things Russians are best at while certain things US is best at so both can share there experiences in order to provide the input of positivities both origins of aircraft had resulting into new breed .
Experts(i think so) has said that chinese had contributed technology from flankers and pakistan gave some from what they learned from F16 . So i mentioned J11.
I think j11 are chinese flanker variants with their components.
its not my opinion, see comments on post #238 , so i thought why not it can be .The J-11 and J-10 are of completely different classes. Hence their designs are different. It's like comparing an F-15 to an F-16.