Pakistan huffs and puffs over US support for India in Afghanistan and Kashmir

[Brickwall]

The UN took the nonsense in Pakistan's one, and corrected it. If it's from the UN, it's reliable. They used the same methods they use for every other country.

The fact is, my source is right and proves India is far from being better than Pakistan.

I didn't knew UN had magical power of creating sense from nonsense

Guess they used it more often there will be peace in the world

 

[maximuswarrior]

LOL at the source: http://idrw.org/pakistan-huffs-puffs-us-support-india-afghanistan-kashmir/#more-104171

At least have some shame before posting such garbage. This is shameless chest thumping.

 

[Dzz]

LOL at the source: http://idrw.org/pakistan-huffs-puffs-us-support-india-afghanistan-kashmir/#more-104171

At least have some shame before posting such garbage. This is shameless chest thumping.

idrw>>>>>all pak media combined

At least they won't report retarded news on national pride because of the shape of a clouds in a another country .

 

[maximuswarrior]

idrw>>>>>all pak media combined

At least they won't report retarded news on national pride because of the shape of a clouds in a another country .

At least we do it on our own media. Not like Indians who act tough on a discussion forum of another nation. This is just rude and no class at all.

 

[Dzz]

At least we do it on our own media. Not like Indians who act tough on a discussion forum of another nation. This is just rude and no class at all.

I like how you connected Pakistans biggest national multi million $ telecast franchise in the same tier as few 100 $ site that provides a international forum platform.

For the record to me you are nothing but a another random 4 sectioned IP address , your national "pride" means nothing here in the net.anyone who can't handle constructive banters has no business in a any social medium , seriously lurk the web more .

 

[alpha q]

So

Jumping in Afghanistan is the dumbest move India could make... (other than selecting Modi as their PM and then terrorism and Kashmir)

so far all these so called mistakes are working out fine for us, you guys watch your back, just imagine India holding posts on both side of yours and too close to your lifeline CPEC.

Bha

If India bring his whole army in afg they will not gain success
Nato will never leave they didn't came here to go back
They will keep there presence in afg and soon u will see in India
taliban are already in power with out pak help if pak do then they will control sooner but pak is neutral if nato leave they will back with bang
Remember the golden words of my role model
The great boss of his tym Gen HAMEED GULL
9/11 bahana hai
Afg thikana hai
Pakistan nishana hai

bhaijaan matlab kehna kya chahte ho???

Half bake Analysis by teenager who turned his bed into Wet

And whats wrong with what he said?

USA history suggest who ever she makes ally at the end USA make them their enemy as well india has to be careful

How does European nations, Japan Canada and others fit in your equation? Us is smart chap, US just knows how to pluck a thorn with a thorn (read Pakistan)

 

[X-2.]

So
so far all these so called mistakes are working out fine for us, you guys watch your back, just imagine India holding posts on both side of yours and too close to your lifeline CPEC.

Bha
bhaijaan matlab kehna kya chahte ho???


And whats wrong with what he said?

Means India will lose if he start being on place of USA or nato
Training or helping afg are fine but deploying soldiers and keep doing proxy wars against pak will destabilis India itself
Means stop Randi Rona

 

[alpha q]

Afghanistan who ever intervention in the Afghan territory has gone in mess Pakistan learned it india is after USSR USA and pakistan gonna dig hole for herself

This is bs, US literally controls Afghanistan how you are saying US turned into mess in af is beyond my knowledge

Means India will lose if he start being on place of USA or nato
Training or helping afg are fine but deploying soldiers and keep doing proxy wars against pak will destabilis India itself
Means stop Randi Rona

Literally civilized behaviour and mature chats are impossible with your lot. Go take your filthy language somewhere else b***h.

 

[Jackdaws]

Published August 11, 2016
SOURCE: FIRSTPOST

Pakistan is exposing its fundamental insecurity by admonishing the US for keeping quiet about Kashmir and encouraging India to boost aid to Afghanistan. After years of catering to its ‘Global War on Terror’ ally Pakistan, the US is batting for India providing greater security assistance to Afghanistan. This hasn’t gone down well with Pakistan.

Pakistani English language daily The Nation reported that Islamabad had warned the Barack Obama administration that “preferring New Delhi over Islamabad could hamper the global campaign against terror”.

According to the daily, Pakistan is smarting after US State Department Deputy Spokesman Mark Toner asked Pakistan to act against terror groups targeting its neighbours and not just the ones that pose a threat to it, alleging Pakistan was going after terror groups ‘selectively’.

Pakistan, of course, believes India has been filling the ears of US State Department officials, but it fails to see that it is its own worst enemy. It has failed abysmally to root out militants from its notoriously lawless tribal region, which runs for more than 500 miles along the rugged Afghan border. It is well documented that North and South Waziristan harbour a sort of rogue’s gallery of Al-Qaeda, Taliban and other Islamic militants.

Admittedly, it’s been a tough month already for Pakistan: On 3 August, the Pentagon withheld $300 million in military assistance to Pakistan, in a sign of ongoing US frustration with Islamabad for not acting against militants fuelling violence in Afghanistan. Defence Secretary Ashton Carter had decided against making a certification to Congress citing the continuing operations of the Afghan Taliban and Haqqani militants on Pakistani soil.

The Obama administration is now grappling with deteriorating security in Afghanistan, where a resurgence in Taliban activity has derailed plans to definitively end the long US military effort there.

Pakistan’s interests are completely different from those of India in Afghanistan. Islamabad wants the return of some variant of the Taliban so that they can again use Afghanistan as a launching pad for jihadi attacks against India, especially in Kashmir.

“The US should also be unalterably opposed to this because it poses a threat to American national security. Let us not forgot that the Times Square bomber was trained in the Af-Pak region,” said South Asia expert Sumit Ganguly, who holds the Rabindranath Tagore Chair in Indian Cultures and Civilisations at Indiana University in Bloomington.

When the India-hating Taliban ruled Afghanistan from 1996 until December 2001, Pakistani militant groups based out of Afghanistan launched frequent cross-border attacks on Kashmir. India was in all kinds of trouble when Pakistan-based Harkat-ul-Mujahideen terrorists hijacked an Indian Airlines flight on 24 December 1999 and took it to Kandahar airport in southern Afghanistan. The eight-day hijack drama ended only after India freed three high-profile Kashmiri separatist prisoners.

Despite its generous aid to Kabul, New Delhi has backed off from a more explicitly military option in Afghanistan. It has deferred to Pakistani sensitivities about raising India’s strategic profile in Afghanistan. However, Prime MinisterNarendra Modi has reached out to the Afghan government, helping with institution building and supplying MI-25 attack helicopters. The two countries have signed a strategic partnership agreement.

While agreeing that Pakistan has raised concerns about India’s growing role in Afghanistan, a top US commander on Wednesday welcomed New Delhi’s participation in strengthening Afghan forces.

“The tremendous cooperation India has made in the human capital of Afghan security forces is the one contribution that is going to be enduring,” General John William Nicholson, Commander of the US Forces in Afghanistan, said on Wednesday in New Delhi.

Nicholson was referring to the training provided by India to Afghan soldiers. According to Indian strategists, India does not need an explicitly military option in Afghanistan. All New Delhi needs to do is to train the Afghan army by bringing contingents over to India where it has extensive training facilities which are lying idle. India is doing a little bit of this but should ramp it up. India must do everything to ensure post-war Afghanistan does not have an ascendant Taliban that can threaten India’s stability by sponsoring Islamic militancy.

Nicholson added that Afghanistan’s military requires more aircraft: “The Afghan Air Force needs to expand. We are concerned about making it sustainable, so that they can maintain the aircraft, and get their parts in time.”

Washington also broadly supports India and Afghanistan signing a deal with Tehran for a transport corridor opening up a new route to Afghanistan via the Iranian port of Chabahar, as it outflanks the $46 billion China-Pakistan economic corridor project with Gwadar as its focal point.

Some US senators were caught off guard by the announcement of the Chabahar port deal in May, but the Obama administration has batted for India.

“For India to be able to contribute to the economic development of Afghanistan, it needs access that it does not readily have across its land boundary. India is seeking to deepen its energy relationship with the Central Asian countries and looking for routes that would facilitate that,” assistant secretary of state for South Asia Nisha Desai Biswal earlier told the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee when Modi signed the high-profile India-Iran Chabahar port deal three months ago.
http://idrw.org/pakistan-huffs-puffs-us-support-india-afghanistan-kashmir/#more-104171

I love the direct Punjabi to English transliteration of kaan bharna to "filling their ears".

 

[Hamza913]

I didn't knew UN had magical power of creating sense from nonsense

Guess they used it more often there will be peace in the world

There's no point talking to you if your going to deny what is considered fact.

 

[Super Falcon]

This is bs, US literally controls Afghanistan how you are saying US turned into mess in af is beyond my knowledge


Literally civilized behaviour and mature chats are impossible with your lot. Go take your filthy language somewhere else b***h.

USA don't have any control in Afghanistan

Taliban has majority of control

USA given financial control to India

If it was USA who had control in Afghanistan than why weapons bought by india for ANA

fact is usa don't want to waste any money on Afghanistan now so she needed mad dog like india whom USA can make fool to invest and show them wet dreams of destroying Pakistan and China together

Fact is usa want to have a minimum base there as she does in middle East

USA don't have any control

 

[alpha q]

USA don't have any control in Afghanistan

Taliban has majority of control

USA given financial control to India

If it was USA who had control in Afghanistan than why weapons bought by india for ANA

fact is usa don't want to waste any money on Afghanistan now so she needed mad dog like india whom USA can make fool to invest and show them wet dreams of destroying Pakistan and China together

Fact is usa want to have a minimum base there as she does in middle East

USA don't have any control

So if US were so bad why the hell yoor country was acting like b***h in the heat to lap up the opportunity to control af? Just butt hurt or bitten by mad dog yeah?

 

[Brickwall]

There's no point talking to you if your going to deny what is considered fact.

What fact, your fact is measured on data which itself is questionable.

Most important no one forced you to talk....

 

[Hamza913]

What fact, your fact is measured on data which itself is questionable.

Most important no one forced you to talk....

If your going to go on that basis, then guess what? All the data about India is questionable too. Not only that, but all the data about almost every country ever, is questionable.

So you either accept what the rest of the world considers fact, or deny it due to incredibly naive reasons.

 

[Brickwall]

If your going to go on that basis, then guess what? All the data about India is questionable too. Not only that, but all the data about almost every country ever, is questionable.

So you either accept what the rest of the world considers fact, or deny it due to incredibly naive reasons.

Buddy data I questioned is based on census of your country, you tell me if country has not taken proper census for more than 2 decades and does comparison on guess estimate how can we trust the data.