saiyan0321
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 6,455
- Reaction score
- 121
- Country
- Location
Lol, so they asked the government to do nothing, because that list is a whole bunch of nothing.
The one thing that would have an impact is the kicking out of the french ambassador (which I oppose), and they couldn't even get the government to agree to that.
That's hilarious.
The greater the magnitude of the protests the higher the demands are made or accepted and this proportionality stands true in reverse as well. Anyhow the government wont lead the ban. They will simply allow the traders to take action for ban on whether they want to or not. The government will neither enforce nor take part in it.
The decision is gonna be that it wont even be brought up in the agenda of NA and the assembly will be busy pointing fingers at the incumbent government on rigging elections and the incumbent government will state that the opposition are sore losers. This kick out French ambassador will not happen and these 'Extremists' will find something new to protest on in the future especially considering that the CII announced that a Temple in Islamabad is fine so they will also move their interest on it. FYI FIA is actually doing that already under the Pakistan Electronics Crime Act 2016 and the CyberCrime Bill 2017. So another useless demandThe decision is gonna be "no, let's not kick out the ambassador", I'm telling you, that's what's going to happen.