Sale of agricultural land to foreigners: move fraught with serious repercussions
ARTICLE (May 05 2009): The Ministry of Investment has decided to offer one million acres of farmland for long-term investment or sale to the foreigners and emirates investment group is in the process of acquiring farmland in Pakistan to export more food to the Gulf region.
Apparently, the decision looks continuation of privatisation process similar to selling shares of PTCL, DFIs, banks and other state enterprises or attracting foreign investment, but if seen in-depth and historical perspective, this can have serious repercussions in future. Selling one million acres of farmland means once again inviting East India Company to our country.
It is due to the sale of Kashmir to the Dogra Maharaja that Kashmiris were deprived of freedom despite the fact that the State of Jammu and Kashmir was having an overwhelming majority of Muslim population in 1846 when Amritsar Treaty was signed and it was having 95% Muslim population in 1947 and there was no reason as to why it should not become part of Pakistan.
Despite the fact Jammu and Kashmir was contiguous to the area which was declared Pakistan in 1947, but due to the Maharaja Hari Singh's dishonest act Kashmiris could not reap the fruit of freedom. Selling of farmland is in fact selling of homeland and can give birth to many evils. It can create security risks for the country.
As Emirates Group is looking for international partner and total land available for sale is one million acres, as such, our enemies can manage to become partners or individual buyers directly or indirectly. The history has recorded the biggest blunder of Palestinians when they sold land to Jews and gradually rich Jews took their land and Israel appeared on the world map.
The authorities are requested to kindly read the history and see how Israel managed to capture the land of Palestinians and appeared as an independent country on the world map. Palestinians are the victims of their own mistake and Israeli has become permanent pain in their neck.
The decision to offer farmland of one million acres to foreigners is far away from foresight and vision and is only to draw short term gains at the cost of selling the homeland.
THE JURISTS HAVE DEFINED CONTENTS OF A STATE AS UNDER:-
1- Land
2- Population on land
3- Unanimous decision of people about their right and obligations (constitutions)
4- Body to implement the constitution and control the state (government) with legislation and judiciary as part of it. Human population on a piece of land is the basic requirement to form a state.
On world map we can see the countries whose area is less than one million acres. The decision to sell one million acres of farmland can prove extremely dangerous in the long run.
Pakistan allowed some foreigners in tribal areas to fight against Russia and these foreigners were allowed to reside in these areas without proper immigration documents and passports, as a result these foreign elements have become the greatest threat for the country and our government has failed to send them back to their native countries.
These so-called Mujahideen occupied some area of our tribal region (less than one million acres) and despite the Drone attacks, both USA and Pakistan have failed to get rid of these people who are not only a threat to Pakistan, but for whole world.
It is known to every one that Usama Bin Laden, Baitullah Mahsud and others were having free movement in Afghanistan before 9/11 and a few years before they were allies of USA in the war against Russia. Now Baitullah Mahsud accepts the responsibility of all suicidal bomb attacks in Pakistan while living in tribal areas of Pakistan, ie, on our land.
While selling the land we always keep in our mind its lithosphere only and are not aware of natural resources like gas, oil and other minerals under it. The land at Sui in Balochistan may look barren to our eyes, but who knew that it carried trillions of cubic feet of gas under it. Similarly, barren areas of Sindh are rich in minerals.
Pakistan discovered the world's largest coal reserves in Thar. We may need foreign exchange to meet our requirements to import our luxuries, but it would be immodest and cruel to our future generations. The concept should be that we have not inherited the homeland from our forefathers but merely borrowed it from our children. Our future generations would never forgive us for this mistake which amounts to spoiling their future.
By selling one million acres of land we will introduce new type of feudalism and create relative deprivation in the area which can spoil the future of our sons of the soil, who are already victims of our short-sightedness. Pundit Nehru, the first Prime Minister of India, introduced land reforms in India and feudalism was buried once and for all and total land divided among landless farmers.
As a result, the per-acre yield in India is much more that what we get in Pakistan. The decision of selling farmland may result into corruption and future scandals.
There are many other options to utilise this land and some of these are: Instead of selling the government should offer such land on 30 years lease, secondly, the farmland may be offered to domestic investors on comparatively easy terms. Thirdly, government may distribute this land among landless farmers and help them to cultivate the same.
Instead of selling land it would be better to sell its yield to the people in the Gulf region. The countries with food and water resources have a great future provided they don't sell their land and water for short-term gains. It is surprising why the media has been silent on this issue of national importance. The issue must be discussed in the parliament before making any deal with any foreign groups.
If the authorities are bent upon selling the land, then it would be better to lease it so that Pakistan has a right on its land to get it back after the expiry of the lease period like Hong Kong and Macao who remained under foreign occupation for more than 99 years and were returned to China after the expiry of the lease deed which China was forced to sign after its defeat in the opium war.
For the utilisation of such land the government should prefer local investors and poor landless farmers and support them in cultivation of land to increase our GDP and per capita income. Finally, government can easily assess the population growth in the country in coming years and our country would be needing more and more cultivated area to feed our own population, rather than feeding other nations.
This issue is full of adversities and needs caution and thorough discussion in parliament before signing any such deal. Availability of land is a great fortune in our hands and the same can become misfortune if sold to foreigners.
Business Recorder [Pakistan's First Financial Daily]