NEW YORK (April 03 2009): US policy on Afghanistan must focus on Pakistan, strengthening civilian government and ending the use of militant groups as an instrument of foreign policy, according to a report by a think tank with close ties to the Obama administration.
The Asia Society, whose chairman was Richard Holbrooke until he was appointed US special envoy on Afghanistan and Pakistan in January, convened a task force of former government officials and academics to compile the report titled "Back from the Brink? A Strategy for Stabilising Afghanistan-Pakistan."
The report, made public on Thursday, was provided to President Barack Obamas administration before he unveiled his new strategy on Afghanistan last week. Task force co-chair Barnett Rubin said the United States and its allies had for too long focused on Afghanistan while allowing problems to fester in Pakistan, where the weak civilian government has little control over tribal areas that have become safe havens for al Qaeda. "The regional center of gravity of the problem is not in Afghanistan," Rubin said. The report argues that there are no al Qaeda bases in Afghanistan, but many in Pakistan where a variety of other militant groups have long thrived on covert backing from the military and intelligence apparatus.
"Because it faces India, which it sees as an enemy ... Pakistan has adopted formally the use of Jihadi groups as instruments of their foreign policy," Rubin said at a panel discussion in New York on the report.
"One of the aims of our regional diplomacy should be to use all the resources we can to encourage, cajole, force, persuade Pakistan to change its policy away from using those Jihadis." Essential to that would be meeting Pakistans legitimate security concerns, the report said, and easing tensions with India. Relations between the nuclear-armed rivals were strained further by Novembers attacks in Mumbai, which India says were conducted with the involvement of Pakistani state agencies.
RISK OF ECONOMIC COLLAPSE The economic crisis risked further weakening Pakistans government, the report said. "Perhaps the most urgent priority is to prevent economic collapse which could undermine state authority even in major urban areas in the next few months."
It cited estimates that halting the economic decline in Pakistan might require a five-year package of $40 billion to $50 billion, a sum that dwarfs Pakistans existing $7.6 billion International Monetary Fund bailout. It urged Washington to work through the United Nations to mobilise donors to find the money. The report mirrors much of Obamas policy, while focusing more on politics than military issues.
British diplomat Paddy Ashdown, who was turned down by President Hamid Karzai as a UN envoy to Afghanistan last year, told the panel that resolving the problems of Pakistan might require a fundamental change of approach because help from Western powers would never be welcome. Drawing parallels to a Saudi initiative to reach out to the Taliban in Afghanistan, Ashdown said it might be time to consider "Islamicising" the approach to helping Pakistan regain control of all of its territory.