Humble Analyst
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- May 17, 2015
- Messages
- 1,522
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Even if it is true which it is not what difference it makesname any Mukti Bahini leader who was not a member of the Pakistani government
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Even if it is true which it is not what difference it makesname any Mukti Bahini leader who was not a member of the Pakistani government
Attempt to make Pakistan sad..but message is loud and clear from Pak foreign office.For those of you who aren't familiar with the vernacular, "deeply saddened" is diplomatic code-speak for, "We don't care enough to do anything of substance, but we will pretend we care anyway."
What else she got to get Pak attention...?...still lucky to be in Pakistan...The traitor's daughter has just one trick up her sleeve and that is extra judicial killings
The "don't really care" nature of the response is reinforced by repeated usage of the word "should" in the statement.Attempt to make Pakistan sad..but message is loud and clear from Pak foreign office.
For those of you who aren't familiar with the vernacular, "deeply saddened" is diplomatic code-speak for, "We don't care enough to do anything of substance, but we will pretend we care anyway."
This is so barbaric from Indian backed regime of shame on themPakistan 'deeply saddened' over Dhaka's execution of Jamaat leader Mir Quasem Ali
SYED SAMMER ABBAS — PUBLISHED 4 MINUTES AGO
1 COMMENT
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan is "deeply saddened" over Bangladesh's execution of wealthy tycoon and top Jamaat-e-Islami financier Mir Quasem Ali for "alleged crimes committed before December 1971 through a flawed judicial process", Foreign Office (FO) Spokesman Nafees Zakaria said on Sunday.
Bangladesh hanged Ali on Saturday for alleged war crimes. The key Jamaat-e-Islami leader was convicted in November 2014 of a series of crimes committed during the 1971 independence conflict, including the abduction and murder of a young fighter.
"The act of suppressing the Opposition through flawed trials is completely against the spirit of democracy," Zakaria said.
Ali is the last prominent JI leader to face execution. Five opposition leaders including four JI leaders have been executed for war crimes since 2013.
"Ever since the beginning of the trials, several international organisations, human rights groups, and international legal figures have raised objections to the court proceedings, especially regarding fairness and transparency, as well as harassment of lawyers and witnesses representing the accused," he said.
"The government of Bangladesh should uphold its commitment, as per the Tripartite Agreement of 1974, wherein it 'decided not to proceed with the trials as an act of clemency'," Zakaria said, adding that "recriminations for political gains are counter-productive".
"Pakistan believes that matters should be addressed with a forward-looking approach in the noble spirit of reconciliation," he said, adding that Pakistan offers its deepest condolences to the bereaved family members.
Mir Quasem Ali was said to be a key commander of the Al-Badr militia in the southern port city of Chittagong during the 1971 war, and later became a shipping and real estate tycoon.
His son Mir Ahmed Bin Quasem, who was part of his legal defence team, was allegedly abducted by security forces earlier in August, which critics say was an attempt to sow fear and prevent protests against the imminent execution.
The Jamaat-e-Islami, which is banned from contesting elections has labelled the charges against Ali “false” and accusing the government of exacting “political vengeance”.
Past convictions and executions of high-profile JI leaders have triggered violence in Bangladesh, which is polarised along political lines.
A tragedy for the person killed, no doubt. But that doesn't mean it can't also be justice.Killing someone for political reason after 40 years is quite tragic
What justice?A tragedy for the person killed, no doubt. But that doesn't mean it can't also be justice.
What justice?
The prosecutors have little to no evidence/proof at all.
Both sides "committed" atrocities - but only one side is being punished (many of whom had nothing to do with it).
This is just a political tool being used to purge all rivals of the AL (current ruling party).
no they killed innocent West Pakistani citizens, loyal bengalis and raped their remaining familiesyes Mukti Bahini was a terrorist..they killed some good rapists
New Recruit
Even if it is true which it is not what difference it makes
When large umber of people carry out extra judicial killings targeting a certain population it is called murders and ethnic cleansing.When large numbers of government employees defect government does not exist