Pakistan decalres Hafiz Saeed a terrorist

[El Sidd]

Suspects were arrested, the case is still going on.

so if history is anything to go by one of the suspects will eventually become Prime Minister of India???

 

[Chhatrapati]

so if history is anything to go by one of the suspects will eventually become Prime Minister of India???

Never going to happen. The current Prime Minister of India was cleared of charges by SIT appointed by the supreme court. He was not a suspect in the investigation. Reading a bit can help you understand how things went.

 

[El Sidd]

Never going to happen. The current Prime Minister of India was cleared of charges by SIT appointed by the supreme court. He was not a suspect in the investigation. Reading a bit can help you understand how things went.

oh the infallible aryan theory

yes yes

 

[Chhatrapati]

oh the infallible aryan theory

yes yes

Indeed the Supreme Court is conscientious than any other government organization.

 

[El Sidd]

Indeed the Supreme Court is conscientious than any other government organization.

supreme court should not be a government organization to begin with but i really do not care what happens in India

 

[Dash]

supreme court should not be a government organization to begin with but i really do not care what happens in India

The gruelling Supreme Court and vengeful congress who soooo badly wanted to see him behind bars so desperate you can’t imagine.

Still that man came out clean. The Supreme Court of India is one that is purely anti government aaaaall the time.

So much so that even government current and previous accuse SC of overstepping their boundary.

A small example of how independent it is.

The CJI is not appointed by GOI. They do it themselves and one attempt was made by the govt to influence the appointment of the judges but SC declared it UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

Period

 

[El Sidd]

The CJI is not appointed by GOI. They do it themselves and one attempt was made by the govt to influence the appointment of the judges but SC declared it UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

i have read both Pakistani and Indian constitution. It is infact UNCONSTITUTIONAL

but for a majority driven BJP. how hard is it to make new laws? after all in the Indian democracy, parliament is the supreme authority? is it not?

we cannot do that. We have like a clause which says God is.

 

[Dash]

i have read both Pakistani and Indian constitution. It is infact UNCONSTITUTIONAL

but for a majority driven BJP. how hard is it to make new laws? after all in the Indian democracy, parliament is the supreme authority? is it not?

we cannot do that. We have like a clause which says God is.

No. Parliament is the supreme authority when it comes to matters related to “governance”

SC is the supreme authority when it comes to upholding the constitution.

Parliament can make any law but that law will face the scrutiny of SC in regards to its constitutional validity. All the time .

There is a difference.

 

[El Sidd]

No. Parliament is the supreme authority when it comes to matters related to “governance”

SC is the supreme authority when it comes to upholding the constitution.

Parliament can make any law but that law will face the scrutiny of SC in regards to its constitutional validity. All the time .

There is a difference.

i understand that but there is a clause there which simply put says conflict of interest in such terms.....

with the majority currently Modi enjoys. Best time for constitutional reforms but sadly the minority appeasing Congress will never let it happen.

 

[Dash]

i understand that but there is a clause there which simply put says conflict of interest in such terms.....

with the majority currently Modi enjoys. Best time for constitutional reforms but sadly the minority appeasing Congress will never let it happen.

You are digressing and getting confused at the same time.

When it comes to law even a full majority govt can be challenged about anything and absolutely.

Govt is not absolute. And the law is designed in such way that conflict must arise. It’s a MUST.

Otherwise how will you address it? Through constitution.

If you are interested to know more just inbox me. I will share some terrific examples. I won’t mind it for a seeker like you.

 

[El Sidd]

You are digressing and getting confused at the same time.

When it comes to law even a full majority govt can be challenged about anything and absolutely.

Govt is not absolute. And the law is designed in such way that conflict must arise. It’s a MUST.

Otherwise how will you address it? Through constitution.

If you are interested to know more just inbox me. I will share some terrific examples. I won’t mind it for a seeker like you.

i will definitely take up on the offer.

 

[Arsalan 345]

Indians are not the largest users. The point is, that's how TTP and other organizations get their funding, your establishment goes the easy way and blame India instead of taking actions.
We are arresting those facilitators in these cowardly attacks by LeT terrorists.
We can deal with people from the inside, we don't have to deal with your country. Nobody unless Pakistan calls Jadhav terrorist and that's a matter of another thread. India may be doing something in return, we can't just let you do this in Kashmir. You got one Kulbushan Yadav, we have hundreds of Pakistani's infiltrating to India. Many getting killed, recently nephew of Masood Azhar was killed along with two other Pak terrorists. Now, how many Indian terrorists are killed in Pakistan soil. Have some shame.


Suspects were arrested, the case is still going on.

terrorist? it is according to your definition.according to our definition, your army are targeting muslims in the valley which is still disputed and not indian part.have some shame.there are graves in kashmir which nobody can even recognize.your army killed muslims in kashmir and you calling us terrorist.i am not surprised over rising number of attacks.why would we care about indian soldiers if they kill our brothers.kashmir is not your part according to un resolution.it's still disputed.and yadhav was a serving naval officer.do you think we are fools!he is the shining example of extremist hindu india.kashmir is not part of india.you can say it but it's still disputed.

 

[Solomon2]

So let me get this straight: Pakistan now considers Saeed a terrorist not because parliament passed a new law, not because the authorities have gathered new evidence, but because its president changed an existing law without consulting parliament? How often does Pakistan's president do this?

 

[Chhatrapati]

terrorist? it is according to your definition.according to our definition, your army are targeting muslims in the valley which is still disputed and not indian part.have some shame.there are graves in kashmir which nobody can even recognize.your army killed muslims in kashmir and you calling us terrorist.i am not surprised over rising number of attacks.why would we care about indian soldiers if they kill our brothers.kashmir is not your part according to un resolution.it's still disputed.and yadhav was a serving naval officer.do you think we are fools!he is the shining example of extremist hindu india.kashmir is not part of india.you can say it but it's still disputed.

I didn't call you anything. I'm calling terrorist as whoever takes arms against India infiltrate to India, destroy lives, for the sake of Pakistan. Yeah, they are terrorists. At least there are people outside Pakistan who believe they are terrorists. That's what we wanted. Now, rest of the blabbering I'll ignore. Such things are way off topic.

So let me get this straight: Pakistan now considers Saeed a terrorist not because parliament passed a new law, not because the authorities have gathered new evidence, but because its president changed an existing law without consulting parliament? How often does Pakistan's president do this?

I don't think it's a new law. But, he added UNSC designated terrorist to his own countries list of terrorists and banned organization. President has some autonomy in many countries including the US.

 

[Arsalan 345]

I didn't call you anything. I'm calling terrorist as whoever takes arms against India infiltrate to India, destroy lives, for the sake of Pakistan. Yeah, they are terrorists. At least there are people outside Pakistan who believe they are terrorists. That's what we wanted. Now, rest of the blabbering I'll ignore. Such things are way off topic.

I don't think it's a new law. But, he added UNSC designated terrorist to his own countries list of terrorists and banned organization. President has some autonomy in many countries including the US.

yes i think we should end this conversation.this will go nowhere.