Defence correspondent? In which of his article and for which trusted and esteemed defence journal? And based on what factual data? Personal blogs and opinions dont count.Says the defense correspondent and the aerospace engineer.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Defence correspondent? In which of his article and for which trusted and esteemed defence journal? And based on what factual data? Personal blogs and opinions dont count.Says the defense correspondent and the aerospace engineer.
Defence correspondent? In which of his article and for which trusted and esteemed defence journal? Personal blogs dont count.
Force Magazine-he usually has the same contents for the articles in the magazines themselves
If you could scroll past the pages there was a second likn that I gave which said the same thing, by
Parul Aghi (An Aerospace engineer, currently associated with the field of Guided Missiles at Defense Institute of Advanced Technology (DRDO) ).
Force magazine? I was dreading you would quote awst, janes and the like hardly a renowned and trusted source, this force magazine
Yeah sure judge the book by its cover, i know you all would do that which is why i gave the second link.
What second link? I asked you to quote a renowned/esteemed credible link and all you quote without a direct link is is some "force magazine" which if I search on the google the first link you'd get would be a British local police magazine, so much for being a reliable and renowned defence publication, should I start quoting local news publications where some guy is claiming x weapons system is superior to y. Would you believe that as a source or would you reject it?
The bottomline is that your assertion lacks credibility because:
A. You failed to quote a relibale source.
B. Lack of hard data on how the conclusion was made.
All you are saying is " believe me because I am claiming so based on some weak sources that I believe in".
we have already inducted brahmos and will induct brahmos 2 post 2017-18.
what will pakistan do then??
300 km is an overkill for pakistan especially when it could be fired from su-30 after modifications
i know manPakistan will only keep the minimum credible deterrence level maintained.
we have already inducted brahmos and will induct brahmos 2 post 2017-18.
what will pakistan do then??
300 km is an overkill for pakistan especially when it could be fired from su-30 after modifications
the thing is the diff between a subsonic and a supersonic/hypersonic cruise missileMaintain the " detterence " , of course , in whatever way possible . Pakistan has tested and inducted two cruise missiles until now and the development is ongoing . So , this is going to continue . Whats odd there now ?
the thing is the diff between a subsonic and a supersonic/hypersonic cruise missile
now its not rocket science to tell which is more effective??!!