Pakistan could get revenge for 1971 with a three front war to cut off northeast Indian states

[Aspen]

Pakistan could kill two birds with one stone:

1. Get revenge for 1971 by cutting off Northeast Indian states from India at vulnerable Siliguri corridor by instigating a proxy war. Bangladesh and China would probably support separation of northeast Indian states from India and could split up new territory. ISI is already present in Nepal and Bhutan has a security agreement with China for the Doklam Plateau.

2. Use this opportunity to start a three front war where India is distracted trying to save northeast states from being lost to China and Bangladesh, diverting resources away while Pakistan takes all of Kashmir. Indian military has admitted they cannot win a two-front war, there is no way India could win a three front war.

https://thediplomat.com/2013/11/geographys-curse-indias-vulnerable-chickens-neck/

 

[zhxy]

Need to look straight to the truth.
The current India is not India in 1971. They have nuclear weapons, and US support. A new war between the two sides only resulted in catastrophic consequences for the people of Pakistan and India. No one will win.

 

[KhanBaba2]

Too bad I can't go out and buy popcorn.

 

[Muhammad Omar]

At the time of Pandemic you are thinking about to take a revenge and proxy wars??

Read some books to calm your brain down or watch some movies and do exercise to keep yourself busy.

 

[Aspen]

At the time of Pandemic you are thinking about to take a revenge and proxy wars??

Read some books to calm your brain down or watch some movies and do exercise to keep yourself busy.

I have been reading many books about ISI lately, that is probably why

But on a serious note, India's northeast is very vulnerable. I am honestly surprised they have been able to hang on to it for this long with all the shit going on there. It is perfect scenario, an extremely vulnerable chokepoint for India, CAA/NRC is alienating and excluding masses, China has an insurgency there already. India declares millions of people stateless and revokes citizenship, jailing millions in detention centers. Independence movement in northeast emerges in response to CAA/NRC. I could not have imagined such a perfect scenario ten years ago. Who would've guessed that Indian politicians could be so stupid that instead of empowering northeast and giving them more rights, India revokes their citizenship instead creating ideal environment for independence. It's time for us to stir up some trouble. ISI is not lurking around in Nepal and Bhutan for nothing. Like 1971, it is probably a matter of time before it gets cut off from India eventually. It is a huge liability for India with so much unrest in that area from Assamese, Naxals, Maoist insurgency, ISI, Chinese proxies, and mistrust from Nepal and Bhutan. Pakistan could only keep East Pakistan until its luck ran out as it was a very vulnerable situation from day 1. I wonder if Indian plans to start mass jailing of excluded citizens in northeast will be the catalyst to spark separation from India in 10-20 years. In long run, CAA/NRC actually benefits Pakistan because India will keep isolating and repressing northeast population to the point where they may exclude many citizens who want revenge and independence. Since northeast is easy to cut off, it could actually be achievable. Such an environment would be the ideal environment for Azadi and freedom movements to thrive for separation from Indian exclusion and oppression. India should be careful or they will alienate northeast with CAA/NRC through mass detention and exclusion camps. In northeast if China gets involved, India would have a difficult time defending northeast once it gets cut off.

Reality is Pakistan may not even have to get involved in northeast.

China will do it someday by itself, when I don't know. But it's inevitable because geography favors China so they will take that shot some day. And it would be the perfect opportunity to take Kashmir if it happens. Indian military admitted their nightmare is a worst case scenario for India in a two front war because they will lose both. If you are Pakistan Army chief and you know this, would you give up once in a lifetime opportunity to take Kashmir while India is distracted? Which is more important for India to save? Kashmir or Northeast. We will find out the answer someday.

 

[Adam_Khan]

Pakistan could kill two birds with one stone:

1. Get revenge for 1971 by cutting off Northeast Indian states from India at vulnerable Siliguri corridor by instigating a proxy war. Bangladesh and China would probably support separation of northeast Indian states from India and could split up new territory. ISI is already present in Nepal and Bhutan has a security agreement with China for the Doklam Plateau.

2. Use this opportunity to start a three front war where India is distracted trying to save northeast states from being lost to China and Bangladesh, diverting resources away while Pakistan takes all of Kashmir. Indian military has admitted they cannot win a two-front war, there is no way India could win a three front war.

https://thediplomat.com/2013/11/geographys-curse-indias-vulnerable-chickens-neck/

It would be naive on your part to think that this would actually happen with the finite resources that Pakistan has.

 

[HttpError]

Pakistan already gave them a bloody nose on 27th Feb.

 

[Titanium100]

Need to look straight to the truth.
The current India is not India in 1971. They have nuclear weapons, and US support. A new war between the two sides only resulted in catastrophic consequences for the people of Pakistan and India. No one will win.

Once 3 nukes is fired at each other nobody will intervene especially the US. India will be alone to fight for herself. The World will go into severe crisis and food shortage

 

[Lincoln]

Pakistan could kill two birds with one stone:

1. Get revenge for 1971 by cutting off Northeast Indian states from India at vulnerable Siliguri corridor by instigating a proxy war. Bangladesh and China would probably support separation of northeast Indian states from India and could split up new territory. ISI is already present in Nepal and Bhutan has a security agreement with China for the Doklam Plateau.

2. Use this opportunity to start a three front war where India is distracted trying to save northeast states from being lost to China and Bangladesh, diverting resources away while Pakistan takes all of Kashmir. Indian military has admitted they cannot win a two-front war, there is no way India could win a three front war.

https://thediplomat.com/2013/11/geographys-curse-indias-vulnerable-chickens-neck/

You can't cut up a state with proxies, and secondly nukes. End of discussion.

 

[Archie]

Why would Bangladesh attack India

Sheikh Hasina is pretty much Modi's second wife
And
China is not going to risk economic ruin for pakistani wet dream
If PLA didn't help u in 1971, when the US and UK were with you, why do u think they will help u when everyone else would be against u

 

[Aspen]

You can't cut up a state with proxies, and secondly nukes. End of discussion.

Nobody said anything about nukes.

But proxies are very effective. Besides India is alienating northeast with CAA/NRC by itself so we might not even need to do anything but relax and watch Indian control of northeast implode on its own from a safe distance.

You think millions of Indians in northeast will just sit back and tolerate being excluded, stripped of citizenship, detained, and jailed in camps and do nothing to stop it? I don't think there is any place in the world where people can be marginalized like that without an uprising or rebellion against their oppressors. India should be giving northeast more rights so they have less reason to separate. Instead India does exact opposite and revokes citizenship declaring them stateless giving them more reason to separate. If you had told me this 10 years ago, I would never have believed Indian politicians could be this stupid.

Why would Bangladesh attack India

Sheikh Hasina is pretty much Modi's second wife
And
China is not going to risk economic ruin for pakistani wet dream
If PLA didn't help u in 1971, when the US and UK were with you, why do u think they will help u when everyone else would be against u

China will not give a damn about US or UK in 20 years when US already fears China today. At some point China will reach a level where their economy doesn't depend on the west but on themselves and that is probably only a decade or two away. At that point, they would not be afraid of India.

As far as Bangladesh, Sheikh Hasina will probably be dead by the time this happens.

Bangladeshis will have to decide if they want to support India or get a piece of their land.

 

[HammerHead081]

Stupid stupid fantasies. Damn dude staying home hitting you pretty hard.

 

[jamahir]

@Aspen, firstly, let's fight against Corona first. Secondly, about the other matter, let's set up the same Progressive political system in South Asia which will remove the need for war and solve issues like Kashmir. Why war when things can be solved peacefully ??

@Muhammad Omar, long time no see. I think we used to interact in the Pakistani actresses and models thread.

 

[T90TankGuy]

Why would Bangladesh attack India

Sheikh Hasina is pretty much Modi's second wife
And
China is not going to risk economic ruin for pakistani wet dream
If PLA didn't help u in 1971, when the US and UK were with you, why do u think they will help u when everyone else would be against u

Two mistakes in this statment .
Amit shah is modi's second wife , Hasina qualifies as his third.
The Chinese have not helped Pakistan even in kargil where the stakes were much higher as both countries were nuclear powers by then .
This thread is a prime example of kids on the net with no work to do and a wild imagination.

 

[Fireurimagination]

Nobody is cutting anything unless one side is decisively defeated in a full fledged war. With both sides having nukes that ain't happening. So Chill and stay indoors.