What's new

Pakistan Continues its Policy of Cowardice Towards Afghanistan

with your logic , CPEC shouldnt be build , its chinese imports passing through

there is something called tax

We don't need this tax or transit fees

We need removal sanctuaries for BLA and TTP Terrorists in Afghanistan
 
.
Pakistan did this a day after Afghanistan based TTP killed 4 Pakistani soldiers and weeks after Afghanistan based BLA attacked Pakistan Stock Exchange in Karachi

View attachment 650676

Disgraceful act by a country led by cowards. Both in uniform and in sherwani
Seems like you have an ulterior motive of undermining Pakistan army.
 
.
Seems like you have an ulterior motive of undermining Pakistan army.

There are soldiers dying daily and you think criticizing military and civilian establishment for that means having some ulterior motive

Shabash genius. Some patriot you are
 
.
Pakistan did this a day after Afghanistan based TTP killed 4 Pakistani soldiers and weeks after Afghanistan based BLA attacked Pakistan Stock Exchange in Karachi

View attachment 650676

Disgraceful act by a country led by cowards. Both in uniform and in sherwani
After reading this Ministry of Foreign Affairs letter carefully, we need to look at the advantages of Pakistan, India, and Afghanistan. One thing should also put in your consideration on august 5,2019 when India change the status of Kashimir and remove article 370 and enforce curfew in the valley; kill the peoples of Kashmiri and lockdown them in their houses. Pakistan is the first country that raised the voice of Indian atrocities against Kashmiri peoples. On August 7th and 8th, 2019, a very high-level talk was held in Pakistan, where all the Gov and establishments were involved and they made lots of decisions.

One of the main points that was made was that there should be no trade between India and Pakistan. India stops their side business with us after the Abhinandon event. Since then, Pakistan froze all trade with India, and after almost a year now, we have survived without a single business deal with India. Now the question is exciting here, why do we need to open the Wagha Border? The answer is that APTTA is a bilateral trade agreement signed in 2010 by Pakistan and Afghanistan that calls for greater facilitation in the movement of goods amongst the two countries. The signed Agreement permits Afghanistan trucks access to Wagah border with India, where Afghan goods will be offloaded onto Indian trucks, but it does not allow Indian goods to be loaded onto trucks for transit back to Afghanistan. If we are not fulfilling our Muslim brother agreements, then the upcoming project of CPEC will heavily use Afghan transit in the future, which will create a problem when we send goods to Central Asia or Russia via the afghan link. If Afghan doesn't care about Kashmiri's cause and still wants to trade with India, then we can't enforce our will on them; this is their choice, and as per Agreement, let them use our transit for their one-way business, So in the future CPEC project we don't lose much in our trade volume.
 
.
After reading this Ministry of Foreign Affairs letter carefully, we need to look at the advantages of Pakistan, India, and Afghanistan. One thing should also put in your consideration on august 5,2019 when India change the status of Kashimir and remove article 370 and enforce curfew in the valley; kill the peoples of Kashmiri and lockdown them in their houses. Pakistan is the first country that raised the voice of Indian atrocities against Kashmiri peoples. On August 7th and 8th, 2019, a very high-level talk was held in Pakistan, where all the Gov and establishments were involved and they made lots of decisions.

One of the main points that was made was that there should be no trade between India and Pakistan. India stops their side business with us after the Abhinandon event. Since then, Pakistan froze all trade with India, and after almost a year now, we have survived without a single business deal with India. Now the question is exciting here, why do we need to open the Wagha Border? The answer is that APTTA is a bilateral trade agreement signed in 2010 by Pakistan and Afghanistan that calls for greater facilitation in the movement of goods amongst the two countries. The signed Agreement permits Afghanistan trucks access to Wagah border with India, where Afghan goods will be offloaded onto Indian trucks, but it does not allow Indian goods to be loaded onto trucks for transit back to Afghanistan. If we are not fulfilling our Muslim brother agreements, then the upcoming project of CPEC will heavily use Afghan transit in the future, which will create a problem when we send goods to Central Asia or Russia via the afghan link. If Afghan doesn't care about Kashmiri's cause and still wants to trade with India, then we can't enforce our will on them; this is their choice, and as per Agreement, let them use our transit for their one-way business, So in the future CPEC project we don't lose much in our trade volume.

There are Pakistani soldiers dying right now due to this attitude

What CPEC and exports are you planning to do with terrorists attacking and killing our soldiers with impunity?

Are you sure you can export anything with terrorists roaming openly and killing Pakistani soldiers with ease

How ignorant you guys are??? What the hell is wrong with you guys? Are you that dumb?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
F*ck muslim brother agreement and f*ck CPEC

There are Pakistani soldiers dying right now due to this attitude

What CPEC and exports are you planning to do with terrorists attacking and killing our soldiers with impunity?

Are you sure you can export anything with terrorists roaming openly and killing Pakistani soldiers with ease

How ignorant you guys are??? What the hell is wrong with you guys? Are you that dumb?
We really are aggressive. There's no use to show off our aggression on a deal that was signed in 2010 Otherwise there's no difference between us and them. This is something we need to learn how to bite our own tongue.
 
.
We really are aggressive. There's no use to show off our aggression on a deal that was signed in 2010 Otherwise there's no difference between us and them.

sSJQgmW.gif
 
.
There are soldiers dying daily and you think criticizing military and civilian establishment for that means having some ulterior motive

Shabash genius. Some patriot you are

In war soldiers become shaheed. If you think you can do better you go and fight otherwise shut up and stop bitching. I am a patriotnist : a combination of patriot and nationalist so stop accusing me of something I am not.
 
.
In war soldiers become shaheed. If you think you can do better you go and fight otherwise shut up and stop bitching. I am a patriotnist : a combination of patriot and nationalist so stop accusing me of something I am not.



Anyways i don't need a certificate of patriotism from you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
We really are aggressive. There's no use to show off our aggression on a deal that was signed in 2010 Otherwise there's no difference between us and them. This is something we need to learn how to bite our own tongue.

Jindal lekar jaraha hai phir Afghanistan se metal?

Nawaz Sharif ko kyon nikala?
 
.
Pakistan did this a day after Afghanistan based TTP killed 4 Pakistani soldiers and weeks after Afghanistan based BLA attacked Pakistan Stock Exchange in Karachi

View attachment 650676

Disgraceful act by a country led by cowards. Both in uniform and in sherwani

well when a province disagrees you can’t get annoyed. Let’s face it Afghanistan is our province, we need to ensure we don’t over react. I also do not understand why we give so much credence to the mayors of Kabul, karzai, asharaf Ghani.... that northern alliance dude.

we as the rulers should be more benevolent.....

kv
 
. .
Jindal lekar jaraha hai phir Afghanistan se metal?

Nawaz Sharif ko kyon nikala?
I am a more military mouthpiece and have no interest in domestic politics. As far as I know , It has become quite challenging to rig the elections in Pakistan. The election commission is more independent than before; there is a better election monitoring system; the media has more freedom than ever, and many other electoral reforms have been introduced. Yes, the Military can directly take over and declare martial law, but it is unlikely to happen in the present regional and international circumstances.

Why did Nawaz Sharif, who was once a pro-military politician, turn against the establishment?

The middle-class population in Pakistan has increased manifold in the past decade. It is now close to 42 percent of the total population. The same pattern can be seen in Punjab, which is Sharif's political stronghold. Punjab's rural areas have economically prospered due to the infrastructure setup and connectivity to more significant markets in the province. This constituency and the changing economic dynamics have forced Sharif to assert the civilian authority over the Military. This is the requirement of his political constituency.

Pakistan's civilian business community wants better trade ties with neighboring countries, including India, without the Military's lens. They believe they can reduce the cost of production through regional cooperation. But the Military doesn't allow this; because it impacts directly on the National security, didn't we see how Sharif brothers played so stupid under the Indian game, The military establishment is against this policy, hence the clash between Sharif and the generals. There's no compromise on Pakistan security, even my brother in gov and causing national security challenges; I feel no feeling about him and remove him from this office.
If you are patriot, can you accept it when this is bombing on our Brothers in Kargil?
Jindal lekar jaraha hai phir Afghanistan se metal? IK is smart but not businessmen that is why NS created his demand and replace Jindal but he needs to stop acting stupid and become more pro-military and strong Pakistan vocal-only for Pakistan interest like IK. I don't see any other issue with NS, if he takes National interest first priority and gives second priority to his business.

Screen Shot 2020-06-25 at 9.40.37 AM.png

Please listen in car deck.,I really enjoy and like him if he fixes his anti-establishment thinking.
 
Last edited:
. .
elections in Pakistan.
are paper selections when political parties do not conform to their own mandate
the Military can directly take over and declare martial law,
it does not need to. it has hath in ghee and sur in karhai.
Pakistan's civilian business community wants better trade ties with neighboring countries, including India, without the Military's lens.
Economies in Asia are too interconnected to adhere to political leverages. That is why corruption is a perpetual phenomenon.

However i would rather have a cunning Nawaz run private affairs with Indians than a smart IK to run State business with them due National Security.
IK is smart but not businessmen that is why NS

Election mandate by IK include giving the business community more of a say in geo strategic management of the affairs of the country.
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom