Raj-Hindustani
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 4, 2019
- Messages
- 5,208
- Reaction score
- -39
- Country
- Location
No, we don't want Taliban at our next door..
Pakistan carries out airstrikes along AfPak border
- Thread starter Mirzali Khan
- Start date
No, we don't want Taliban at our next door..
Yes that also played a part but 2007 madarassa bombing was the trigger.
Mirzali Khan
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2020
- Messages
- 5,857
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
No it was when the writ of law regarding FATA and military action was discarded, so what ended up happening was that "they" saw it as an infringement and encroachment.
Was posted 9 hours before strikes took place.
What about other enemies.
TheSolution
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2021
- Messages
- 7,530
- Reaction score
- 6
- Country
- Location
Killing them won't cut it, they have unlimited replacements, America knows this very well.
I respect Iranians a lot for that.
Mofos are issuing threats every other day, ready for smoke with anyone
But nuclear powered Bajwa can't deal with these cavemen.
Not true. What you are saying was after 2008.
Mirzali Khan
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2020
- Messages
- 5,857
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Ok true I was talking about the "origins"
*Halwa powered Bajwa
Its because Pakistanis are taking their sh*t thats why. There's a recent scandal about Iranis treatment of Afghans in Iran and same Afghans that talk trash to Pakistanis are begging Iranis and becoming peaceful humanity activists. Moment we start going after the Afghan/Baloch hideouts in Punjab and the Waziristan den in Karachi it will keep on going. Iranis have their knee on their necks, we just bow down and try to do bhai bhai.
If population is united and just as aggressive then they tame it down. FEAR is the key word FEAR.
Darth Vader
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2011
- Messages
- 4,447
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Bro stop talking if you dont know the history, at that time Pakistan didn't even have those capabilities . TTP started as a thug gang mostly into kidnapping and so on, nothing to do with your story
Mirzali Khan
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2020
- Messages
- 5,857
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Raj-Hindustani
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 4, 2019
- Messages
- 5,208
- Reaction score
- -39
- Country
- Location
With others, we can deal it dealing it...
Super power was not able to deal with them... We are a poor and weak country
I don't understand what do you mean by with others, we can deal it dealing it.
Which capabilities? Search for 2007 madarassa airstrike.
Shaheen123
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2022
- Messages
- 92
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
US was fighting as an occupation force against guerilla fighters which are notoriously difficult. If the point comes in Pak-IEA relations where there is full on battle the IEA will need to cross through the international border which they are not capable of as they do not have missiles, proper attack choppers, fighter jets, drones, good artillery like SH-15, etc. Can we please not hype up the IEA as "afghanistan graveyard of empires, undefeated freedom fighters ", they can not fight efficiently and for long against a conventional military like Pakistan or Iran. We can have drones and f-16s circling kabul as soon as they cross the border. Assuming we use drones properly like the TB-2 we can destroy all their artillery, bases, and convoys along the border.
The only way IEA will fight is to constantly recruit more people and send them in waves to the border which will be a hassle to control but regardless they won't make a dent into our territory
White privilege
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2022
- Messages
- 1,637
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Imran should retweet this, there can be no politics when it comes to giving it back to the terries.
Darth Vader
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2011
- Messages
- 4,447
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
This situation can be looked by 3 versions
1 Army had to start somewhere to brush the current social backlash they are getting from public and trying to get the support back.
2 As alot of people saying what the doctor ordered in this its Uncle Sam and pushing Pakistan and IEA to fight each other.
3 Pakistan had enough from regular attacks which are originating from Afghanistan
For the maint point is timing why now why not earlier or wait so political situation in the country becomes stabilised in the country.
Few days new was being shared that around 300 scums were trying to enter Pakistan and Pakistan was able to stop majority but some were able to enter, why didnt military highlighted that on media to create narrative that this has left no option for Armed forces to take a hard approach.
One point can be said there was a imminent threat Alert from one area but simultaneous attacks shows a large force should be present in multiple locations if this is not the case i think its a diversion tactics in comings days social media should have answers
In regards to IEA attacking Pakistan and people comparing Pakistan to Uncle sam's blunder, goals are different, location is different fighting forces are different, , its biggest strength is also its biggest weakness these are rag tag militia groups which have learned alot but they have never faced a full occupied army majority, specially with numbers and willing to fight.
The only way Pakistan can lose is, it will be from leadership starts previous mistakes and blunders.
With constant attacks, Pakistan can create a buffer zone and if it really escalate Pakistan can cut off all supplies going through and start forcing refugees back that will clear some local support these groups can get inside Pakistan and make more problems for IEA
1 Army had to start somewhere to brush the current social backlash they are getting from public and trying to get the support back.
2 As alot of people saying what the doctor ordered in this its Uncle Sam and pushing Pakistan and IEA to fight each other.
3 Pakistan had enough from regular attacks which are originating from Afghanistan
For the maint point is timing why now why not earlier or wait so political situation in the country becomes stabilised in the country.
Few days new was being shared that around 300 scums were trying to enter Pakistan and Pakistan was able to stop majority but some were able to enter, why didnt military highlighted that on media to create narrative that this has left no option for Armed forces to take a hard approach.
One point can be said there was a imminent threat Alert from one area but simultaneous attacks shows a large force should be present in multiple locations if this is not the case i think its a diversion tactics in comings days social media should have answers
In regards to IEA attacking Pakistan and people comparing Pakistan to Uncle sam's blunder, goals are different, location is different fighting forces are different, , its biggest strength is also its biggest weakness these are rag tag militia groups which have learned alot but they have never faced a full occupied army majority, specially with numbers and willing to fight.
The only way Pakistan can lose is, it will be from leadership starts previous mistakes and blunders.
With constant attacks, Pakistan can create a buffer zone and if it really escalate Pakistan can cut off all supplies going through and start forcing refugees back that will clear some local support these groups can get inside Pakistan and make more problems for IEA
Similar threads
