My-Analogous
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2009
- Messages
- 7,013
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
This deal cover all we lost for our JF17 procurement delays. Its cover around one to one and a half year of production JF17 production
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am at an utter lose at this seemingly prevailing mindset that India has somehow "lost" its superior position of late. Nothing has changed as far as India's military is concerned, they still have the clear edge on the Pak Mil and are extending their superiority year on year. Let's talk brass tacks- the IAF's M2K and MiG-29UPG fleet are enough both in quality and quantity to take on the entire PAF F-16 fleet with change, this si before we even factor in the 150+ MKI fleet that is expanding year on year and will eventually see some 300 MKI fighters in service, a machine the PAF (let's be honest) has no answer to. Coming to the point about the US, yes DIPLOMATIC ties were strained because of all that nonsense last year but military-miitary engagement was left unaffected, US and Indian Mil took part in exercises during that time and will continue to at a higher rate. This has been echoed by military brass on both sides. And if the US is serious about their "Asian pivot" they can't afford to "drop" India. Even if they did, India wasn't making itself dependant on the US, they are still perusing their own path.I do not believe in magic, which means that nations do not suddenly get strong or week. I see some people believe on those lines, also we give too much importance to US influence and its changing intentions. Even when we were not in good terms with US and we were not that economically better we were still doing alright. Currently we are better than what we were in past, so I think the balance will not change much. Additionally, we are in recovery mode trying to consolidate. So when economy takes a turn you will see balance tilting back in India's favor.
In short India has gained a lot in last 2 decades and gains don't just get washed away, we also have our levers we can press. At the same time Pakistan has taken considerable damage in last decade and their is no way to magically change things.
Last, while people talk about having weapons etc, what they miss is war needs a lot of money and that is something that Pakistan does not have, having few more types of weapons does not matter when you do not have the economy to back the war. I see a lot of people here talk about raining missiles without realizing how much it takes to sponsor such a rain.
The reason Indians are not big fan of war is because they know that the cost of war is paid for many years, the cost of 71 war is still paid by us.
Only source is News International & other websites like DU & The diplomat also quoting NewsInt.
Nothing on Express Tribune or DAWN.
Remember same NewsInternational also reported fake news that VK Singh accepted Indian involvement in Balochistan.
poland isnt buying more f16s - potential future f16 seller?
Poland to purchase 64 new 5th gen fighters between 2020 and 2030
I hope you guys won't make the same mistake like the past. In other words, stock up on F-16's when it will become obsolete. Just like you have F-7's and Mirages right now. In the past, India didn't have top line jets so it worked out to have Farmers, F-7 and older Mirages. Going forward, India is moving ahead with massive plans for 5th Gen and other top line jets like Rafale. So the PAF will need to have some deterrence in place. I know the financial situation and all. But strategy is a strategy and when you are arch enemies, you have got to keep up to some degree. I think a few squadrons of twin turbines and a couple of stealth in the next 5-7 years are a must have. Otherwise, the gap will go huge when India starts to get Rafale and T-50 types of jets
A credible nuclear deterrent is not enough. The solution is in a leadership that is coherent...and a society that is stable and not explosiveThe solution lies in maintaining a credible nuclear deterrent and working on not being arch enemies, not in more warplanes.
Dude I am saying same thing are you, however I was trying to point at some things that I see repeating. People think that suddenly a magic will happen and balance will tilt. I am just saying it does not work that way. Years of work cannot be undone by one masterstroke.I am at an utter lose at this seemingly prevailing mindset that India has somehow "lost" its superior position of late. Nothing has changed as far as India's military is concerned, they still have the clear edge on the Pak Mil and are extending their superiority year on year. Let's talk brass tacks- the IAF's M2K and MiG-29UPG fleet are enough both in quality and quantity to take on the entire PAF F-16 fleet with change, this si before we even factor in the 150+ MKI fleet that is expanding year on year and will eventually see some 300 MKI fighters in service, a machine the PAF (let's be honest) has no answer to. Coming to the point about the US, yes DIPLOMATIC ties were strained because of all that nonsense last year but military-miitary engagement was left unaffected, US and Indian Mil took part in exercises during that time and will continue to at a higher rate. This has been echoed by military brass on both sides. And if the US is serious about their "Asian pivot" they can't afford to "drop" India. Even if they did, India wasn't making itself dependant on the US, they are still perusing their own path.
Yes but what masterstroke? 13 second hand F-16s??Dude I am saying same thing are you, however I was trying to point at some things that I see repeating. People think that suddenly a magic will happen and balance will tilt. I am just saying it does not work that way. Years of work cannot be undone by one masterstroke.
Talking the idea in general and not this instance in particular, I got that feeling reading the thread. India has very good growth for 2 years, economic have their good and bad days but the progress we made in 2 decades is not going anywhere.Yes but what masterstroke? 13 second hand F-16s??
Ah I see, you're talking about the general pessimism in India of late. Well that's natural I guess of the short-sighted idiots who breath today. One only needs to have a basic understanding of economics and the global finical crisis to understand what is going on not to mention google to see that India's mid to long term growth is looking nothing but healthy.Talking the idea in general and not this instance in particular, I got that feeling reading the thread. India has very good growth for 2 years, economic have their good and bad days but the progress we made in 2 decades is not going anywhere.
A credible nuclear deterrent is not enough. The solution is in a leadership that is coherent...and a society that is stable and not explosive
Please, read my post # 304Please do