To address your first delusional comment:
US doesn't arm Pakistan with higher-tier anti-terror equipment, constitutes me saying "the US supports and abets terrorism in Pakistan"? is that the nub of your delusional premise? If we are to look at things through the 'lens of objectivity' it would be sage for the US to build a rapport with india, again nobody is disputing whether india is a 'cash cow' or not or whether the US should look to tap into this seemingly fruitful market, i was merely trying to imply given that we are trying to further tap into the asian market, particularly india, we are inadvertently trying to maintain a favourable view in india's 'eyes' therefore, not willing to provide any high-tier military equipment to Pakistan (which by the way would prove to be indispensable in the 'war on terror') as this would somehow 'upset the balance' and irk india. Thereby, leaving Pakistan devoid of any real anti-terror equipment, to fend off the many terror-assailants. Either arm Pakistan adequately in the hope to eradicate terrorism from Pakistan in its entirety or continue at the current pace. This cannot be accentuated enough.
So in essence what you're stating is, the 'global policeman' that is the US, is willing to overlook indian sponsored terrorism in Pakistan for monetary gains? I would double check whether this aligns with our country's official stance, these bold, chest-thumping statements you make aren't helping our image globally.
Moreover, given that your an indian, the same folks that see 'Hafiz Saeed' in 103 places at once, across every border check point, im not a tad bit surprised that most of your posts are inherently delusion filled and steadfast in favour of india, therefore you cannot be trusted to be impartial (Mr Singh i'm guessing thats your real name) even though throughout its history Pakistan has remained and is an american ally whom is on the front lines combating this global scourge that is terrorism. You're beginning to sound no different to extremists. "We should support india, as its an economic powerhouse" with the added connotations of overlooking indian sponsored terrorism. Kudos to you sir, our soldiers die to protect our society and values. Our leaders hold all these meetings/conferences to combat terrorism, you are doing a great injustice to our people when you make such ludicrous statements.
So this begs the question.. Do you accept there is an unprecedented link between india (namely RAW) and terrorism in Pakistan? Or do you deny this fact?? (Failing to answer will mean you are aware of indian sponsored terrorism and wish not to comment upon it).
Ps. Largest democracy who's leader was formerly banned from entering our country before his questionable acquittal with regards to the Gujarat massacre. Can you imagine making a man who's had an apparent strong hand in facilitating this heinous crime/violence being the President/Prime Minister of any western country ?? In sight of this admission, 'largest democracy'?, 'peaceful folk'??. (ahem ahem Kashmir). Who's leader has an extremely dangerous link to a massacre. Couple this to india's new 'peace driven' initiative namely, 'Ghar wapsi' or 'coming home' scheme that has been recently launched against Muslims and Christians within the country.. india a peaceful country? All of which is a figment of your vast imagination..You're clearly not endowed with intellect, but gifted with an abundance of stupidity i see.
US doesn't arm Pakistan with higher-tier anti-terror equipment, constitutes me saying "the US supports and abets terrorism in Pakistan"? is that the nub of your delusional premise? If we are to look at things through the 'lens of objectivity' it would be sage for the US to build a rapport with india, again nobody is disputing whether india is a 'cash cow' or not or whether the US should look to tap into this seemingly fruitful market, i was merely trying to imply given that we are trying to further tap into the asian market, particularly india, we are inadvertently trying to maintain a favourable view in india's 'eyes' therefore, not willing to provide any high-tier military equipment to Pakistan (which by the way would prove to be indispensable in the 'war on terror') as this would somehow 'upset the balance' and irk india. Thereby, leaving Pakistan devoid of any real anti-terror equipment, to fend off the many terror-assailants. Either arm Pakistan adequately in the hope to eradicate terrorism from Pakistan in its entirety or continue at the current pace. This cannot be accentuated enough.
So in essence what you're stating is, the 'global policeman' that is the US, is willing to overlook indian sponsored terrorism in Pakistan for monetary gains? I would double check whether this aligns with our country's official stance, these bold, chest-thumping statements you make aren't helping our image globally.
Moreover, given that your an indian, the same folks that see 'Hafiz Saeed' in 103 places at once, across every border check point, im not a tad bit surprised that most of your posts are inherently delusion filled and steadfast in favour of india, therefore you cannot be trusted to be impartial (Mr Singh i'm guessing thats your real name) even though throughout its history Pakistan has remained and is an american ally whom is on the front lines combating this global scourge that is terrorism. You're beginning to sound no different to extremists. "We should support india, as its an economic powerhouse" with the added connotations of overlooking indian sponsored terrorism. Kudos to you sir, our soldiers die to protect our society and values. Our leaders hold all these meetings/conferences to combat terrorism, you are doing a great injustice to our people when you make such ludicrous statements.
So this begs the question.. Do you accept there is an unprecedented link between india (namely RAW) and terrorism in Pakistan? Or do you deny this fact?? (Failing to answer will mean you are aware of indian sponsored terrorism and wish not to comment upon it).
Ps. Largest democracy who's leader was formerly banned from entering our country before his questionable acquittal with regards to the Gujarat massacre. Can you imagine making a man who's had an apparent strong hand in facilitating this heinous crime/violence being the President/Prime Minister of any western country ?? In sight of this admission, 'largest democracy'?, 'peaceful folk'??. (ahem ahem Kashmir). Who's leader has an extremely dangerous link to a massacre. Couple this to india's new 'peace driven' initiative namely, 'Ghar wapsi' or 'coming home' scheme that has been recently launched against Muslims and Christians within the country.. india a peaceful country? All of which is a figment of your vast imagination..You're clearly not endowed with intellect, but gifted with an abundance of stupidity i see.
Well, at this time you stuck to one theme, albeit it read like a rendition of the sixth sense - " I see Indian people"
Pretty much accused us for the continued existence of terror groups in Pakistan when you say " why does the US not arm Pakistani's with higher grade weapons and systems to combat terrorism?? One possible reason could be the paradigm-shift under which the US looks to woo india with its technological advanced weapons for billions. Thus far, the US has offered nothing of real value in terms of defence equipment to Pakistan, in combating terrorism." .
You created the fiasco and you are complaining about why the U.S. won't give you weapons? We give you a lot in military Aid and you have plenty of weapons of your own. It's really not the weapons you need, rather you need do what you are doing in the NWF and continue to expand that to all terrorist organizations, and we mean ALL if you are serious about cleansing Pakistan of these snakes. And I would love to see that happen, back in saddle towards economic gains and much success.
.
You are absolutely right when you say we are heavily in favour of India- and if India reciprocates, it will only get stronger not just via military ties, but in investment, trade and economic partnership. If one looks at it objectively, it's a huge market, largest democracy and economic powerhouse to be- has a great young skilled labor force and they are a peaceful lot, with no grand vision of being expansionist. They being seen as a great opportunity is not unique to the U.S. Why would we not look at it favourably, when 99.99% of nations feels the same too.
Meanwhile you can have your meltdown and the only takers will be from like minded minority. Your messaging has no market share If you look around the global community. Got to be frustrating for you and you are barely cracking 40 posts here. Can't wait to read those meltdowns for another 40,
Last edited:
