What's new

Pakistan Army's VT-4 Main Battle Tank | Updates & Discussions

I doubt that you'll need a thousand MBT as tip of spear, just not cost wise viable.
The problem is a lot of the Pakistani Indian border is good terrain for tank engagements. Whoever holds the advantage in MBTs and artillery commands the land battles. It is different from China versus India, where large or even medium tank battles are simply impossible due to the extremely high altitudes and mountainous terrain. That is why 600 to 1000 VT-4s is in the sights ... the current order of 300 is just the very beginning. Neither side has the ability to completely win the aerial war and use air superiority to level ground targets so tank warfare is still extremely crucial.
One of the major factors is already pointed out above by Figaro regarding the terrain and the long border...
...secondly India has like ~3500 tanks IIRC. In order to counter Indian armor and to be able to make its own armored thrusts...Pak needs a sizable number of tanks.

Last but not least...there are a lot of old tanks that would need to be replaced. With that all in mind...planning for 1000 VT4 seems sensible.
 
.
In the Iran Iraq War, the Iraqis never maintained complete air superiortiy in the 8 years of war even though they had many times more modern aircraft than the Iranians. The Indian Pakistani disparity is a lot smaller than the Iranian Iraqi one and Pakistan has a much much better supply situation than Iran. What this means is the PAF will have to be tactically skilled as much as possible and conserve resources ... but maintaining balance with the IAF even in a long term conflict is definietely doable. War is not just fought on numbers. Besides, India's MIC capability is extremely weak, so they will have to rely mostly on imports to make up for their losses.

In World War II, the Luftwaffe was still able to dominate the skies or at least contest air superiority in the Eastern Front until 1944 even though the VVS (Soviet AF) had many times greater number of aircraft.
we are nuclear power remember there will be a nuke launched its a war goes more than a week.
 
.
That's right, my post should have had the / to distinguish between the S and M version.

As for numbers, it's confusing, here from sources;

and 1,000-1,100 T-90 MBTs of both the MS and Bhishma S variants in service,


The Army currently operates 1,100 T-90S tanks, of which 300 were directly procured from Russia.


There are currently around 1,000-1,100 T-90 MBTs of both the MS and Bhishma S variants in service, although the operational readiness rate of the tanks remains unclear. According to one estimate, 850-900 are of the T-90S Bhishma variant. Of the two, the T-


In all, India plans to have 310 T-90S and 1,330 T-90M tanks in service by 2020 (total of 1,657 tanks by 2020).


The T-90S Bhishma is the main battle tank for the Indian Army. According to the Military Balance 2019 handbook published by the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), over 1,025 T-90S tanks are operational in the Indian Army at present




India currently operates 2011 T-90S which were procured in three separate orders. Two batches (124 Russian built tanks and 186 tanks to be built in India in 2001 and a further 124 Russian built tanks and 223 tanks to be built in India in 2007) were purchased from Russia.




At present Indian Army is estimated to have more than 1600 T-90 Bhishma tanks and these numbers will cross 2000 by the year 2022.




Most say what you say i.e. around 1,500 T-90's, mix of variants. I also to believe this to be accurate, the other sources seem to have got things mixed up, hence my original post (2011 tanks).
That's actually good news i.e. they won't have over 2,000.
These all are screwed up information.

For example.
T90M is the most advance T90 version and is recently developed for Russian forces only. It's not available for export. However it's export version, called T90MS is meant for export which India is eyeing in large numbers (464 units).

Indian T90 fleet comprise of T90S version only, with mixed fleet of Russian produced and domestically produced tanks. Slight differences exist between different batches, but overall they all belong to T90S cetagory.

Similar misconception exist about Arjun fleet. There are numerous sources out there which claim India operate around 248 Arjun tanks. But in reality it operate 124 Arjun Mk1 tank and is yet to place order for 124 Arjun Mk2 tanks. Some clever/idiot added up the numbers of Arjun which exist and the numbers of Arjun which are planned, and created the confusion.

Same is problem with T90 numbers data. As far as I remember, by mid 2016, there were around 950 T90 tanks in Indian arsenal, and target was 1650 tanks in total. Now there are two possibilities

1: India has produced 1200 T90S and has placed order for 464 T90MS totalling 1650+ T90S/MS tanks in Indian arsenal in future.

2: India has achieved the production target of 1650 T90 tanks by secretly producing T90S tanks. It now has placed order for 464 T90MS which once delivered will reach the total of 2100+ T90 tanks in total.

The first case is more believable
 
. . .
both will negatively impact planning. but we are not planners so no harm done :enjoy:
Overestimation can also be very negative ... it can impede offensive planning and therefore strategic initiative. I would highly read up the story of General George B. McClellan of the Union Army in the United States Civil War, who is one of the best examples of how consistently overestimating the enemy can lead to very poor consequences.
 
.
These all are screwed up information.

For example.
T90M is the most advance T90 version and is recently developed for Russian forces only. It's not available for export. However it's export version, called T90MS is meant for export which India is eyeing in large numbers (464 units).

Indian T90 fleet comprise of T90S version only, with mixed fleet of Russian produced and domestically produced tanks. Slight differences exist between different batches, but overall they all belong to T90S cetagory.

Similar misconception exist about Arjun fleet. There are numerous sources out there which claim India operate around 248 Arjun tanks. But in reality it operate 124 Arjun Mk1 tank and is yet to place order for 124 Arjun Mk2 tanks. Some clever/idiot added up the numbers of Arjun which exist and the numbers of Arjun which are planned, and created the confusion.

Same is problem with T90 numbers data. As far as I remember, by mid 2016, there were around 950 T90 tanks in Indian arsenal, and target was 1650 tanks in total. Now there are two possibilities

1: India has produced 1200 T90S and has placed order for 464 T90MS totalling 1650+ T90S/MS tanks in Indian arsenal in future.

2: India has achieved the production target of 1650 T90 tanks by secretly producing T90S tanks. It now has placed order for 464 T90MS which once delivered will reach the total of 2100+ T90 tanks in total.

The first case is more believable
What are the T72 numbers? If we go by Wiki then at least 39 of their 66 tank regiments are equipped with them. 2 with the Arjun and the rest with T90s?
 
. .
both will negatively impact planning. but we are not planners so no harm done :enjoy:

Even if you overestimate by 2-3%? Given they already have superior numbers, isn't it better to consider that they have a few more than what is actually thought?
 
. .
Even if you overestimate by 2-3%? Given they already have superior numbers, isn't it better to consider that they have a few more than what is actually thought?
overestimation of 400 tanks means overestimating almost 9 extra regiments armed with T 90 MS... 9 regiments means 1 full armd division and one independent armd brigade....now think about it again and how it can change everything.
 
.
overestimation of 400 tanks means overestimating almost 9 extra regiments armed with T 90 MS... 9 regiments means 1 full armd division and one independent armd brigade....now think about it again and how it can change everything.

I don't know how many T 90s they have, but let's assume it's 1,800 (as I've seen estimates ranging from 1,600 to 2,000 here), 3% of that is 54 tanks. Is that too much to overestimate?
 
.
I don't know how many T 90s they have, but let's assume it's 1,800 (as I've seen estimates ranging from 1,600 to 2,000 here), 3% of that is 54 tanks. Is that too much to overestimate?
my earlier cmnt was regarding difference of 400 tanks. as waz and tipu7 were discussing
 
. . .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom