RadarGudumluMuhimmat
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2019
- Messages
- 775
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
I'd still back Turkey's indigenous turboshaft engine.
Yes, let's say it's 5-7 years away from serial production and a serviceable attack helicopter (T129 or T629). But it's opportunity to enter a helicopter supply chain and, by trusting Turkey so early in the process (when the engine is not mature, when it's untested) we can make a case for transfer-of-technology, production sharing, etc.
Let's buck bad habits (e.g., rush imports, hard currency outflows, no local industry development, etc).
For serisi production of TS1400, 2025 was not correct, it was a year that was said by examining the development program long ago. The next process depends entirely on the testing performance of the helicopter, and many parts of the licensed T700s come from outside, so it can take a long time to produce, but for the Ts1400, this will not be a problem. But considering the integration to the helicopter and the risk of desired efficiency, the China road is still much more logical for Pakistan.
Unfortunately, technology transfer is not that easy for countries like us. For example, helicopter self defense systems developed by Aselsan emerged with the knowledge gained from the Spews II project. And the America I know has already banned them for a 3rd party country (especially if it's not a nato member). The same may have happened with Leoanrdo, yes, we say that we developed the T625 - T629 series ourselves, but the Agusta project is a $ 3 billion project and a lot of know-how was received from this project, especially for dynamic parts.