Pakistan Army's Resistance in 1965 - Psychological Impact on IA brass.

[nForce]

Whatever the debate going on here, I like they way Indians taking interest in Pakistan defence forum and our defence history, I you....
I doubt Indian Forums would have frequent **** visitors

compare the population..Its just a matter of statistics

 

[kaku1]

"According to Indian claims, at the end of hostilities on 23 September 1965, India held about 200 square miles (518 square kilometres)of Pakistani territory in the Sialkot sector including the towns and villages of Phillora, Deoli, Bajragarhi, Suchetgarh, Pagowal, Chaprar, Muhadpur, Tilakpur,Thro Mandi, Khanpur Sydan, south east and east of Sialkot city, which were returned to Pakistan after the Tashkent Declaration in January 1966. Likewise, by the end of the hostilities, Pakistan held up to 1,600 square miles of Indian territory, of which 1,300 square miles included desert sectors.Despite the "huge losses on both sides", The Australian attributed the victory in this battle to Pakistan"...... by: Rao, K. V. Krishna


"According to Indian claims, at the end of hostilities on 23 September 1965, India held about 200 square miles (518 square kilometres)of Pakistani territory in the Sialkot sector including the towns and villages of Phillora, Deoli, Bajragarhi, Suchetgarh, Pagowal, Chaprar, Muhadpur, Tilakpur,Thro Mandi, Khanpur Sydan, south east and east of Sialkot city, which were returned to Pakistan after the Tashkent Declaration in January 1966. Likewise, by the end of the hostilities, Pakistan held up to 1,600 square miles of Indian territory, of which 1,300 square miles included desert sectors.Despite the "huge losses on both sides", The Australian attributed the victory in this battle to Pakistan"...... by: Rao, K. V. Krishna..... Goodmorning dear

No offense, but if that so, then Pak leader were one of the most idiot in world who accepted status quo ante bellum.

my dear.. its not my thinking it is FACT....

Its a fact, then live with it, you people just cant, just cant go above the thinking from 1965. When we lost the war from China, we accepted that, and find out where we gone wrong. And you guys, still in ancient thinking that we can attack Kashmir as LoC is not international border.

Bro, grow up, and find out where you go wrong in 65.

It was not a disaster, that 1965 was a offensive operation for Pakistan, but in the end it become defensive op for Pak.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

Time to troll with some CIA propaganda -

The CIA report, in detail explains the secret agreement between India and Pakistani leaders to save India's prestige at the highest level and take the blame on Pakistan

 

[longlivepakistan_]

compare the population..Its just a matter of statistics

Haha, what a rationale... I don't see many Chinese here ...
You're always welcome in Pakistan...

 

[FarmanCH]

No offense, but if that so, then Pak leader were one of the most idiot in world who accepted status quo ante bellum.



Its a fact, then live with it, you people just cant, just cant go above the thinking from 1965. When we lost the war from China, we accepted that, and find out where we gone wrong. And you guys, still in ancient thinking that we can attack Kashmir as LoC is not international border.

Bro, grow up, and find out where you go wrong in 65.

It was not a disaster, that 1965 was a offensive operation for Pakistan, but in the end it become defensive op for Pak.

Dear China is still in Ladakh -A territory claimed by India- and IA is doing nothing and i can understand they can not go against China... Pakistan is ruling AJK again it is a territory proclaimed by Indians but still IA can do nothing.... 65's war was a historic win by an Army 4 to 5 times smaller as compared to Indian Army and it was started by IA to cover up its shameful defeat in the Run of Kach by the same Army... Pakistan was wrong in politics on the other hand; was strong on battlefield and still a symbol of domination in the world

how by capturing a commander jeep

no dear... by capturing 1600 sq miles of Indian territory including fort of Kishan Garh

 

[nForce]

Haha, what a rationale... I don't see many Chinese here ...
You're always welcome in Pakistan...

Why don't you ask the Chinese? I am sure they can speak for themselves..

 

[third eye]

Accept it with a pinch of salt. Just gulp it down quickly. This was pain will be less.

Salt does not help reduce laughter on reading a joke

 

[RiazHaq]

#Pakistan Air Force pilot M.M. Alam among 7 of the Greatest Flying Aces in World Aviation History - http://www.popularmechanics.com/flight/g2323/greatest-flying-aces/ … via @PopMech


A dogfight between two aircraft is perhaps the most fascinating type of combat. The technical knowledge and precision required to operate a fighter aircraft combined with the physical and mental strain of a dogfight make the fighter pilots who excel at them truly exceptional.

Unofficially, a flying ace is a fighter pilot who shoots down at least five enemy aircraft, though the number a single pilot can achieve has steadily decreased because anti-aircraft and tracking technology has made dogfights rare in modern warfare. From Erich Hartmann, the Nazi fighter pilot credited with the most aerial victories of all time, to Giora Epstein, the ace of aces of supersonic jet pilots, these men are among the most skilled fighter pilots to ever enter a cockpit.


Muhammad Mahmood Alam was a Pakistani Air Force jet fighter pilot in the Indo-Pakistani War of 1965. He was the last fighter pilot to become an ace in a day, shooting down five Indian Hawker Hunter fighter jets in less than a minute on September 7 1965, the last four of which he downed within 30 seconds. A national hero in Pakistan, Alam holds the world record for becoming an ace in the shortest amount of time. This bold feat also makes him the only jet pilot to become an ace in one day. Alam was already a respected leader and proficient pilot and gunner when the war started in April 1965. He piloted an F-86 Sabre and downed a total of nine Indian Hawker Hunters in the 1965 war, as well as damaging two others.

Top 7:

Manfred von Richthofen - World War I

Erich Hartmann - World War II

James Jabara - Korean War

Muhammad Mahmood Alam - Indo-Pakistani War

Charles B. DeBellevue - Vietnam War

Giora Epstein - Arab–Israeli Wars

Cesar Rodriguez - Gulf War