1. if this happens, how will bayrozgar generals and brigadiers get employment and destroy organizational budgets by using its resources ruthlessly?
2. "legislation" doesnt solve anything in Pakistan. many "autonomous" organizations are autonomous in name only and cannot even hire and fire peons independently.
You're exactly right.
Our problems go well beyond policy or legislation. There's a critical fault in our collective thinking, especially among our leaders (be it military or political or bureaucracy or courts). When the guys at the top don't think on the correct basis, the 'solutions' they come up with are generally going to be toxic problems.
Turks had the advantage of getting access to American systems from the very start including component building for F-16s. Pakistan had to turn to China and then incorporate western technology in Chinese equipment.
Having said and done, Pakistan still managed to make AK and JF-17 before Turks produced their MBT Altay and an aircraft TFX.
This has nothing to do with organizational structuring and policymaking.
Okay, let's say we only ever had access to Chinese equipment. Fine. Done. Why is PAC's day-to-day managed by senior PAF officers when there are retired PAF engineers (with PhDs and Masters in various aerospace fields) sitting in Boeing, Textron, and Raytheon? Why did PAC pursue reckless vertical integration (i.e., adding to its overhead for very low-value production work, like bolts that are already available from Pakistani makers)?
The Chinese themselves only have access to Chinese equipment, yet the likes of SAC, CAC, NORINCO, etc, aren't run by PLA generals. They're run by scientists and engineers.
Not everything in life boils down to who your suppliers or allies are. Yes, Turkey had the benefit of being exposed to a lot of Western technologies, but they could have easily messed it all up by making the same organizational mistakes our military did.
And finally, there's an earth and sky difference between the AK/JF-17 and Altay/TFX programs.
I'm not talking about the generational gaps, but the fact that the Turkish ones are exponentially more indigenous than AK/JF-17.
Turkey is designing the TFX's flight control system, developing the composite materials, and producing the entire sensor + electronics stack. Heck, even the air-to-air and air-to-surface weapons of the TFX are all indigenous. Likewise, the Altay will have not one, but two indigenous engine options: diesel and electric.
Heck, Turkey has more competency on the F-16 than we do with the JF-17. Both the Turkish public sector and private sector have manufactured aerostructures for the F-16 from scratch, for example. Turkey also understood enough to design its own F-16V-type upgrade (i.e., OZGUR) and carry out its own weapon integration work with, again, its own munitions technologies.