That is another name for weakness. It's semantics. Don't use weakness as a excuse to convert it into charity. It was the same Hindu weakness that saw the greatest pool of humanity being ruled for a thousand years by invaders from the West. I think you already know about your numbers. Even if you all spat you would have drowned any invader.
LOL, I knew you would come up with this weakness crap. Never consider Tolerance to weakness. If someone bigger than you doesn't intend to hurt you, don't take it for weakness, rather his tolerance.
Moreover it was never the Hindu Raja's who allowed the foreigners to set foot on Indian soil. Rather the treachery by the likes of
Mir Jafar's and
Mir Sadiq's who not only betrayed their King, but also the people of the nation. If not for the success in the
Battle of Plassey, the Britishers might have never set foot on Indian soil like they did back then. A classic example is the
Battle of colachel, it was the turning point in the history of India, which threw away the Portuguese out of the Indian soil making them confined to only Goa, and few coastal Islands. The same might have been the fate of the British if the Nawab managed to win the battle, but again a Hindu commander Mir Madan Lal embraced martyrdom fighting for the King and country.
I think you already know about your numbers. Even if you all spat you would have drowned any invader.
LOL, don't try to distance yourself from your history. It was not
you rather
we and our ancestors who where ruled by foreigners for 100's of years. How hard you may try to paint it otherwise.
It was the same tolerance of invaders that you display to Pakistan or you should have squashed a tiny country like Pakistan the way a elephant tramples over a coconut. But that is you guys. Lack of gonads.
Whatever you may think, but we never shied away from any war which was imposed by Pakistan on us, and on the contrary brought it to your own door steps that your forces had to end up defending your own cities. LOL
And you did not break up Pakistan in 1971. Geography, millions of Banglas created the cracks that you compounded. It was not Pak weakness that we lost. It was simple odds of geography, millions of Banglas, being thousand miles from home and facing 15:1 odds against IA. Even USA would have lost. They got thrashed by Vietcong just around the corner from Bangla.
You are 100% true here. It was never Pakistan's weakness, rather stupidity that you lost half of your territory. But does that make any difference ??? At the end of the day who lost is what really matter, not how.
