Inception-06
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2007
- Messages
- 4,172
- Reaction score
- 18
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
China can convert its Z-10 series into this with limited changes...Forget Ah-1z.
Let's go for this (yes it is a wish with no basis in reality as it is not yet in production and not in same weight class probably as well. Just throwing it out about future of attack recon helicopters a decade later).
Latest program of Bell.
View attachment 582169
http://news.bellflight.com/en-US/18...m=social&utm_campaign=FARA&utm_source=twitter
you are absolutely right but point is the what our ARMY thinking about this issue the army also evaluated Mi-28 in Russia some years ago but come is 0/0...IMO we should upgrade the existing Cobras and try a SLEP to the airframes where possible. But aside from that, co-develop and manufacture a 10 ton attack helicopter like the Rooivalk Mk2, ATAK 2 or the next gen Chinese one. Procure those bigger ones in numbers, better suited for CAS in the Eastern theatre. The T129 and Z-10ME are more or less LCH class. But one in between option is get TAI to develop a 7-8 ton ATAK (more rugged) on the TEI engine, and then license build 100+ of those in Pakistan
what are alternative engines for TAI-129 helo?IMO we should upgrade the existing Cobras and try a SLEP to the airframes where possible. But aside from that, co-develop and manufacture a 10 ton attack helicopter like the Rooivalk Mk2, ATAK 2 or the next gen Chinese one. Procure those bigger ones in numbers, better suited for CAS in the Eastern theatre. The T129 and Z-10ME are more or less LCH class. But one in between option is get TAI to develop a 7-8 ton ATAK (more rugged) on the TEI engine, and then license build 100+ of those in Pakistan
Their locally manufactured enginewhat are alternative engines for TAI-129 helo?
The only heavyweight attack helicopter semi-available to us is the Rooivalk. However, we'd need to co-fund its upgrade (Rooivalk Mk2), which will probably mean securing and integrating a new engine, transmission, avionics, and weapons. However, Denel said that whoever helps fund it, will get to manufacture the helicopter (and I think take over most of the production work). So, it's a win-win, assuming you can take the risk.you are absolutely right but point is the what our ARMY thinking about this issue the army also evaluated Mi-28 in Russia some years ago but come is 0/0...
The only heavyweight attack helicopter semi-available to us is the Rooivalk. However, we'd need to co-fund its upgrade (Rooivalk Mk2), which will probably mean securing and integrating a new engine, transmission, avionics, and weapons. However, Denel said that whoever helps fund it, will get to manufacture the helicopter (and I think take over most of the production work). So, it's a win-win, assuming you can take the risk.
That said, if it were me, I'd actually go for it. Of course, that'll mean finding a SLEP for our existing Cobras, but it's time to re-apply the PAF's thinking along the whole military.
Our leadership isn't going to pick fights, and where it can, it'll try avoiding a fight as much as possible.
Whatever one may think of this fact, at least from the standpoint of defence development, it buys us time. And the good thing about the Rooivalk Mk2, it's halfway there since Denel is re-using the same airframe.
Anyways, the reason why Denel had trouble exporting the Rooivalk in the past was because Airbus DS was trying to push its Tiger platform. That is not an issue today as Airbus DS has taken its foot off the Tiger program, and just as importantly, Pakistan is an Airbus DS customer via the H125/H125m program. Airbus also said it'll support the new Rooivalk program, so some kind of licensing fee element is involved. We can deal.
Alternatively, we can leverage some strings at Leonardo (having bought their AW139 and, potentially, another type for the PN) to get the transmission and other critical parts.
Besides that, the question of the engine is interesting. We can stick to the existing one (Malika), or talk to them re: the new Aneto-series. We can also take a two-phase approach, e.g., a Block 1 with the Malika, and then a Block 2 with the Aneto (and other improvements).
Imagine roadmapping a 120~180 aircraft requirement over 20 years and, in turn, manufacturing them gradually for local and export (we can market this solution to Brazil, Ukraine, etc).
Both are capable helicopters but AW139 has twice the power, speed, range, endurance and payload advantage. Its basically a better helicopter in every regard at a slight higher cost.