Pakistan: Armed attack targeting vehicles of Chinese company underway in Gwadar, Balochistan, Aug. 13

[hussain0216]

Balochistan belongs to the people of Balochistan. We cannot colonize them in the name of bringing development and prosperity. If Baloch people want to remain backward, let them be

No one cares if they are backwards,, everyone cares though if they don't allow development in the country, and murder and kill people through terrorism

It's the states responsibility to defend the borders, develop resources and bring development to citizens who want it

These dudes and tribals can live in caves if they want to,, but they have a desire to be terrorists and stop everyone else in the country or Balochistan to be developed

 

[M. Sarmad]

No one cares if they are backwards,, everyone cares though if they don't allow development in the country, and murder and kill people through terrorism

It's the states responsibility to defend the borders, develop resources and bring development to citizens who want it

These dudes and tribals can live in caves if they want to,, but they have a desire to be terrorists and stop everyone else in the country or Balochistan to be developed

So, what you are saying is that we need Balochistan land and resources (for the development of Pakistan), Baloch people living there can go to hell !! ... That exactly is what the Baloch nationalists say that Pakistan is interested in land and resources and not in the people living there.. They don't seem to be wrong about it

 

[Paji]

No one cares if they are backwards,, everyone cares though if they don't allow development in the country, and murder and kill people through terrorism

It's the states responsibility to defend the borders, develop resources and bring development to citizens who want it

These dudes and tribals can live in caves if they want to,, but they have a desire to be terrorists and stop everyone else in the country or Balochistan to be developed

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

 

[Dalit]

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

True. Indian oppressed minorities such as Naxalites, Dalits, Muslims and Sikhs are all freedom fighters.

 

[M. Sarmad]

True. Indian oppressed minorities such as Naxalites, Dalits, Muslims and Sikhs are all freedom fighters.

They indeed are

 

[TheSolution]

So, what you are saying is that we need Balochistan land and resources (for the development of Pakistan), Baloch people living there can go to hell !! ... That exactly is what the Baloch nationalists say that Pakistan is interested in land and resources and not in the people living there.. They don't seem to be wrong about it

Separatists should be annihilated no one gives a shit what they claim

 

[Paji]

True. Indian oppressed minorities such as Naxalites, Dalits, Muslims and Sikhs are all freedom fighters.

One man's freedom fighter is another man's terrorist.

 

[M. Sarmad]

Separatists should be annihilated no one gives a shit what they claim

We tried that in 1971, everyone knows how it ended for us

Political problems require political solutions, not military

 

[TheSolution]

We tried that in 1971, everyone knows how it ended for us

Political problems require political solutions, not military

1971 was half way across the map with India sandwiched in the middle

It doesn't take much effort to see the difference in today's geography

People like you have a defeatist and cucked mindset where you are ready to give up more than you are ready to fight

 

[M. Sarmad]

1971 was half way across the map with India sandwiched in the middle

It doesn't take much effort to see the difference in today's geography

People like you have a defeatist and cucked mindset where you are ready to give up more than you are ready to fight

Not willing to oppress and colonize weaker people is not a defeatist mindset, genius

It's a principled position to take

 

[hatehs]

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

If someone said this about Kashmiris, tum poojarion ki itni zor se phat ti, your entire slum block would be clogged with half-digested curry.

 

[Paji]

Balochistan has seen many insurgencies right since 1948. No Pakistani regime has been able to crush the freedom fighters despite employing the most brutal forms of repression.

If someone said this about Kashmiris, tum poojarion ki itni zor se phat ti, your entire slum block would be clogged with half-digested curry.

Kashmir has not had an insurgency for as long as Balochistan and for the most part it has been crushed after the Pak fauj decided it was in Pakistan's best interests to abandon the mujahideen in Kashmir.

 

[M. Sarmad]

Balochistan has seen many insurgencies right since 1948. No Pakistan has been able to crush the freedom fighters despite employing the most brutal forms of repression.

This definitely is not true. Pakistan has never employed "most brutal forms of repression" in Balochistan. Such attempts have been halfhearted at best with no political consensus to back up military action, and such efforts are nowhere near what India does in Occupied Kashmir or even Red Corridor (or China does in Xinjiang for that matter).

 

[Mugen]

Useless Napak army, can't do its job, and is now ruining the country. I hope these BLA or whoever else go after the generals and leave the poor soldiers and civilians alone.

 

[TheSolution]

Not willing to oppress and colonize weaker people is not a defeatist mindset, genius

It's a principled position to take

It's virtue signalling done by cucks, the strong today lament over this exact past of theirs, and others look up to them.

Every powerful nation has a brutal history. Because you can never reach a certain status without some necessary levels of brutality.

It's like Pakis who simp for all these past empires of Muslim rulers and Ottomans and what not, while drowning in their own inferiority complex because they didn't achieve anything and instead larp about mortality

Learn something from Turkey's attitude towards Kurds, that's how attitude to any separatist group should be. Anything else is just an expression of your weakness, whether you admit this or not.

If it's truly a moral stance, then you're just too naive for your own good