Ultima Thule
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2012
- Messages
- 16,725
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Improved and also more composite 8% for Block-2, 35% for Block-3 @KeysersozeSo in other words it will look like a JF17....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Improved and also more composite 8% for Block-2, 35% for Block-3 @KeysersozeSo in other words it will look like a JF17....
In other thread aerodynamics of suspected Block-3 is quite change, especially nose of the jet and block-3 is based on JF-17B as per various senior/professional members on PDF, which clearly have a different nose then standard JF-17 @Keysersoze
as i said block-3 is based on JF-17B, nose is one thing, vertical tail is swept back, more wing area, spine is also different etc etc @Keysersoze
may be radome has not externally change but internally has more volume, various members quoted this block-3 based on JF-17B (twin seater) which have all those changes according to them @Deino sirHonestly, AFAIK there is no change in the radome's size between the A and the B. At least I did not read any reliable report and even more have any clear photographic proof. These are by my understanding all wishes one reported and being picked up and reposted by others. You cannot simply change the radome's size without changing the whole forward fuselage and as reported both models share the same production line.
Please share one of these reliable sources You have in mind which say so?!
Also, again via all reliable info I have especially via reliable members here: the Block 3 will NOT look like a JF-17B, it will NOT have the swept-back tail and the spine.
I'm sure, that most of the ones who are eagerly awaiting big changes, major differences between the Blocks 3 & 3 will be disappointed and most fan boys won't notice the real differences at first sight.
I would be disappointed. I am hoping for a Gripen like evolution [emoji41]Honestly, AFAIK there is no change in the radome's size between the A and the B. At least I did not read any reliable report and even more have any clear photographic proof. These are by my understanding all wishes one reported and being picked up and reposted by others. You cannot simply change the radome's size without changing the whole forward fuselage and as reported both models share the same production line.
Please share one of these reliable sources You have in mind which say so?!
Also, again via all reliable info I have especially via reliable members here: the Block 3 will NOT look like a JF-17B, it will NOT have the swept-back tail and the spine.
I'm sure, that most of the ones who are eagerly awaiting big changes, major differences between the Blocks 3 & 3 will be disappointed and most fan boys won't notice the real differences at first sight.
Improved and also more composite 8% for Block-2, 35% for Block-3 @Keysersoze
Yes and will look like a jf17....Improved and also more composite 8% for Block-2, 35% for Block-3 @Keysersoze
I am more excited about what block III will be carrying rather than how it will lookHonestly, AFAIK there is no change in the radome's size between the A and the B. At least I did not read any reliable report and even more have any clear photographic proof. These are by my understanding all wishes one reported and being picked up and reposted by others. You cannot simply change the radome's size without changing the whole forward fuselage and as reported both models share the same production line.
Please share one of these reliable sources You have in mind which say so?!
Also, again via all reliable info I have especially via reliable members here: the Block 3 will NOT look like a JF-17B, it will NOT have the swept-back tail and the spine.
I'm sure, that most of the ones who are eagerly awaiting big changes, major differences between the Blocks 3 & 3 will be disappointed and most fan boys won't notice the real differences at first sight.
Date of this crash and any news reports related to it?
Not in the timeframe between the blocksI would be disappointed. I am hoping for a Gripen like evolution
And that is the point....people get too wrapped up in photoshop images..I am more excited about what block III will be carrying rather than how it will look
It was due to structural failure of the aircraft because of which the whole fleet was grounded.Sq. L. Mohammad Hussain's JF-17.
A bird hit, he ejected but the seat didn't work and parachute didn't open.
(Sadly) he embraced shahadat.
It was due to structural failure of the aircraft because of which the whole fleet was grounded.
There have been only two JF-17 crashes so far. This one you mentioned is the first JF-17 crash. The pilot is said to have ejected into the ground while his aircraft was inverted (S.No 10-127) not that his seat malfuntioned. I was asking you about the third crash. The second one is known to have been a JF-17 that crashed in the Arabian Sea on 9/27/2016 during High Mark exercises, though there has been no confirmation of the type of aircraft by PAF.
Besides these two, can you tell us what third crash I am missing?