anonymus
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2011
- Messages
- 3,870
- Reaction score
- -7
- Country
- Location
It isn't the need it is about the capability, how can you say that Pakistan don not have a second , third or fourth strike capability. Pakistani nukes are already more in number than india (as reported in all media and intelligence reports). Pakistan already have delivery systems through ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, air crafts and other means. With an extensive network of underground tunnel and deep bunkers for nukes, Y do you think that Pakistan won't reply after first strike in case of (God Forbade) any nuclear war.
And easily destroyable also.And don't forget that your enemies(India or Nato) would have absolute air superiority so chances that your missiles would be destroyed while preparing to be launched is high.
And you are of the view that Pakistan will sit idle after any such missadventure.
What if a country having missile defence system decide to take out your nukes with first strike?
A missile defence system is not perfect and cannot cope with large number of missiles coming towards it.So what if your enemies decide to degrade your nuclear capability with first strike survived your degraded response under it's nuclear shield.
Dude ground based nukes are considered to be the safest in the world. As the technologies for detection of submarine and means to counter them have under gone massive advancement in past two decades, it is comparatively much easier to detect and destroy a nuclear armed Submarine which is all alone in the open sea.
True for conventional SUBS but what about nuclear? They could remain submerged for months at end.You wont even know where it is.A nuclear SSBN could launch a missile toward pakistan from pacific.How would you detect something which is beyond reach of your detectors.
I hope they sent an empty missile with a note attached towards Dehli. I think that would have sent the message.
You must be joking.
It is impossible to tell difference between a Nuclear tipped or conventional missile.A Ballistic missile fired towards Delhi would lead to nuclear strike on pakistan.This is one of important reason to declare nuclear doctrine as in absence of one India would assume worst and act accordingly.The advantage that India has due to a declared doctrine is that if India fires a missile towards a weapon depot you can be sure that it contain conventional warhead.
India will possess neither the intelligence capability nor the military capability to take out all of Pakistan's nukes in a preemptive strike before Pakistan can respond, in the foreseeable future.
Heck, even the US cannot guarantee taking out all of Pakistan's nukes before a Pakistani nuclear retaliation regionally ...
But Enough so that the rest are intercepted by missile defence.
The Navy Strategic Force Command or NSFC will deploy nuclear weapons at sea, as the sea-part of the Triad - which will be part of our second/third strike reserve.
Are you planning to put nukes on Conventional SUB?
Do you have SLBM's?
Pakistan's nuclear doctrine is to attack first if we feel any threat to our existence we will launch all nukes to destroy enemy completely first its open secret , yet not declared by GVT but any one can understand its simple.
How would you conceal such a large movement and fuelling of your missiles from Satellites?