Well ! you may not consider it but it was diplomatic defeat of your founding fathers , at the time of before independence they were fully against the demands of Pakistan, most of British india administration were belongs from current india origin, while Pakistan's origin were ignored at then , The demands of muslims rights (seperation of Bengal , seperate electorial campaign, 1\3 representation on cabnet, central and local level etc) weren't accepted by congressmen and Britishers at then which lead us to demand partition at then.
Pakistanis and seperate tribes here aren't confused about theirselves But Indians seems to be, as their claim continues to change according to their psyche conditions , You are still combining seperate heritages of Pakistan as its reflects your Lack of knowledge on subject which you are trying to discuss here. Atrocities were part of local Dharmic Raja's culture , they got massive armies at then too but Failed against our armies and became Slaves of us. even after different time intervals They tried their level best but again incompetent against real art.
Bengalis were your part before partition and were our part before liberation, Indeed your millions of soldiers were the resistance provider against 48000 Soldiers and rest of all administrative units, InFact they consider I.Gandhi hero at then, but wat happens later? She supported Tamilians terrorism in Lanka , stabbed by her own gaurd as reaction of blue star. Decrease in intensity of ties with Bangladesh, even they seeks China as their major partner? Even now you hate Bangladeshis those who had migrated to india. (as an ally you should've supported them till the end) .
Kargil : 12 posts out of 134 accoring to your hardcore sources and 4 posts according to neutral sources you managed to captured, all and all it was your intellegence Failure, IAF didn't performed according to missions , Lost of soldiers , specially in 14th june attack on pt 4590. Total incompetency in Batalik sector , and still failed to secure NH-1D. Is that called Vijay diwas?
first thing our founding fathers fought for independence of India and they wished we stay united, but you did not wished to do so , so with reluctance we agreed to give you what is rightfully yours , a portion of land which we all shared . I don't see any victory or defeat in that . if I say see it from gandhis eyes it was like a son ( Pakistan ) asking asking his share of property , obviously he wanted him to stay united with him and his brothers but you refused.. so both brothers are given their share.. I am not going into what happened after that .
I know that a minority of Pakistanis are descent of Persian war lords who conquered India ( all of today Pakistan and half of India ) .. now if a Pakistani shouts 1000 years rule on todays Indians he is shouting it on his own fellow Pakistanis who were defeated , tortured , raped , forcefully converted etc .. but while trying to take cheap shots they are forgetting that fact that they are humiliating almost entire Pakistani population.
now come to Bangladesh liberation part , there you don't have any leverage no matter how ever you play with words.
agree before partition we all were one , but after partition , be become a separate state , Bangladesh was your part , but you did not treat people there as equals , so they revolted against you , you attacked them , they fled to India , we offered money , men. and training .. we successfully liberated them .. your army surrendered.today also we have very good relations with Bangladesh govt : which is elected by Bangladeshi people.
LTTE was just one of the org who were fighting for srilankan Tamils and I Gandhi supported them in their beginning stage.
later on LTTE deviated from it's route , they were not ready to accept nothing less than a new nation which rajiv never accepted. they become power greedy and eliminated other Tamil org who were fighting for the same cause , so the cause of LTTE was genuine ( you may read srilankan Tamil plight that time.. same as Bangladeshis ) but later they deviated , targeted innocents , killed their own people etc which made them slip into the category of terrorist org and India was the first to recognise then as such.
about Bangladeshis..well hospitality has limits.. when somebody come home and ask you shelter we give them assuming they go back when things are settled , we not only accommodated then but we helped them getting back their home, and if still they won't leave what can I say about them.
kargil according to our sources we managed to capture 70% -80% territory. considering it is an official figure we can safely assume that least 50% territory would have been recaptured.. and that does not mean that we would not be able to re capture remaining territory militarily if needed , it simply means by the time we captured 50%( to be neutral ) territory the war ended because you were not able to withstand international pressure because of your shameful act.
casualties for sure has happened on both the sides, for us the casualties were the price we paid to regain our lost territory, for you the casualties just went useless because you were not able to keep what you captured.. or rather stolen.
yes surely it was an intelligence failure we did not expect such a back stab from Pakistan while we were negotiating peace.
national highway is safe and secure .
1999 Kargil Conflict
??
You know well the state of affairs in both our respective states and in other countries of our region ... I am not only denying that 4000+ figure because it is said by a corrupt person with zero credibility who has done nothing for the country ... I am denying it because it impossible that 4000+ men died in a low intensity conflict ... Had there been 4000 dead , do you really think PA or GoP would have been able to hide it even for a short period of time 
