Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
it'd be great if you provide that link...
well sajjad lone a separatist leader contested to the mainstream elections; this is an clear indication that the so called separatist leaders have lost their hold and people have given a clear mandate to omar abdullah......
its simple the air has changed with % of voters going above 50%... people of kashmiris are no more kashmiris but INDIANS...
Not a good sign. Also not surprised with the open support of terrorism here, this is still JUD, the not so different front. A recent survey showed 45% Pakistanis think LET is a good org
Ya its alright talking smack about mumbai attacks (unethical, but you guys are religious, you know better), in reality this is gonna bite you in the tender parts, then you can talk more smack.
man come on. y would we lik anyone who kills innocent ppl. but tell me onething. y should a judge give judgement against someone if no proof is found. u r atleast sure about one thing that now our judiciary in not under gov control. it does wat is rit.
I only quoted a survey, it has been posted here. Also, I was responding to members here who were proudly calling 'mumbai just the start', praising indian embassy bombing etc etc. I hope you read those posts.
You are right that this decision could be a technical one based on how the case has been built up / what evidence is available etc etc. But I'm skeptical because JUD was run by the same people in the same compound when LET was supposedly banned, I hope you understand why I'm skeptical.
Well your country has done more than praise, they have provided the Talibans in Pakistan with money and weapons. If the Indians keep this up, dont cry like a little bit** if bombs blow up in Delhi, Bombay, Calcutta, Madras
Why do you kill Kashmiris, torture them, shoot in demonstrations? Is that ur free world?
Perhaps, but its also because most Pakistanis believe that the Mumbai attacks were carried out by India, and not the LeT. That support mentioned in the survey is not for terrorism or an organization that commits terrorism - it is for an organization largely considered to be primarily fighting against Indian forces in Kashmir, and not carrying out terrorist attacks.Not a good sign. Also not surprised with the open support of terrorism here, this is still JUD, the not so different front. A recent survey showed 45% Pakistanis think LET is a good org
godsavetheworld:
Infact all ATM meetings before 26/11, had India giving proof of Pakistani involvement in blasts in India, while Pakistan could muster nothing on the high table
India has never had evidence implicating Pakistani institutions in terrorism
American intelligence agencies have concluded that members of Pakistan’s powerful spy service helped plan the deadly July 7 bombing of India’s embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan, according to United States government officials.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/01/world/asia/01pstan.html
Its clear as daylight who is 'occupying' Kashmir and who is supporting their freedom. Pakistani media handled the immature Indian offensive after Mumbai attacks with great professionalism. Unlike the Indian side, nobody in Pak jumped to conclusions or did any excessive whining or bellowing.
However India gained reputation for being a warmongering state which easily jumps to conclusions and simply whines a lot. Indian Army itself did more damage than the terrorists, and Israel confirmed this by demanding an investigation.
I think the whole incident made India come across as an obstacle to Pakistan's commitment to the war on terror, hence the word Kashmir began popping up all over Washington.