What's new

Pak Ex-Gen admits killings of 3 million Bangladeshis

Status
Not open for further replies.
Again Why don't you bring up these "credible evidences" in international communities like we do ?? . Have RAW in filtrated your political leadership to such an extent or what ??
Ok! Wat could be the credible evidences according to you, your own RAW agents caught in Pak, or Indian style ammunation recovered and money recovered, or indian lobby in U.S supports for Balochistan militia? or Mukti bihani the whole indian proxy, If that wouldn't be a credible for u then wat could be? tell me please?
 
. .
<i>Niazi planned rape of Bangalee women for ethnic cleansing</i>

In 1971, General AAK Niazi threatened that he would let loose his soldiers on the women of East Pakistan till the lineage or ethnicity of the Bangalees was changed, according to a new book.

Maj Gen (retd) Khadim Hussain Raja, who was general officer commanding of 14 Division in the then East Pakistan, gave the account in his book titled A Stranger in My Own Country: East Pakistan, 1969-1971, published by Oxford University Press this year.

The book is posthumously published probably because it was a hot potato in the times it was actually written, reports Pakistan based The Express Tribune on July 8.

Page 98 of the book reads, &#8220;[Enter] Commander East Pakistan General Niazi, wearing a pistol holster on his web belt. Niazi became abusive and started raving. Breaking into Urdu, he said: Main iss haramzadi qaum ki nasal badal doon ga. Yeh mujhe kiya samajhtey hain. He threatened that he would let his soldiers loose on their womenfolk. There was pin drop silence at these remarks. The next morning, we were given the sad news. A Bengali officer Major Mushtaq went into a bathroom at the Command Headquarters and shot himself in the head.&#8221;

General Tikka Khan disagreed with Raja that Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman be secretly dispatched to West Pakistan. He wanted to &#8220;publicly try Sheikh Mujib in Dhaka and hang him&#8221;, it also said.

The Express Tribune report opens with, &#8220;Pakistan's name has been blackened by just one man: General AAK 'Tiger' Niazi.&#8221;

It adds, "Niazi surrendered to Indian General JFR Jacob in 1971. Niazi handed over his personal pistol at the famous Race Course ceremony. Jacob examined the weapon: the lanyard was greasy and frayed, and the pistol was full of muck as if it hadn't been cleaned in a long while." (Surrender at Dacca: Birth of a Nation; by Lt Gen JFR Jacob; Manohar Publishers 1997).

General Ayub Khan, whose decade of rule caused the jurisprudence of separatism to evolve, gets the treatment he deserved through the testimony of another not-too-civilised general named Gul Hassan.

&#8220;Gul Hassan openly criticised Field Marshal Ayub Khan's sons who, according to him, were letting their father down by amassing wealth by unfair means. Gul Hassan blurted out that 'I have told the old **** that this time we will impose Martial Law and take control ourselves but not protect Ayub and his henchmen'. The reference [old ****] was to General Yahya Khan, commander-in-chief of the Pakistan Army&#8221; (Page 8).

The only leadership criterion was brutality riding on low IQ. The exception was General Yaqub Khan, the commander who insisted that General Yahya not postpone the session of the National Assembly elected after the 1970 election.

The author writes: &#8220;All of a sudden, General Yaqub Khan was bundled off as a student on the Imperial Defence College course. This clumsy and unceremonious action was obviously taken to get him out of the way&#8221; (Page 7).

Major General Rahim Khan was the other officer Pakistan can't be proud of: &#8220;Rahim started to criticise the senior commanders in Dhaka, especially me, although I happened to be a friend of his. He was of the opinion that the Bengalis were timid people and should have been subdued long ago. The reader can judge for himself the ignorance and lack of understanding of the East Pakistan situation among the hawks in the armed forces&#8221; (Page 97).

Rahim ran away from East Pakistan when things became too hot.

Niazi also asked Raja for phone numbers of his Bangalee girlfriends: &#8220;Abhi tau mujhey Bengali girlfriends kay phone number day do&#8221; (Page 99).
 
.
Indian Philosophy;;;;;;;

524142_281274455313026_702895907_n.jpg
 
.
Thanks for attempting but not a single mention of any Pakistani General stating 3 million civilians were killed, this leads me to conclude the source stating that was not Gen. Khadim Hussein Raza but the Indian source.
 
.
Between December 1970 and March 1971, Bengali nationalists subjected non-Bengali minorities, especially Biharis, to systematic persecution. It is estimated that between 15,000 and 50,000 Biharis were killed during this period, and is believed by some that elements of the Mukti Bahini, with active support from the BDR and intelligence, committed massacres against the Biharis.[11]R J Rummel estimated that 150,000 non-Bengals were massacred by Awami League aligned militias, with a low estimate of 50,000 and a high estimate of 500,000.
Wikipedia
So Indian supported militants killed nearly 50000 to 500000 non bengalis, Now how indians react on it ? let see
 
.
creation on Bangladesh was on two nation theory. If two communities cannot live together, they should separate.
 
. .
Bull **** indian toilet news, noe where written in Book that General admitted. Newpaper should be sued for this bullshit. For Indians, go read you own Arundathi Roy book on bangladesh!
 
. .
Indian source with news targeted towards illiterate Indians.
 
.
I wonder where Luffy 500 is? Gone hunting for Pakistani generals or cuddled in his hole??

I wonder why newspaper didn't showed the paragraph where it is written 3 million claim? You indians are habitual for Toilet News.. I don't why indians here are happy with this Toilet news may because of their fondness of toilet which is rare in india
 
.
I dont know what the "moderators" of this "Pakistan (?!) defence forum" are doing! they should immediately ban everyone, especially indians, mentioning the 3 million figure and and should delete all such threads....3,000,000! there were 55,000 regular in EP (east pakistan) in 32 battalions each with a rifle strength of roughly 400 = less than 13,000 riflemen; even if we dragoon personnel form other arms, no more than 15,000 riflemen could have been scrounged from this.
90 % percent of the dead bengalis were killed by indian army terrorists [disguised as muktis] and the muktis [ most of the active members of which were bengali hindus and WEST bengali hindus posing as east bengalis] ...
@ moderators -- what are you promoting here? bharati terrorist propoganda under the guise of free speech? this figure (3 million) is impossible under any circumstances --yes terrorist acts were commited by pakistanis but these were mniscule in number compared to bharati terror --- as I always said --try all terrorist sbut include indian army terrorists (including those who pplanned the terror operations) and the muktis who slaughtered pakistanis even after the surrender ......
 
.
Wikipedia
So Indian supported militants killed nearly 50000 to 500000 non bengalis, Now how indians react on it ? let see

Freedom Fighters killed them buddy not India. And Pakistan has always supported "Freedom Fighters". You even support Balochi freedom fighters and that's why your govt brought in NATO to kill your own soldiers. Remember Salalah? If Americans can bomb their own WTC why not Pakistan?
 
.
I wonder why newspaper didn't showed the paragraph where it is written 3 million claim? You indians are habitual for Toilet News.. I don't why indians here are happy with this Toilet news may because of their fondness of toilet which is rare in india
*Chuckle*Offtopic posts will lead nowhere.................Better luck trolling next time dude!!:lol:
Especially since we, unlike you, have no problem in accepting that this is a problem and have budgeted billions of $ to solve the problem. I could have highlighted many greater problems in Pakistan, but fortunately for you, I am not a troll.:wave:
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom