What's new

Pak envoy says no safe havens for terror in his country, US can’t stop laughing

Still there won't be any policy change by USA. So enjoy these videos while they last. :)

Agreed .
US wont change their policy.
But your bargaining chip will grossly reduce.
 
. . . .
But is that tag good for you?
Practically they didnt give much respect to your diplomat. He is a respectable person.
But it was his justification for his motherland that caused this embarrassment

stop being drama queen, we are good with it, we can cause same or even more embarrassment to US ambassador in any Daesh, Al Qaeeda, Taliban related meets/confernce in Islo... We too can laugh our *** off when he utter that america is fighting terror.. Nothing serious...

Now take a chil pill and dont try to create storm in a teacup.
 
. .
stop being drama queen, we are good with it, we can cause same or even more embarrassment to US ambassador in any Daesh, Al Qaeeda, Taliban related meets/confernce in Islo... We too can laugh our *** off when he utter that america is fighting terror.. Nothing serious...

Now take a chil pill and dont try to create storm in a teacup.

But honestly can you do that by inviting US ambassador for a program in Islamabad ?
That is the real question.

EPIC fail attempt. Backing and believing this news headline makes you an idiot, sorry to say.

I believe this news .
But backing ?never ,ever .
Audience should also maintain their decorum.
 
.
After the osama incident , the world stopped to trust Pakistani words.
 
.
But honestly can you do that by inviting US ambassador for a program in Islamabad ?
That is the real question.

oh i thought you were trying to be drama queen but you are really a low IQ person of special needs. quote any doctor not me.
 
. .
Actually, Americans always knew whom and what they are dealing with. It's their national interest only and not any devotion for a terror free world that shapes their foreign policy.

actually American also know when and how bharati sponsored terror through out its history and against whom.

its upto Pakistan to make itself relevant to US policy makers. rest of America can laugh as much as they want.
 
Last edited:
.
Well these days it's the whole world that is laughing at these American clowns....


Pakistan’s top diplomat in the US was laughed at by a Washington audience when he repeatedly insisted that there are no safe sanctuaries for terrorists in Pakistan and that the Taliban leader, who reportedly died in a hospital in Karachi, never left Afghanistan.

“What is there funny about,” a visibly irritated Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhry, the Pakistan ambassador to the US, told a Washington think-tank audience which burst into laughter when he repeatedly argued that Mullah Omar never left Afghanistan to visit Pakistan.


The reality is, however, different, argued former US diplomat Zalmay Khalilzad, who served as his country’s ambassador to Afghanistan, Iraq and the UN.

“We have very firm evidence of his (Mullah Omar) presence in Pakistan, where he went, lived, ..hospital,” he said, adding that for a long time there was the idea that bin Laden never left Afghanistan.

“There is ample evidence that while the operation was going on, Haqqani network was being evacuated to safer location,” the former US ambassador to Pakistan said during a panel discussion on ‘Regional Perspectives on the US Strategy in Afghanistan’, at the Atlantic Council’s South Asia Center.

Chaudhry appeared to be isolated as two other panellists - former Indian minister Manish Tewari and top American think-tank expert Ashley Tellis - joined Khalilzad to say that terrorist safe havens continued to exist in Pakistan and there was a level of support from the Pakistani establishment.

“What sanctuaries you are talking about? If you want to live in the past, you cannot solve the present. Haqqani and the Taliban are not our friends. They are not our proxies. What Quetta Shura you are talking about? What Peshawar Shura?” the Pakistan ambassador questioned. The panel discussion had an abrupt end as Khalilzad and Chaudhry exchanged words.

Tellis said while the safe havens continue to exist in Pakistan, a great deal of financial and personnel supply does come from Afghanistan. But there is no denying that the Taliban leadership were based in Pakistan, he said.

Tewari said it was time that Pakistan should introspect as to why the Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, who went to Rawalpindi to meet the Pakistan Army chief, turned against Pakistan. Ghani was actually constrained to say Pakistan is having an undeclared war with Afghanistan.

“Those are extremely strong statements coming from the head of state,” he said.

During the question and answer session, an Afghan diplomat, Muhammad Asad, and an Afghan woman journalist Nazira Karimi of Ariana television joined the three other panellists to challenge Chaudhry’s assertion about terrorist safe havens.

“Our allegation is evidence-based,” Asad said adding that while the carrot formula has not worked, it is time for the US to look the other way around.

The Pakistan ambassador said his country wanted a peaceful, stable, sovereign and prosperous Afghanistan.

“Afghan soil should not be used against Pakistan. Other than that, we want to facilitate reconciliation. ..Just blaming Pakistan all the time will not help. What will help is recognise what Pakistan has done for Afghanistan,” he said.

Chaudhry accused India of being a part of a “double squeeze strategy”.

“India does have strategic interest in Afghanistan. It could be part of the double squeeze strategy against Pakistan. To that end an Afghanistan that is not stable would serve India’s purpose and that is why India is opposing reconciliation with Taliban of any kind,” Chaudhry said.

Chaudhry also accused India of trying to be a “hegemonic” power in the region


https://www.google.co.in/amp/m.hind...aughing/story-Ji6p4aQ9boVI2WMRzji4JP_amp.html
 
.
its upto Pakistan to make itself relevant to US policy makers. rest of America can laugh as much as they want.
Pakistan has so far dealt with the Americans quite cleverly. American foreign policy has since the days of Roosevelt been shaped by the idea that individual friendship can always influence national policies and this had traditionally been exploited by Pakistani elites quite well.

Neither there is any indication of the Americans shifting from this particular way of negotiating; so, I am not expecting anything that would go drastically against Pakistan.
 
Last edited:
. . .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom