MastanKhan
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2005
- Messages
- 21,269
- Reaction score
- 166
- Country
- Location
I still don't agree on JH-7B. We need to look forward not backword.
We must increase the production rate of Jf-17 block 2 and 3 from 16 to 25 per years and if still need more then another production line can start in China.
For twin engine fighter, J-11x/J-16x is the best solution.
Hi,
First priority is what you can get---second is ---is it a stable platform---third does it have a capable EW suite---fourth is can it carry a good load---.
The JH7 is based on the F111 and Jagura minus the wing adjustments---so the design is potent---. It has been in service for lesser years than the F16---.
Design is the least of the worries for the defence of pakistan--. The need is a capable aicraft wityh a good EW suite----and a good loiter time and range.
The 60 years old B52 is still a deadly strike aircraft and so is the B1---.
Not all show & pomp is GLORY.
What matter is reality. Hypothetically every fighter can take down any other fighter provided suitable environment.
Hi,
Indeed reality matters---.
But for any fighter to take out any other fighter---you cannot sustain on a one in a thousand chance----.
Your potency level needs to be within and above the 90% compatibility range for the current aircraft---and for the 5th gen aircraft---you need to be within 97% and above range.
It is all about situational awareness---to start with and then the potency of your weapons---.
The enemy will fight---engage and disengage from HIS position of strength---you have to have to have the ability to strike from the outer periphery or get inside of his position of strength without it knowing---.
Just remember--As you have a God who looks over you---the enemy also has a God that looks over him.