IceCold
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- May 1, 2007
- Messages
- 19,236
- Reaction score
- 10
- Country
- Location
You dont just fire the missile at its max range and be done with it. That is not how it works? And Migs have a very large combat radius compared to anything we got so yes my argument remains valid. PAF lacks legs to provide decent air cover to our ship assets and also to keep IN from blocking karachi.If your aircraft is launching a missile with 550km range (raad) how good is that mig cover???
By the way thats what this article is arguing stand off weapons and although i do agree with most he said kindly appreciate u are arguing exactly opposite
Future is of stand off weapons and it will be difficult to defend with missiles and Migs...
Take syria. For example where s 400 is being humiliated on daily basis
And Syrian example is not valid in case of India and Pakistan. S-400 is not being humiliated its a tact understanding between two superpowers to stay clear of each other and not to engage each others assets. Besides even if i take your word of being humiliated being true (which it is not) americans are using F-22 and Israelis F-35, please tell me which stealth 5th generation fighter does PAF operate currently that we will use against India?