Game of evidences, Eh?
PAF Claims:-
- Ground strikes inside IOK (Real footage of the bomb shown to world)
- 1 xMig-21 down (Proven)
- 1 xMi-17 Fratricide (Proven)
- 1x Su-30 down (Not proven)
IAF Claims:-
- 300 terrorists killed (No footage available with IAF + Satellite imagery seen by the world)
- F-16 Down (Not proven)
The only disputed things are Su-30 and F-16.
Now lets come down to it:
Supporting points for PAF Claim:-
We all know that 2 planes were shot down that day, now what could be the other plane if
1. Abhinandhan didn't fire any missile (All four missiles available for any independent analyst to see)
2. Foreign Policy report of US count showing no F-16 lost
Supporting points for IAF Claim:-
Hell nothing except DG ISPR's statement of 2 pilots
which later he corrected and clarified on multiple occasions.
Note: Please dont talk about those 2 takkay ki slides IAF showed as radar signatures lol
Now how do you like this game of evidences?