more like the AGM-88A.
and MAR-1 is a derivative of the US missile.
Id stick to the D, because the D includes both GPS aided correction with the EM sensor which MAR-1 has. Range may be close to the 88A.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
more like the AGM-88A.
and MAR-1 is a derivative of the US missile.
Any fucking one?Apart from the radar and DRFM, what's the difference between this upgrade and the CAPES upgrade?
@Oscar @Manticore @Horus @gambit
The main point will be the radar of these F16s.
Its my request to all members on PDF dont compare JF17 with "State of the Art" fighters. If something new in PAF doesnt mean its so called STATE OF THE ART. Even our Old F16s have MORE and more potential more power more accuracy and better much better this JF17. Kindly stop comparing JF17 or feel happy on this JF17 technically PAF go for this only because of replace F7 Pgs and rest of oldz. JF17 not even capable to front any 4 or 4.5 even not front line fighter.
About F16 simply we should go for more or change this platfrom to some other but 4 ++ 4.5. We already much lcking in fighters.
The JF-17 is certainly better than our non upgraded F-16 block 15's, and are certainly comparable to even our block 52's. In fact, the designer of the MIG-29 himself said the JF-17 is about as good as the MIG-29 for only a fraction of the price. The JF-17 can certainly compete with 4th gen fighters like the J-10, F-16, HAL Tejas, MIG-29, Mirage-2000, etc. But not with the likes of Rafale, Eurofighter, F-15, SU-30, etc until block 3 arrives with the AESA radar.
Also, keep in mind PAF pilots are some of the best in the world. A PAF pilot flying a JF-17 could likely handle an IAF pilot flying a SU-30.
It doesn't mean that Fighter like F-7P can down Rafael,PAF is lacking in technology in Future.