Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am not playing any victim card.yes I am sure about our f-16 kill.i can't ignore radar data whether you call it handwritten or whatever.i am not here to change your views or others.they are just my views but giving negative rating for specific views is wrong.as far as su-30 kill is concerned,I think tall guy has already explained things to me so kindly relax.
Relax buddy.lol
I am not playing any victim card.yes I am sure about our f-16 kill.i can't ignore radar data whether you call it handwritten or whatever.i am not here to change your views or others.they are just my views but giving negative rating for specific views is wrong.as far as su-30 kill is concerned,I think tall guy has already explained things to me so kindly relax.
Relax buddy.lol
Lol. Temperatures are very high in France. So it’s hard to relax lol.
About the data shown about F16 cleaned with vanish powder, i think you should have a look about the capabilities with photoshop in the hands of experts. Once a female collegue of mine asked me if i was able to remove a person from a picture. I said i never tried but it should be possible with time.
She gave me her picture from which she wanted to remove another women who was smarter/cute than her.
I said ok. After 2 weeks i presented her the result of my work. She was sooo happy that if i didn’t had stopped her she would had kissed me. Thanks to Allah I was prepared to any misbehaviour from her.
But the result was very good. And I’m not a photoshop expert at all.
So I let you imagine what can do experts with photoshop.
So data shown not really a credible evidence.
I don’t know who you are Arsalan but your arguments are pretty childish and your logic is flawed. You are basically repeating nonsense Indians are spreading .
I don’t know how to give you negative rating but I would give you big thumbs down.
the fact that all the 4 missiles of the mig21 were found unfired, one fused to the crashed mig21 wreckage doesn't mean anything, aye? if you are so convinced on their (your) iaf's claim on the F16 issue, then care to explain how exactly did they shoot it down? if you are to believe their ms-paint job, then even that shows that the distances were far too create for close in gun fight...I am not playing any victim card.yes I am sure about our f-16 kill.i can't ignore radar data whether you call it handwritten or whatever.i am not here to change your views or others.they are just my views but giving negative rating for specific views is wrong.as far as su-30 kill is concerned,I think tall guy has already explained things to me so kindly relax.
Relax buddy.lol
Is there any incident in the past where India hide something from Pakistan? I don't remember anything and I feel that su-30 is a very big plane so it's hard.i can't deny Pakistani or indian narrative but our case is weak because there is absolutely no evidence.anything would be assumption but I am sure we lost a plane because the radar data was from awacs and it clearly showed targets so it's obvious for me to trust radars data.radar data might be corrupt or wrong but the jet that went down near loc was seen by all so indian narrative is still strong.
Final call ......... answer these Qsyes I am sure about our f-16 kill
Those radar images can be created by IAF to face saving, the lost of signal from their radar doesn't means you have a 100% solid proof for downing our F-16, you can also consider other possibilities to, Azad kashmir/IOK is mountainous areas if our F-16 can go low level they lost our F-16 signals, there also possibility that our ECM aircraft (Falcon-20) can spoofs/ jam indian radars so they lost the signal of our F-16 etc etc, its a controversial claim by an IAF, and other possibilities you should also consider, that radar images aren't 100% solid proof of downing of our F-16 @Arsalan 345I am not playing any victim card.yes I am sure about our f-16 kill.i can't ignore radar data whether you call it handwritten or whatever.i am not here to change your views or others.they are just my views but giving negative rating for specific views is wrong.as far as su-30 kill is concerned,I think tall guy has already explained things to me so kindly relax.
Lol. Temperatures are very high in France. So it’s hard to relax lol.
About the data shown about F16 cleaned with vanish powder, i think you should have a look about the capabilities with photoshop in the hands of experts. Once a female collegue of mine asked me if i was able to remove a person from a picture. I said i never tried but it should be possible with time.
She gave me her picture from which she wanted to remove another women who was smarter/cute than her.
I said ok. After 2 weeks i presented her the result of my work. She was sooo happy that if i didn’t had stopped her she would had kissed me. Thanks to Allah I was prepared to any misbehaviour from her.
But the result was very good. And I’m not a photoshop expert at all.
So I let you imagine what can do experts with photoshop.
So data shown not really a credible evidence.
The way I see it, PAF CAS and ISPR claim two kills, out of which one is confirmed and the other unconfirmed. IAF claims one kill which is unconfirmed. The only fact verifiable is one Mig21bis kill. As far as the strikes, IAF's debrief was plain jane, where it did not claim on any number of casualties, it claimed successfully hits, again the keyword being claimed, without any BDA released, that too remains a claim and not a verifiable fact. Ministry of defence never released an official statement, but a politician claimed the 300 number so that to me was never a contention of significance. (akin to Nawaz Sharif claiming 4000 casualties, don't know how much weight people here would assign to it)Ok then please tell me who should we believe your air chief or ministry of defence? Whose version is the true one?
It's not strong enough evidence to prove anything conclusively.Is there any incident in the past where India hide something from Pakistan? I don't remember anything and I feel that su-30 is a very big plane so it's hard.i can't deny Pakistani or indian narrative but our case is weak because there is absolutely no evidence.anything would be assumption but I am sure we lost a plane because the radar data was from awacs and it clearly showed targets so it's obvious for me to trust radars data.radar data might be corrupt or wrong but the jet that went down near loc was seen by all so indian narrative is still strong.
It has been released a long time ago.when are you releasing the full Hamadoor Rehman Commission report?
It did."India attacked in 65"
Siachen was Kargil in reverse."No army regulars in Kargil"
What kind of stupid statement that is?And capturing a pilot in your own territory is par for course. Imagine Germans lauding themselves for capturing British pilots over Germany in Ww2.
So far, it's been you who is not making excuses but instead, dodging all the criticism of India's contradictory, preposterous and flawed claims.You can make as many excuses as you like.
It has been released a long time ago.
Can be downloaded for free.
It did.
Ever heard of Raan of Kutch?
Ever heard of Haji Peer Pass?
We don't consider IOK as part of India, we attempted to retake our own territory before it could become too late---thanks to massive military aid from West post 62.
India OTOH attacked across international border.
Siachen was Kargil in reverse.
I am yet to see an Indian criticize the role of Indian army in causing massive suffering for both countries(more so for India) as far as Siachen is concerned.
Kargil bari jaldi yaad a jata hai --- Shuru tou tum ne Kiya tha
What kind of stupid statement that is?
Comparing WW2 to 21st century border engagement?
Incase you forgot, we breached your airspace with more than 12 aircraft and as per Sikh civillians in Jammu, kept circling overhead for quite some time----If shooting down was so easy------
Mr Moustache was shot down as soon as he entered our airspace. He paid for his folly, you make him a hero.
You should be questioning the caliber of TACDE graduate and his superiors for presenting us with an opportunity to humiliate India.
So far, it's been you who is not making excuses but instead, dodging all the criticism of India's contradictory, preposterous and flawed claims.
Brings in 65,71, Kargil, WW2 and whatnot instead of digesting the fact that India got it's behind handed to her on a platter by a force much smaller in numbers and finances.
When the entire world is accepting Pakistan's version of events despite a lack of soft image.
1. How long after your debacle in 71 was it published? And even then, I don't think the full report was ever published.
2. In 1965, you were supposed by agreement to respect the sanctity of the LoAC. You breached it. You attacked Indian troops and expected that India won't retaliate. As usual, you were wrong. And you went to the UN asking the world to stop India. Check out the Bhutto video again.
Siachen was undemarcated. I think you briefly occupied it before India took you down.
Compare a pilot shot down over enemy territory. John McCain, he is considered a hero too. But as I said, you wouldn't know much about heroes.
Lol - which Sikhs saw you over Jammu?
It's useless to talk here.they gave me negative rating just because I raised questions about su-30 claim.they will give you negative rating as well if you challenge their narrative.i mean where is the wreckage of su-30? No body in the world can hide such a big plane and tallguy even claimed 3 su-30 went down.i mean this is crazy.
You were also sure of capture of Akhnor salient by IA. Is it still in the hands of Indians?yes I am sure about our f-16 kill
Kargil: Point 5310...'nuf said!kargil: point 5353...'nuf said!