What's new

Pacific Ocean has ample space for China and the US, said China's Xi

China is 'ready' to share Pacific Ocean but is not so forthcoming when it comes to Asia.
 
.
The Vice President forgot someone didn't he? The US has been monopolising the Pacific only for the last 20 years. Before that the Americans had to contend with the Russian Pacific fleet operating out of Vladivostok and Kamchatka. Even earlier, it was the Japanese who called the shots in this region. Today the Japanese are in no position to dominate anything but the Russian Navy is rapidly adding muscle. Russian SSBN patrols off the US Pacific coast as well as the Atlantic coast have been going on for a few years now. This is an area in which China is still deficient. As the new Borei class SSBNs and Garney class SSNs start arriving, the waters of the Pacific will be further muddied. I doubt Russia is as yet ready to lie down and die. China as yet does not possess the tools for ocean domination, though it is getting there. As of today, China's navy is capable of only a limited domination of the South and East China Seas. China will be ready by 2030 when it has all three/four carriers going and also adequate surface combatants and more effective submarine fleet. Therefore, the US in the near future will be sharing the Pacific not only with China but also, increasingly, with Russia.

you have a good point, Russia is still a fairly big player in the new future.
 
.
As for me, I used to work around nuclear weapons during the Cold War days and I mean being in a 'no-lone zone'...

Is it true that in the 'no-lone area' both men carries pistols and is authorized to shoot the other if the other one gets a little cranky or refuse to follow the order.
 
. .
Over looking is correct. We have satellites looking over the Pacific. We have AWACS looking over any fleet. We have subs looking over Chinese subs and the Chinese submariners do not even know we are looking over them.
China is too big a regime that USA could handle with. Look at those small and powerless countries you attack, Iraq\Afganistan\lybria. So strong of you military power, Wow!! Great job you have done, congratulations!
 
.
China is too big a regime that USA could handle with. Look at those small and powerless countries you attack, Iraq\Afganistan\lybria. So strong of you military power, Wow!! Great job you have done, congratulations!

Imperial Japan was a much bigger power than Communist China and US destroyed it singlehandedly. Also sometimes direct confrontation is not necessary to destroy the enemy (Cold War). So pls don't underestimate your rival.
 
. . .
South China Sea has ample space for China, India and US. No?

You're really worth your fabulous User name, idiotic troll. Don't bring your insignificant country to a superpower deut.

India is A small player at best. Embassy attack in Delhi yestoday explain the "insignificance" of India' in world stage. Imagine attacking Israel embassy in Beijing or Washington DC.
 
.
You're really worth your fabulous User name, idiotic troll. Don't bring your insignificant country to a superpower deut.

India is A small player at best. Embassy attack in Delhi yestoday explain the "insignificance" of India' in world stage. Imagine attacking Israel embassy in Beijing or Washington DC.

Touched your nerve there ha...
 
.
"Pacific Ocean has ample space for China and the US"

Translation: "You say on your side, we stay on our side"

LOL at people who can't comprehend international affairs



Imperial Japan was a much bigger power than Communist China and US destroyed it singlehandedly. Also sometimes direct confrontation is not necessary to destroy the enemy (Cold War). So pls don't underestimate your rival.
LOL at slaves jumping to the master's defense.
 
. .
"Pacific Ocean has ample space for China and the US"

Translation: "You say on your side, we stay on our side"

LOL at people who can't comprehend international affairs



LOL at slaves jumping to the master's defense.

its all good.. just justified americas presence in sth china sea also... china welcome to send ships to pacific etc... in fact usa would probably be more comfortable having you near.. they can keep very close watch on you and know that if something happened.. ur ships.. would be in ruin very very quickly lol
 
.
its all good.. just justified americas presence in sth china sea also... china welcome to send ships to pacific etc... in fact usa would probably be more comfortable having you near.. they can keep very close watch on you and know that if something happened.. ur ships.. would be in ruin very very quickly lol
LOL....... a 3 megaton nuclear blast over melbourne would be serve China's long-term strategic interest.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom