Tps43
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2016
- Messages
- 4,960
- Reaction score
- 16
- Country
- Location
Seriously man?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seriously man?
What r u talking about mate? A helis sound gives it position away from kilometers, its not meant to be stealthy.
Why not some Kamovs
Counter-rotating rotors are used to eliminate the tail fan as the torque gets cancelled but the blades are elastic entities to minimise the weight and reduce the aeroelastic influences. However no other helicopter manufacturer uses this design other than Kamov. I don't recall any such design from Sikorsky, Augusta, Bell etc..There is a fatal design flaw in the Ka-50/ 52's. The contra-rotating blades as far apart as they are placed still manage to impact each other during extreme maneuvering. This has happened a number of times resulting in total destruction of the rotors!.........perhaps rigid blades are the answer.......but it has put a damper on the purchase of these awesome beasts, even by the Russian army aviation. The Ka-29's/ 31's/ 32's also use this contra-rotating design however they are far heavier and much less maneuverable hence they haven't seen these types of catastrophic accidents.
Not 100 % Sure .. But look like Ataka-V or Shaturm ATGM@Sulman Badshah in the 4th pic there is an arrow pointing at some missiles which one are those?
Counter-rotating rotors are used to eliminate the tail fan as the torque gets cancelled but the blades are elastic entities to minimise the weight and reduce the aeroelastic influences.
camo can be changed.. it is a paint job.Dont like its camo tbh
camo can be changed.. it is a paint job.
Yeah that's what I tried to explain that why does it happen so you're right it is flawed design..Looks good for experimental birds but not for production units. If counter-rotor design was successful, we would be seeing a lot more such choppers from all major manufacturers. It is more like the swept forward wing for a/c's..which has some advantages but has a weight penalty and structural issues that outweigh any benefits.Yes.......but in the case of the Ka-50/ 52's they clash/ impact frequently resulting in catastrophic destruction! Has happened a number of times already.There are already strict limitations of certain maneuvers on the Ka-50/52 drivers.......on what and what not they can do.
Yeah that's what I tried to explain that why does it happen so you're right it is flawed design..Looks good for experimental birds but not for production units. It counter-rotor design was successful, we would be seeing a lot more such choppers from all major manufacturers. It is more like the sweep forward Aircraft..which has some advantages but has a weight penalty and structural issues that outweigh any benefits.
Well, let's see..however Kamov does not seem to be on any shopping or even wish list of PAA. They will be happy with AH1z and T-129s and also I guess some Z10MEs are coming as China improved it quite a lot after the feedback from PAA.True, but a well flown Ka-52 within its parameters is still a fine machine......it still is a dangerous attack helo. Last reports from Russian forums indicate the introduction of a new and improved control system to avoid rotor impact during extreme maneuvering. The Russians will eventually sort it out.
Sir that FLAWED design is the future.US Next Gen Line.Yeah that's what I tried to explain that why does it happen so you're right it is flawed design..Looks good for experimental birds but not for production units. If counter-rotor design was successful, we would be seeing a lot more such choppers from all major manufacturers. It is more like the swept forward wing for a/c's..which has some advantages but has a weight penalty and structural issues that outweigh any benefits.
which one?Sir that FLAWED design is the future.US Next Gen Line.
Twin Rotors + 1 propeller in back for speed.
I think he is talking about sikorsky S97 raiderwhich one?
Next gen is AH66 RAH and it is a single rotor design with shrouded tail rotor.
The troop-carrying version is capable of airlifting eight paratroopers with personal weapons.Out standing news how many troops can be carried at one time ?