Over 87,000 Indians Gave Up Citizenship Till June This Year: Jaishankar

[ProudThamizhan]

View attachment 940593

this guy not allah but gmo monkey man.

Now you’re also insulting Allah

 

[ARMalik]

Because we don't allow dual citizenship, you do.

Looks like your "Indian High Class Education" does not give you "comprehension skills" or maybe it simply gives you high class skills to Lie from your teeth !

 

[CallSignMaverick]

Hold on right there . What did the Indian write that they don’t receive Aid ??

Lying fucks ,

View attachment 940582

And actually Aid has increased to the slum by 70%

Questions over Britain’s 70pc boost in aid to India just days after its rocket launch​

Critics say it is wrong to increase funding to the Asian country when it is wealthy enough to afford its own space programme

ByDaniel Martin, DEPUTY POLITICAL EDITOR18 July 2023 • 10:00pm

Questions over Britain’s 70pc boost in aid to India just days after its rocket launch

Critics say it is wrong to increase funding to the Asian country when it is wealthy enough to afford its own space programme

www.telegraph.co.uk

​

• British aid to India will rise from £33.4million last year to £57million next year
• It comes amid intense government effort to finalise a new trade deal with India

British aid to India is set to jump by 70 per cent, despite repeated pledges from ministers to axe it.

Figures buried in the Foreign Office’s annual report show that aid to the fast-growing economy will rise from £33.4 million last year to £57 million next year in spite of growing pressure on the public finances.

If calling investment as aid makes it aid then UK has India as its 2nd largest aid provider

India holds on to position as second-largest source of FDI for UK

The UK economy showed its underlying strengths, attracting investment from around the world. The US continues to be our biggest investor, with India second, said the Department for International Trade

www.livemint.com

UK should be thankful for this "aid" from India as well

https://twitter.com/x/status/1681867130604748801

Looks like your "Indian High Class Education" does not give you "comprehension skills" or maybe it simply gives you high class skills to Lie from your teeth !

Instead of coping here, fact check my "lie", else take the L and seethe .

There is only rape stan populated by gandu hanumans like you Mr Ramu. So, how many rapes in manipur today?

And pedodeshis like you raqibool, how many rakhails you sent over to sonagachi today to earn money?

If you want to cry like a whore go to your eunuch PM modi and tell him your problem. We dont go to your rapestan. You rapestani hanumans yourselves flee your hellhole.

Says a kangladeshi who's country runs on fencejumping because of which almost 1 out of every 10 kanglus live and work outside their shithole because they don't have anything to do except stitiching chaddis in chaddidesh.

LOL, ask your gandu hanuman mom who is your father. rapestani gender ratio is fuked...

Says a halala ki paidaish turdskinned kanglu k2a produced in a brothel

 

[protean]

Looks like your "Indian High Class Education" does not give you "comprehension skills" or maybe it simply gives you high class skills to Lie from your teeth !

Even after producing so many articles, why do you guys have comprehension issues. India doesn't allow for dual citizenship and those who are applying for a different passport has to surrender their Indian passport as such their citizenship rights. With OCI card, the person and his descendants can freely enter India, purchase non agricultural properties. However most importantly they will loose all rights bestowed on Indian citizens by constitution including voting rights. We don't know how else to spoonfeed you illiterates.

 

[mangochutney]

If calling investment as aid makes it aid then UK has India as its 2nd largest aid provider

India holds on to position as second-largest source of FDI for UK

The UK economy showed its underlying strengths, attracting investment from around the world. The US continues to be our biggest investor, with India second, said the Department for International Trade

www.livemint.com

View attachment 940617

UK should be thankful for this "aid" from India as well

https://twitter.com/x/status/1681867130604748801

Instead of coping here, fact check my "lie", else take the L and seethe .


And pedodeshis like you raqibool, how many rakhails you sent over to sonagachi today to earn money?

Says a kangladeshi who's country runs on fencejumping because of which almost 1 out of every 10 kanglus live and work outside their shithole because they don't have anything to do except stitiching chaddis in chaddidesh.

Says a halala ki paidaish turdskinned kanglu k2a produced in a brothel

You Indians live in a cloud cuckoo land

How is Tata investment Aid lmao that is business , so what your saying is Pakistanis also give U.K. aid instead of investments

My gosh everything is trickery for you fools
Hold this and read this

Britain’s aid programme to India is fragmented, lacks a clear rationale and does little to counter the negative trends in human rights and democracy in the country, the government’s aid watchdog has found.
The findings are likely to be used by those who claim the UK government risks using its aid programme to deepen its relationship with India, including seeking free trade deals, rather than attempting to reduce poverty, which is the statutory purpose of UK aid.

The UK does not use its aid programme, enshrined in a joint roadmap signed by India and the UK in 2021, to support Indian democracy and human rights, despite backsliding in this area under the premiership of Narendra Modi, the review says.

One BII study found only 30% of those benefiting belonged to the bottom 60% of India’s population by income. One major investment in an Indian bank, intended to expand financial services for the poor, in fact led mainly to expansion of the bank’s credit card business and corporate lending.

The UK overhauled its aid programme to India in 2011 in response to the expansion of India’s economy and falling rates of extreme poverty. A decade ago, India was the largest recipient of UK bilateral grant aid, with annual funding peaking at £421m in 2010, but that figure fell to £95m in 2020.
A Foreign Office spokesperson said: “Since 2015 the UK has given no financial aid to the government of India. Most of our funding now is focused on business investments which help create new markets and jobs for the UK, as well as India. UK investments are also helping tackle shared challenges such as climate change.”

If calling investment as aid makes it aid then UK has India as its 2nd largest aid provider

India holds on to position as second-largest source of FDI for UK

The UK economy showed its underlying strengths, attracting investment from around the world. The US continues to be our biggest investor, with India second, said the Department for International Trade

www.livemint.com

View attachment 940617

UK should be thankful for this "aid" from India as well

https://twitter.com/x/status/1681867130604748801

Instead of coping here, fact check my "lie", else take the L and seethe .


And pedodeshis like you raqibool, how many rakhails you sent over to sonagachi today to earn money?

Says a kangladeshi who's country runs on fencejumping because of which almost 1 out of every 10 kanglus live and work outside their shithole because they don't have anything to do except stitiching chaddis in chaddidesh.

Says a halala ki paidaish turdskinned kanglu k2a produced in a brothel

Hush your urine soaked lips Indian

I give you Aid , get in your lane you third world mutt lmao

 

[CallSignMaverick]

My gosh everything is trickery for you fools
Hold this and read this

Yes, and it is you who needs to re-read whatever you posted. UK govt investing in India isn't any sort of aid, and India doesn't need any of that.

Most of our funding now is focused on business investments which help create new markets and jobs for the UK, as well as India

Utter shamelessness

 

[mangochutney]

@CallSignMaverick

UK gives India £2.3bn in aid despite pledge to stop handouts

Government’s aid watchdog critical of large sums being sent to middle-income country ‘without a convincing link to poverty reduction’

www.telegraph.co.uk

Yes, and it is you who needs to re-read whatever you posted. UK govt investing in India isn't any sort of aid, and India doesn't need any of that.


Utter shamelessness

Lol

Dr Tamsyn Barton, chief commissioner of ICAI, said: 'India was the 11th largest recipient of UK aid in 2021, receiving more aid than countries like Bangladesh and Kenya, so it is all the more important that every penny is well spent or invested.

But on Tuesday the

Independent Commission
for Aid Impact (

ICAI
), which scrutinises UK government aid and is independent of the government, in its review ofUK aid given to India, stated, “We calculatethat the UK provided around £2.3 billion in aid to India between 2016 and 2021.” This figure includes £441 million in bilateral aid, £129 million in development investment via the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (

FCDO
), £749 million of aid through multilateral organisations and £1 billion in investments through British International Investment (BII), the UK’s development finance institution. “BII is the world’s oldest development finance institution, established in 1948 as the Colonial Development Corporation with a mission to do good without losing money,” the report states. It has a portfolio of 389 investments in India valued at £2.3 billion in 2021 — by far its largest country portfolio at 28% of the total.

 

[mangochutney]

India, the British public were told, is a powerhouse that has moved up the international economic league achieving middle income status. It could and should do more to tackle its own poverty, and it doesn’t need outside help.1
But when you look beneath the headlines about India’s space programme and burgeoning economy, you find a country that is home to a third of the world’s poor people and that cannot afford to eliminate domestic poverty.
There are more than 400 million people in India living below the global extreme poverty line of $1.25 (69 rupees, £0.77; €0.95) a day— more than the combined total populations of the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom.2 Even taking account of the small but growing number of super rich elite, India’s average income per head is just $3650, a 10th
of that for Great Britain, comparing gross domestic product per capita using purchasing power parity to adjust for different costs of living.3
The needs of poor people in India are no different to people living in Africa or anywhere else—shelter, food for their families, drugs when they get sick, schooling and with it
the chance of a better life for their children. Although we have 61 billionaires, in India 217 million people will go to bed hungry tonight.4 5
There is not enough money among India’s elite to help such a vast number of poor people. Nor is there sufficient money among the middle classes. Martin Ravallion, director of the World Bank’s development research group, has calculated that even if the Indian government confiscated every last rupee from every Indian living on more than $13
a day (the US poverty line) and gave it all to people living on less than $1.25 a day it would eliminate only “a modest fraction” of Indian poverty.

 

[CallSignMaverick]

investments

Ab to sharam kar le

 

[mangochutney]

Ab to sharam kar le

I see you miss out the poverty destitute part lol

Well let’s see what the British public says in comments to a leading U.K. newspaper

Micky MOJO, London, United Kingdom, 4 months ago
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/reportAbuseInComment.html?articleId=11856025&commentId=966505693
One day our politicians will be held accountable for squandering our money like they're kids in a sweet shop


MathsStats, The Alps, Switzerland, 4 months ago

Population of India 1.3billion. Nearly 1billion of them are poor. So thats 2 pounds for each poor person. What do they do with that 2pounds? They spend it and the rich in India get richer and the poor stay poor. Basic economics.

1. 
   Ray Caltot, Stavanger, United Kingdom, 4 months ago
   https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/reportAbuseInComment.html?articleId=11856025&commentId=966473205
   Why are we giving money to a nuclear power with a space programme?
   02
2. 
   Commenter22, Worcester, United Kingdom, 4 months ago
   https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/reportAbuseInComment.html?articleId=11856025&commentId=966456007
   What on earth are we doing? They have a huge space program worth millions. We also send millions to China. What a joke.
   

Mike Omment, Everywhere and nowhere baby, United Kingdom, 4 months ago
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/reportAbuseInComment.html?articleId=11856025&commentId=966472839
So why are will still giving them these handouts?

Box clever, Northampton, United Kingdom, 4 months ago
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/reportAbuseInComment.html?articleId=11856025&commentId=966471129
This is the country that has sided with China and Russia. Also has a space programme


lincs28muk, Lincoln, United Kingdom, 4 months ago

Maybe India should stop spending money on its space program and get its priorities right of feeding its people as well as investing in education and healthcare.


queenbee, South, United Kingdom, 4 months ago

Why are we giving aid to a country that has nuclear weapons and a space programme?


ToastedCheese, UK, United Kingdom, 4 months ago
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/reportAbuseInComment.html?articleId=11856025&commentId=966395859
This should not be happening. This is our money, the government has no right to be giving it away like this.


Stanley Bunfluff, Manchester, United Kingdom, 4 months ago
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/reportAbuseInComment.html?articleId=11856025&commentId=966507017
The overseas aid budget is another thing that needs a clinical cross party evaluation. It's mystifying how some countries get so much.


Julie Matt, Castleford, United Kingdom, 4 months ago

Time this stopped. We have our own homeless people, families not able to feed their kids properly. Our pensioners not able to heat their homes and keep warm. Charity begins at home. Once as a country we are sorted maybe them look at helping others. but not until we are looking after our own first

1. 
   Stuart, Bradford, 4 months ago
   https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/reportAbuseInComment.html?articleId=11856025&commentId=966495139
   India spends 1.9 billion pounds on their space program, why do they need our money
   09
2. 
   Everymanoftheworld, manchester, United Kingdom, 4 months ago
   https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/reportAbuseInComment.html?articleId=11856025&commentId=966493255
   Not again...does this country never learn, this is OUR MONEY, STOP sending it to all and sundry to line their pockets..!
   09
3. 
   Charleighkent18, Hull, United Kingdom, 4 months ago
   https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/reportAbuseInComment.html?articleId=11856025&commentId=966489125
   You don't say ! Our taxes should be spent here end.
   19
4. 
   johnbilly, Derbyshire, United Kingdom, 4 months ago
   https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/reportAbuseInComment.html?articleId=11856025&commentId=966433127
   Money should stay in UK , and help with NHS which is in a mess!!
   

 

[GodToons]

Hold on right there . What did the Indian write that they don’t receive Aid ??

Lying fucks ,

View attachment 940582

And actually Aid has increased to the slum by 70%

Questions over Britain’s 70pc boost in aid to India just days after its rocket launch​

Critics say it is wrong to increase funding to the Asian country when it is wealthy enough to afford its own space programme

ByDaniel Martin, DEPUTY POLITICAL EDITOR18 July 2023 • 10:00pm

Questions over Britain’s 70pc boost in aid to India just days after its rocket launch

Critics say it is wrong to increase funding to the Asian country when it is wealthy enough to afford its own space programme

www.telegraph.co.uk

​

• British aid to India will rise from £33.4million last year to £57million next year
• It comes amid intense government effort to finalise a new trade deal with India

British aid to India is set to jump by 70 per cent, despite repeated pledges from ministers to axe it.

Figures buried in the Foreign Office’s annual report show that aid to the fast-growing economy will rise from £33.4 million last year to £57 million next year in spite of growing pressure on the public finances.

Aid UK send is given to NGOs aligned with the UK govt agenda. India, since 2011, has stopped taking any grants and since 2013 is a net grant donor.

Now do something so that your govt can stop asking for wheat as a grant to feed your population.

India, the British public were told, is a powerhouse that has moved up the international economic league achieving middle income status. It could and should do more to tackle its own poverty, and it doesn’t need outside help.1
But when you look beneath the headlines about India’s space programme and burgeoning economy, you find a country that is home to a third of the world’s poor people and that cannot afford to eliminate domestic poverty.
There are more than 400 million people in India living below the global extreme poverty line of $1.25 (69 rupees, £0.77; €0.95) a day— more than the combined total populations of the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom.2 Even taking account of the small but growing number of super rich elite, India’s average income per head is just $3650, a 10th
of that for Great Britain, comparing gross domestic product per capita using purchasing power parity to adjust for different costs of living.3
The needs of poor people in India are no different to people living in Africa or anywhere else—shelter, food for their families, drugs when they get sick, schooling and with it
the chance of a better life for their children. Although we have 61 billionaires, in India 217 million people will go to bed hungry tonight.4 5
There is not enough money among India’s elite to help such a vast number of poor people. Nor is there sufficient money among the middle classes. Martin Ravallion, director of the World Bank’s development research group, has calculated that even if the Indian government confiscated every last rupee from every Indian living on more than $13
a day (the US poverty line) and gave it all to people living on less than $1.25 a day it would eliminate only “a modest fraction” of Indian poverty.

Even based on your selected part - Nowhere it mentions that govt of India is taking the Aid. The UK is giving aid to its agents to further its agents in India. While your govt is taking the Aid to purchase the wheat for your people. Now go in queue else wheat will be over and you have to wait for next shipment.

 

[mangochutney]

Aid UK send is given to NGOs aligned with the UK govt agenda. India, since 2011, has stopped taking any grants and since 2013 is a net grant donor.

Now do something so that your govt can stop asking for wheat as a grant to feed your population.


Even based on your selected part - Nowhere it mentions that govt of India is taking the Aid. The UK is giving aid to its agents to further its agents in India. While your govt is taking the Aid to purchase the wheat for your people. Now go in queue else wheat will be over and you have to wait for next shipment.

No where it says india is taking Aid . Lol​

Fucking lying indian cunt as usual

 

[NG Missile Vessels]

India, the British public were told, is a powerhouse that has moved up the international economic league achieving middle income status. It could and should do more to tackle its own poverty, and it doesn’t need outside help.1
But when you look beneath the headlines about India’s space programme and burgeoning economy, you find a country that is home to a third of the world’s poor people and that cannot afford to eliminate domestic poverty.
There are more than 400 million people in India living below the global extreme poverty line of $1.25 (69 rupees, £0.77; €0.95) a day— more than the combined total populations of the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom.2 Even taking account of the small but growing number of super rich elite, India’s average income per head is just $3650, a 10th
of that for Great Britain, comparing gross domestic product per capita using purchasing power parity to adjust for different costs of living.3
The needs of poor people in India are no different to people living in Africa or anywhere else—shelter, food for their families, drugs when they get sick, schooling and with it
the chance of a better life for their children. Although we have 61 billionaires, in India 217 million people will go to bed hungry tonight.4 5
There is not enough money among India’s elite to help such a vast number of poor people. Nor is there sufficient money among the middle classes. Martin Ravallion, director of the World Bank’s development research group, has calculated that even if the Indian government confiscated every last rupee from every Indian living on more than $13
a day (the US poverty line) and gave it all to people living on less than $1.25 a day it would eliminate only “a modest fraction” of Indian poverty.

UN praises 'remarkable' India as 415 million exit poverty levels in 15 years

In April, India surpassed China to become the world’s most populous nation with 142.86 crore people, according to UN data.

www.google.com

National Multidimensional Poverty Index- A Progress Review 2023

Based on the latest National Family Heath Survey [NFHS-5 (2019-21)], this second edition of the National Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) represents

www.undp.org

India has almost wiped out extreme poverty: International Monetary Fund

In India, the number of people living in extreme poverty -- defined by the World Bank as living on US$1.9 or less in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms -- was 0.8% of the population in the pre-pandemic year 2019, stated the IMF paper, published on April 5, 2022.

www.google.com

Food subsidies prevented rise in extreme poverty during COVID-19 in India: IMF

The new paper ‘Pandemic poverty and Inequality: Evidence from India’, published in IMF, authored by Surjit Bhalla, Karan Bhasin and Arvind Virmani aimed to study the effect of in-kind food subsidies on poverty and inequality.

www.google.com

World Bank Praises Indian Govt For Taking Special Policies For Poor During Pandemic

World Bank President, David Malpass said that, the way India has provided help to the poor and needy people during the covid 19 pandemic crisis is extraordinary, , world bank, government of india, COVID-19 Pandemic

www.businessworld.in

 

[GodToons]

No where it says india is taking Aid . Lol​

Fucking lying indian cunt as usual

ah!! what to say to necrophilic.

 

[VkdIndian]

India has stopped accepting government to government aid in the last decade or so, except times of natural calamities.

This decision was taken after realising that nations giving even small donations, thought that they had a right to give instructions on the aspects of governance and otherwise. That was the time, this decision was taken and now it is almost zero.

Most of the data in the last decade would show reducing trend and becoming almost zero (government to government).

Aid does come in, but to various NG agencies and UN run schemes in which government helps with data etc, nothing more. A big chunk of these NGOs, have their religious agendas which is everything else except development.

India does manage to get loans at very reasonable rates from many agencies and countries, mainly Japan. That is due to decent track record of fiscal management.

There have been enough discussions and threads on this aspect on PDF.
There is unequivocal data to prove that donations have stopped coming to India. Not boasting or decrying Paksiatn but even a decade back Paksiatn was taking many times more aid PER CAPITA.

Some people try to peddle old data to try and prove otherwise.