Pakistani Fighter
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2011
- Messages
- 9,124
- Reaction score
- -5
You did. But I didn't understand that sheep and wolf thingWhich one?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You did. But I didn't understand that sheep and wolf thingWhich one?
Read post 25.What justification?
I don't really like to discuss these topics (I have better things to do then discuss what sluts really want) as it gets everyone's panties in a bunch for no reason. Where have I been wrong? Well you tried to raise some points so let me answer them.
Yes, there are rules that all good women should adhere to. I didn't make them, and they exist in all countries including the United States. Sure there are a few loud feminists who make the ridiculous argument that all sex is rape, and there are the men who enable these loudmouths.
But a good woman shouldn't cross a certain line. Going to a man's room in a hotel alone, and spending whole night there definitely falls under that category. If she's been fornicating of her own free will, then she should not cry "rape rape" at the same time, just because she got paid less or whatever reason (there's definitely some reason. The women never accuse you of false rape without a personal reason). No legal jurisdiction will buy her cockamamie stories.
When did I say that? You're putting words in my mouth.
Even a woman who's fornicating deserves legal recourse if she had been seriously injured by a violent man.
Or if it was under coercion, e.g. a male boss forcing a female employee for sexual favours, and she stands at risk of losing her job for not acceding to his demands.
Every case is different. I personally judge women who cavort freely very poorly, but I don't mix my views with the legal system.
A whore is a whore. It was just an expression. She behaves like a sex-hungry slut, and later accuses the man of false rape.
She's the lowest of creatures. But I never said that should make her suffer legal disabilities. The point is, she can't prove her imaginary rape stories in a court of law. End of story.
It's OK. See above, a good woman should always know her limits, and not act like a cheap slut. If she is one, she is no better than a common whore. Period.
It's most likely an educated guess, maybe money was involved.
But there may be other motives. Again, see above. No woman makes a false rape accusation unless she wants to extract something from the male victim.
Please elaborate on the social perspectives of a Brahmin. I want to understand how a Brahmin thinks from you.
You did. But I didn't understand that sheep and wolf thing
Any logical reason behind this?
Read post 25.
@Joe Shearer It's ok, take it lite. I think I overreacted after @Naofumi posted that article.
NO feminist, whatsoever, makes the argument that sex is rape.
The moment you define some women as good, you are sitting in judgement on them, and deciding what is good and what is bad. How did you get to do that?
See above,. You either have a social order, or you don't. You either have the sanctity of marriage, or you don't.Why should she be a 'bad' woman because she goes to a man's room in a hotel alone, and spends the night there? Whose laws are these, and who entitled these to be unctuously proclaimed by self-appointed guardians of society?
I am. Most certainly I am. PRECISELY because you are putting motives and assigning character to women using your own criteria. You are putting rules and caging them. Isn't putting words into your mouth a lesser offence?
This is where you sink through the drain-hole. How do you define 'injury'? You do realise where this is going?
The woman has a right to complain to her father, husband, or HR department if she is under that kind of pressure in a job. If she's willingly sleeping with her boss, then she WANTS something in return. Maybe a promotion?What if whether she stands at risk of losing her job or not cannot be determined?
Same things. Already covered.I would be delighted to learn from you how to legally discriminate between the behaviour of the sex-hungry and those not sex-hungry. What criteria would you use for this determination, apart from your evidently superior judgment?
Socially, in your set of norms, perhaps. And your point is entirely wrong. Ask any legal expert. End of story.
We can. Women should be put in their place, otherwise they will lead men astray left, right, and centre. There has to be a certain limit to their freedoms.The point is that you cannot decide for her,nor can anyone else. Period.
I am dealing with it in a spirit of clinical detachment. In this entire thread, the contributions of @saiyan0321 constitute the cream.
There exists a reason why that very famous statue wears a blindfold
LOL this thread was a ride.
LOL. Very nice. But of late, I am getting more and more fascinated by the sword she wields.
It is a discussion developing in my mind between the use of illegal means to enforce the rule of law, and the strict adherence to the law to the extent of permitting visible crimes to be committed.
There were very serious issues at one level, but yes, it turned out to be a turbulent ride.