Osama Dead. Obama Confirms.

[AcesAreDirty]

Now would be a good time for pisshead Zardari to resign and enjoy remaining of his life in 1 of 30 mansions he has in Oxford with his new wife!!!

 

[T-Faz]

Now would be a good time for pisshead Zardari to resign and enjoy remaining of his life in 1 of 30 mansions he has in Oxford with his new wife!!!

What has Zardari got to do with this?

It was our hijra Army and ISI which is root of all problems in this nation.

Edit: No offense to Hijra's intended.

 

[xTra]

^^^
Boss, You are on fire today.

 

[VCheng]

from: Pakistan and Afghanistan, after bin Laden: Badly spooked | The Economist

WOKEN by the deafening thump of rotor blades, Haji Bashir Khan crept onto his roof and watched, under a warm and moonless sky, as American special forces stormed his neighbour’s compound. “Yes, we were scared—we don’t have terrorism here,” says the restaurateur. He heard shooting and screams, then felt an explosion as a grounded helicopter was destroyed. The blast broke his bedroom window and strewed blackened bits of the chopper over a nearby wheat field.

Mr Khan and others in Abbottabad, a garrison town north of Islamabad, say the raid that killed Osama bin Laden lasted for 40 minutes and Pakistani soldiers turned up only after the Americans had departed. That delay, even though three army regiments are camped on a base just a few minutes’ stroll away, and the ease with which helicopters swooped in from Afghanistan, suggest some limited Pakistani co-operation. The government, braced for public anger or revenge attacks by jihadis, al-Qaeda or otherwise, says grimly that it was caught unawares by the raid (though it also claims, somewhat confusingly, to have given some intelligence help beforehand).

Much harder to swallow are its claims that Pakistan’s blundering spies had no idea that the world’s most wanted terrorist had been living, probably for years, not in a remote cave on the Afghan frontier but cradled in the arms of retired and serving generals in the pleasant, hillside town. It prefers to plead incompetence, since it would be far more painful to admit the alternative: that Pakistan's secret service, the Inter-Services Intelligence directorate (ISI), or rogue elements within it, had long harboured Mr bin Laden and that Pakistan’s leaders only acquiesced in his killing, if at all, moments before the Navy Seals did the job.

Pakistani complicity is the likelier explanation. Mr bin Laden might well have had the gall to risk hiding in plain sight by the military cantonment in Abbottabad, where residents say they regularly submit to identity checks and police visits at home. Yet his prolonged stay at a specially built, high-walled compound, with many of his family flocking in from Yemen, required a network of help. That he had relatively few guards on the spot also suggests he trusted others for security. So it is unsurprising that, to the growing fury of Pakistani spies, many informed observers conclude he must have had help from the ISI.

Either way Pakistan, and especially the ISI, now looks deeply humiliated. India’s hawks crow that their bitter rival can never be trusted; noisier American congressmen want to slash the $3 billion in military and civilian aid that America sends to Pakistan. President Asif Zardari and other civilian leaders have floundered in their response. Relations with America that were already cool, especially between spy agencies, have turned icy as criticism of the ISI grows.

Spooked, the Pakistanis are already warning the Americans not to consider any more such raids. But it is clearly a tempting prospect. An obvious next target would be Mullah Omar, the ageing Afghan Taliban leader, whom the ISI is also accused of protecting. American agents snooping in Pakistan’s cities in the past year may have turned up other useful leads but chosen not to act until Mr bin Laden had been dealt with. Some conspiracy theorists even fret that the Americans could go after Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal.

Usually smooth-speaking ISI men have been giving garbled accounts of what Pakistan was up to. More telling is the gobsmacked silence of their boss, General Ashfaq Kayani, the powerful army chief who had long denied that Mr bin Laden was hidden in Pakistan. On April 23rd he had brushed away American grumbles that too little was being done to fight terrorists, saying blithely they would soon be beaten and “we in Pakistan's army are fully aware of the internal and external threat to our country”. All the more galling for him, he said these words at Abbottabad’s military academy, within waving distance of the al-Qaeda leader’s safe-house.

The general may take some more knocks. Several foreign allies, such as Britain’s prime minister, David Cameron, speaking on May 3rd, have called for support to Pakistan’s civilian leaders to continue, while saying that its military chiefs must answer tough questions about their spies. Yet any Western pressure will be calibrated with the civil war next door in Afghanistan in mind.

It is unclear how much will change there after the beheading of al-Qaeda. Optimists see glimmers, if for example the Americans at last push Pakistan to start a long-postponed campaign against the Haqqani network, which attacks Western forces in east Afghanistan from Pakistani bases. Al-Qaeda itself may be written off as irrelevant in Afghanistan, where intelligence folk say its fighters number fewer than 100. And if the more powerful Taliban accept that Mr bin Laden is dead, it may feel released from a Pashtunwali honour code about protecting guests and so disavow ties with al-Qaeda. A Western demand for them to do so has been the biggest block to planned peace talks. The Taliban may be spurred to act, fearing that whatever support it gets from inside Pakistan is in jeopardy.

But it is not clear that the Taliban will grow any more amenable just yet, and few observers think talks would get far given the many groups that would have to be involved. The Taliban's leaders will watch to see whether Mr bin Laden’s death softens Westerners’ already flagging will to fight on in Afghanistan, and whether plans to get many troops out in the next three years are hardened up—which would in turn weaken Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president. The fallout from Mr bin Laden's death in South Asia is only just beginning.

 

[Hafizzz]

European discomfort grows about bin Laden killing
European discomfort grows about bin Laden killing | Reuters

European happiness with the death of Osama bin Laden was tempered on Wednesday by details showing he was unarmed when shot dead and qualms about whether torture of prisoners helped U.S. forces track him down.

Killing an UNARMED man !!!

 

[President Camacho]

Sir,

The issue is somewhat different----pakistan is being plastered against the wall at this time in the world press, the world media and in the world perception-----there is too much being said against pakistan----and if pakistan doesnot come out swinging now----its credibility is done for awhile----. Evwen if at a later time---it comes out that pak helped carry out the operation or whatever----it won't be of any help----people would already have ideas imbedded in their minds which would be impossible to change---.

Pakistan and pakistanis need to learn something---it is the media and american public that rules the white house---if you have the media and the public with you---the white house will follow suite---otherwise---the white house can only go so far---which is from one election to another.

Second thing is---it is going to give ideas to our neighbour----actually it already has---now pakistan is at a loss of time and strategy----india can strike at any time---a time of their choice ----which puts pakistan in a big quandry----once you are onthe recieving end----you are already a loser---.

Pakistan millitary has bungled one more time----they are proving themselves to be a bigger fools than people thought that they were---time and again they have failed to capture the moment to their advantage and this time they have topped it all of with the worst blunder that they could in the 60 plus years of pak history.

Mastan bhai... its sad to see you (or any Pakistani in this forum) sound so disheartened and hopeless, but I want you (and every Pakistani) to look at things with a positive attitude -

Second thing is---it is going to give ideas to our neighbour----actually it already has---now pakistan is at a loss of time and strategy----india can strike at any time---a time of their choice ----which puts pakistan in a big quandry----once you are onthe recieving end----you are already a loser---.

India is indeed looking at the developments very keenly. Whom would Pakistan concern more than to Indians? But please get rid of the thought that India might attack any time soon (this decade - forget it). India is in no position to attack any country whatsoever, and top of that a nuclear armed Pakistan. Remember how India practiced a lot of brinkmanship after Parliament House incident, but did not attack Pakistan?

India is madly focusing on its economy, because that is the call of the time. It would be utter foolishness to lose this growing power that India is getting because of its swelling economy, by getting into a war with Pakistan, which is still a very crucial partner to the US (India's second biggest trading partner, and strongest card leading to UNSC). Nor does India have the capability to sustain the war and keep the economy moving at the same pace.

So I would say, forget about India, you are overestimating its capabilities.

Pakistan and pakistanis need to learn something---it is the media and american public that rules the white house---if you have the media and the public with you---the white house will follow suite---otherwise---the white house can only go so far---which is from one election to another.

This is the most crucial part that I want Pakistani members to look closely into. It is not just the US or India, or any other democratic country. Even in Pakistan, it is the people power that rules!!! You have just not realized it yet. Here's how:

The power of the Pakistani Army comes from only one source: The unshakable confidence of Pakistani people in the Pakistani Army!

It is because the people never question the intent and modus operandi of the PA, that the PA gets away with all the luxuries it does! Extreme power to the Generals, several corporations in numerous industries, inflated defence budgets and further increases even if it costs people the education they rightfully derserve... and many more.

Once the PA fails the people, they (the people) will lose confidence and question the Army. This questioning will nip the power of the Generals, or at least reduce it. The fear of reduction in the power that the PA commands, will force it to perform at the highest level. It is still, in fact a democracy!

Do not be so disheartened yar, things are not as bad!

If you ask my personal opinion on the incident - The ISI and the PA have done remarkably well in balancing between the sentiments of the Mujaheddin and the US.

 

[Safriz]

^^ nothing ever happens in the sleepy town of abbottabad...while the rest of the country had seen bomb blasts,nothing of this sort ever happened in abbottabad..I am not surprized that the local army boys took time to realize that something different is actually happening in abbottabad.

 

[xTra]

Killing an UNARMED man !!!

Nobody were armed at TWIN TOWER too.

 

[ghazi52]

Could the bin Laden Raid Have Revealed a Secret New Helicopter?


A picture of the tail rotor of the chopper that the Navy Seals' Team Six detonated revealed unfamiliar features. Reports say it could be a new, secret helicopter.
When the Team Six members reached Osama bin Laden's compound in Abbottabad one of the choppers made a "controlled but hard landing," according to reports, probably due to higher than expected temperatures.
Temperatures affects the density of the air, and low density makes it harder for the rotor to sustain the weight of the chopper, especially if it was near its maximum weight (being packed with soldiers and fuel to fly in from Afghanistan). Abbottabad is about 1200 meters above the sea level, and altitude also affects air density. (Inside the Osama bin Laden Strike: How America Got Its Man.)
So what machine exactly experienced the hard landing described above? Short answer: we don't know for sure. Long answer: It seems that the tail rotor visible in the picture belongs to a highly modified version of the H-60, the chopper of choice of the special forces for more than 30 years. Aviation Week doesn't beat around the bush, claiming: "A previously undisclosed, classified stealth helicopter apparently was part of the U.S. task force that killed Osama bin Laden in Pakistan on May 1."
Stealth technology on helicopters is not itself new, but the fact that a previously unknown machine was used in this raid is yet another proof of the degree of importance that this mission had for U.S. commanders. (Watch President Obama's announcement of Osama bin Laden's death.)
Aviation Week then goes techie and explains what we can see from that picture: "Photos disseminated via the European PressPhoto agency and attributed to an anonymous stringer show that the helicopter’s tail features stealth-configured shapes on the boom and the tail rotor hub fairings, swept stabilizers and a 'dishpan' cover over a five-or-six-blade tail rotor. It has a silver-loaded infrared suppression finish similar to that seen on V-22s."
Low radar visibility was essential, for the Pakistani air force would have either scrambled its jets if an unknown threat to its airspace (and near the country's best military academy!) was detected, or fired its surface to air missiles. It's possibly more proof of the fact that Pakistan really knew nothing about the mission - or at least its first wave of attack - until it ended. (See pictures of Osama bin Laden.)
This would explain why the Seals wasted critically precious time to blew up the mysterious helicopter and why many experts had problems identifying its remains. It's unclear what Pakistan could have made of the downed chopper, but growing ties between Pakistani and Chinese armed forces could have made the destruction of such new machine a must. China and Pakistan, over the past two decades, have developed a multi role combat aircraft called JF-17 and an advanced trainer, the JL-8.
The Navy Seals usually fly in the famed Sikorsky UH-60, popularized by the movie Black Hawk Down, in which two UH-60 were shot down in Somalia, resulting in the death of 18 men.
Black Hawk Down was a scenario, insiders say, that together with first attempt to rescue the hostages held at the U.S. embassy in 1980 in Iran, that's been evoked constantly in the planning phases leading to the May 1 raid, as examples of potentially disastrous outcomes.
By MICHELLE TRAVIERSO – Wed May 4

 

[Hafizzz]

Nobody were armed at TWIN TOWER too.

"Nobody" ????

SO security guards have no guns ???

 

[Hafizzz]

Bin Laden dies; Does the cover-up live?
Bin Laden dies; Does the cover-up live? - English pravda.ru

In a previous Pravda.Ru article, Justice in America is a Lie (02/21/11), I explained how attorneys are trained to not only look at the immediate impact of a legal case or historical event, but also at the precedent that case or event might set. As I said, "while some attorneys fight hard to prevent the ascendancy of bad precedents, others actually work to create them, knowing that once a door is slightly ajar it can easily be pushed open the rest of the way."

Because of this training, it has been difficult for me to join in the jubilation that has erupted in the wake of the assassination of Osama bin Laden. This is in no way meant to imply that I am an apologist for bin Laden, and clearly if he committed the acts he was accused of a capital sentence would have been justified, even though, having witnessed firsthand the corruption of America's legal system, I continue to look askance at its use of the death penalty.

But a capital sentence is usually rendered after a trial is conducted and a guilty verdict returned. But the killing of bin Laden means that no such trial will ever be conducted. And this, of course, raises the question: Why?

At the time of this writing, the circumstances surrounding bin Laden's death remain unclear. Initially it was stated that he engaged in a shootout with American "Navy Seals." Later it was reported that he was unarmed. Naturally, not having been in the room when and where bin Laden was killed, it is impossible for me to say whether he was extrajudicially executed or not.

But, given the reports that he was unarmed, the circumstances seem to indicate that he was the target of an extrajudicial execution. And while this has certainly inspired a copious amount of visceral satisfaction, if America's government can be cheered for conducting such an execution, then does this not also establish the precedent that the president of the United States can now extrajudicially execute anyone he/she chooses without ever giving the accused an opportunity to defend themselves in a court of law?

Also, since America is waging a "war on terror," would bin Laden not have been a more valuable asset alive than dead? Now, not only did all the information he possessed die with him, his followers have his "martyrdom" to use as a recruitment tool. While its effect might not be immediate, history has shown that the influence of one's "martyrdom" can actually increase with the passage of time, which means that bin Laden's death might serve as an inspiration to future generations of terrorists.

In addition, the fact that bin Laden was killed instead of captured will only magnify questions about the circumstances surrounding the attacks of September 11, 2001. Many polls have indicated that a considerable number of Americans believe George W. Bush and his cronies were complicit in these attacks, with theories ranging from their planting explosives to destroy the World Trade Center and/or nearby buildings to their intentionally ignoring warnings about the planned attacks, so they could exploit the ensuing outrage to instigate the invasion of Iraq.

The actions of Bush and his fellow warmonger Dick Cheney did little to dispel these theories, and in fact did a significant amount to enhance them. Bush rapidly shifted focus from bin Laden to Saddam Hussein as America's primary "enemy," and Cheney (dishonestly it turned out) endeavored to link Hussein to 9/11.

Now with bin Laden dead, new theories will abound that he was killed less for what he did, and more for what he knew and could expose about the events and people involved in the planning and execution of the 9/11 attacks.

These theories are also enhanced by the fact that America's current president, Barack Obama, has done everything in his power to ensure that the torturers and war criminals of the Bush administration never face justice, even going to the extent, as Wikileaks revealed, of pressuring foreign governments into not bringing torture or war crimes charges against them.

Decades ago, shortly after John F. Kennedy was killed in Dallas, the late civil-rights leader Malcolm X generated considerable controversy by calling the assassination an example of "the chickens coming home to roost." But, like many controversial statements, this one contained some truth.

In the mid-1970s, the Church Committee revealed that the American government had assassinated or attempted to assassinate Patrice Lumumba (Congo), the Diem brothers (Vietnam), Che Guevara (South America), and Fidel Castro (Cuba). In addition, the CIA helped orchestrate the coup that overthrew Salvador Allende, the democratically elected president of Chile, and replaced his government with a brutal and murderous military dictatorship.

The Church Committee also revealed that the FBI had attempted to provoke the "La Cosa Nostra [mafia]" into murdering comedian and civil-rights activist Dick Gregory and the leader of a Chicago street gang into murdering Black Panther leader Fred Hampton.

Yet Americans persist in applauding assassinations when they happen to their "enemies," while abhorring them when they happen to their "friends." But how does one choose which assassination to celebrate and which to mourn when their targets have essentially committed the same crimes? What makes some acts "terrorism" and others "heroism," even when both result in the deaths of thousands? What makes one person subject to prosecution for war crimes, while others commit such crimes with impunity? What makes a tactic "torture" when used by one government, but "interrogation" when used by another? And what is the value of "international law" when its enforcement is arbitrary and duplicitous?

Is it the race, religion or nationality of the victims and/or perpetrators? Is it the fact that some atrocities have received a "seal of approval" from powerful governments or alliances like NATO? Is it because only the losers of wars can become its criminals? Or is it simply the reality that the more powerful the nation, the less accountable it is?

Imagine, if you will, a raid on a home not unlike bin Laden's. The target is a man responsible for the deaths of over one hundred thousand people. Highly trained military personnel seeking vengeance for these deaths are conducting the raid. Their target, though unarmed, is nonetheless killed.

Surely, just as in the case of bin Laden, nobody would dispute that justice had been done.

Or would they? What if the raid occurred on United States soil? What if the raiders were former Iraqi soldiers? And what if the target was George W. Bush?

Now I certainly am not advocating or endorsing such a raid. But given the number of civilians these men killed for dishonest and/or self-serving reasons, is it any wonder that numerous countries throughout the world view the United States government as a proponent of double standards that incessantly believes its leaders are above the law?

But if a hypothetical isn't convincing enough, look at reality. A few weeks ago, member nations of NATO, including the United States, began bombing Libya, ostensibly to prevent that nation's leader, Muammar Gaddafi, from committing atrocities against anti-government rebels. Yet during this same period, the government of Bahrain has engaged in a draconian crackdown on anti-government protesters, and the government of Syria has killed hundreds of people engaged in similar protests.

Yet no NATO. Why? Apparently because the dictators of Bahrain and Syria are NATO friendly tyrants.

So, as I previously stated, I am no apologist for bin Laden. But has anyone ever stopped to realize how many times leaders in democratic nations have used killing and/or the exploitation of death as a political weapon? There is virtually no United States President who has not bloodied his hands in some war or conflict (domestic or international), and during the latter part of the last century the American government's killing of people in foreign nations for dubious reasons became so routine that, with the exception of Vietnam, American citizens now rarely even question why it's being done.

Which means that, in today's world, the more political power one struggles to gain, the more likely he/she is going to have to exploit killing or death to obtain it.

No wonder Jesus chose to bless the meek.

Since I opened this article with an observation about capital punishment, I will close by noting that the current governor of Texas, Rick Perry, who has often exploited death through his hardnosed support of capital punishment, has been aggressively attempting to cover-up the fact that he may have executed an innocent man, even going so far as to replace the leader of a commission assigned to investigate this execution with a political crony.

It should also be noted that several prominent individuals, the most recent being former UN nuclear inspector Mohamed ElBaradei, have suggested that George W. Bush and his cronies should face an international war crimes investigation for the "shame of a needless war" in Iraq.

Of course this will never happen. Which brings me to my final thought-actually a question I cannot answer. Will the myriad of "insulators" the politically or economically powerful use to excuse their double-standards, rationalize their crimes and/or evade justice have any impact on the Ultimate Judge once their time on earth is over?

Hopefully not. Because they deserve the same fate that the New York Daily News recently wished upon bin Laden: to "rot in hell."

 

[Ahmad]

"Nobody" ????

SO security guards have no guns ???

what a logic and reasoning.

 

[The HBS Guy]

http://uk.reuters.com/article/2011/05/04/uk-binladen-europe-idUKTRE7434N720110504

LOL

Seriously sometimes these Euros act so funny. Living in a make-believe world, aren't they?

Worrying about 'human rights' of, the world's most evil murderer, Osama Bin Laden...after themselves centuries of killing, pillaging and raping countries around the world.

Their whole economies are based on the blood of millions of men, women and children around the world. The blood which they themselves spilt with such religious fervor for centuries, not even decades.

Sau Sau Choohe Kha Ke Billi Hajj Ko Chali

 

[DV RULES]

Sir,

Isn't that a truly brilliant post from you----I don't know what land you live in----but here is some food for thought-----OBL's 12 year old daughter saw his father killed----his young bride saw him killed----she stepped in between to protect him----there would be other children that would have seen his dead body being carried away----.

OBL's children are with pak isi----they will tell a story----AGNO----I believe it is time for you to resign-----.

This board and its senior members need to raise their thinking standards----they need to put their thinking caps on----this is a crucial time for the nation and how you think and react---seperates the men from the boys----the women from girls----.

Raise your standard of thinking people---.

Sir,

No offensive but
you are also living in fools paradise exactly people like you are a big shame. I never observed a frightened, courage less, hopeless poster in this forum, why?

First you have to change word KHAN from your forum user name because your posts are not deserved this word, KHANs usually didn't show attitudes like in your posts.
I remember that we had talk in RD thread and i wrote you very suitable word for you, "Chronic fera". I think you remember it.

Now i come on topic,

There is no any official video or online interview from OBL's wife verifying his certain death by US special forces, where there is contradictions in statements of his daughter available in media, we are free to think what happened there when yet there is no prove of his death released by CIA or white house. If his family in ISI custody what is guaranty that words over you believed are true but not fabricated?

US arrested Saddam and punish him openly in front of world to show that what we can (Don’t forget that Saddam was not NO 1 wanted person) but a man who declared by US as enemy of US & kept his name on top of terrorist list so why so quickly they free off their hands from OBL’s body? What the mystery behind it? Why they are not releasing photos & even they could keep them with chemical treatment for sometimes?

Here in Russia in news channels or print media there is big ? over US operation ‘s success.

It means something happened against their parameters in operation! Well, more over there are many contradictions between white house statements & US authorities over Pakistan ‘s role in operation.

Pakistan from one side admitted that Pakistan shared intelligence information with US from 2009 to mid of April 2011, if ISI really was not willing to give OBL to America or like CIA chief’s fear over sharing information over operation then ISI could inform him in mid of April that this place is not safe for him and replace him, but this was not happened or happened, we still in confusion.

BBC on its top levels of speculations over ISI incompetence news allegedly linked to anonymous ISI officials, where ISI is army institute & only ISPR authorized to give official statement. Conspiracies, conspiracies & conspiracies.

Another conspiracy circulating that OBL lived there over 6 years & statement linked to his wife telling that they shifted there some months ago. !?

Moreover question over who killed him, his home servant or US soldiers, still not conform.

Despite all these facts top US officials are seeking for good relations & hoping for continuing strategic ties with Pakistan? Strange.

Top US officials gave nothing type statement which reflected serious concern over PA & ISI ability but only media related questions & concerns and CIA Chief concern over ISI. Why? Did you think over it?

What most strange is silence from ISPR or PA.?????????????????????????????????????????????????

Why we are thinking that it means only incompetence of strategic forces but we also can think that something happened there beyond our understandings or analysis which mostly dependent on media reports?

How it could be possible that a country violating international territorial rules & launch operation but in result we will read only a small statement from attacked country’s Ministry of foreign affairs? Where is ISPR? They should have comment over it but not MOFA.

Just go back little when 2 army soldiers are killed by NATO air strike on PAK-AFGH border and in return what was happened, here 4 US helicopters penetrated deep into Pakistan territory and lunch operation in no fly zone near most important strategic assets and ISPR keeps silence, buddy I am not going to believe over 0 PA reaction not important they were aware or not from these god damn stealth BS of US.

In my point of view only top Pakistan military officials are informed about operation then what was use of stealth helicopter? Or this was also planned to show complete stage drama for other world to show that look we attacked without Pakistan notice.

Ok
Let assume that US did secret operation, keeping in dark Pakistan military using advanced secret stealth technology, they killed OBL and moreover they are pressurizing Pakistan to give answer over presence of OBL. Come to this scenario.

What would be our reaction?

Where you are saying that US this, US that, they will do this, they will do that:

They did, yes we know and allegedly proving this reality,

now question rise how to deter this after pressure or aftershocks ? when everybody blaming Pakistan over OBL’s presence in Pakistan. Pakistan ambassador to US Haqani also blaming own country’s intelligence & military.

You know why? Because there are sitting people like you whose pants get wet if US put some pressure.

You people has not retaliation power in diplomatically and strategically. You even can’t say why & what.

Wake up Mastan Khan, enough disgrace own country. You have to leave this attitude.

Pakistan gave openly statement officially that if world knows where he is then come to share with us and we will launch operation, even in drones attack same statement is repeatedly conveyed to US. So I will not repeat my words, if they came to know where OBL was then what makes them independently launch operation? Do they deny that in past Pakistan carried many successful operations against militants, extremists & terrorists and arrested them where some they handed over to US & remaining kept in custody for further investigation. Wasn’t it game of political credit?

Pakistan arrested Umer Patrik in January from Abottabad responsible for 200 lives (Night club Bomb blast) & surely Pakistan exchanged intelligence information with CIA but CIA or Obama was not interested to catch him by own operation but rushed to take Osama whose location came to know after Patik investigation, why? Where I think US didn’t want to give credit to Pakistan & before Pakistan decided to launch operation in light of Patik investigation CIA with very selfishly in hurry attacked location and killed (allegedly). Only to make numbering before American people & this Pakistan got from sincere intelligence cooperation with US.

So further they have to forget that any real intelligence sharing may possible with Pakistan in case they acted as I am thinking.

Pakistan can balance this world pressure to sue on US in international court or break intelligence relations & cooperation in Afghanistan, because Pakistan ever reacted over provided information’s but not important how many these types of extremists are living in Pakistan but who gave right US launch operation independently? US has no right to ask clarification over OBL where Pakistan also can ask clarification over this illegal military operation.

This operation should be done by Pakistan but I am very strong in saying that US feared in live arrest of OBL by Pakistan authorities & feared about information might leaked from investigation that How US used OBL plotting whole this Afghan war & through which resources he delivered videos to CIA (released by CIA in past) living in Abotabad & contacts proving US hand supporting terrorism in Pakistan so before approach on own operation US quickly terminated his own undercover Muslim agent.


Rise your standard of thinking people---.

 

[xTra]

"Nobody" ????

SO security guards have no guns ???

Sorry you won't get it.

I am out.

Khuda Haffiz.