The Truth Will Out: Bin Laden Was Murdered In Cold Blood
The entire fairy tale told by the Pentagon and White House is rapidly falling apart. As is typical in police killings that are illegal, the assassination of bin Laden wasnt due to him fiercely fighting anyone. He was simply murdered. According to the latest stories, he was UNARMED but refused to hold up his hands. Yup, that required a bullet to the eye and heart.
.
Legal experts are demanding more information while warning Obama, if the reports are true, he is in some trouble: Osama bin Laden: US responds to questions about killings legality | World news | The Guardian
.
The prominent defence lawyer Michael Mansfield QC expressed similar doubts about whether sufficient efforts had been made to capture Bin Laden. The serious risk is that in the absence of an authoritative narrative of events played out in Abbottabad, vengeance will become synonymised with justice, and that revenge will supplant due process.
.
Assuming the mission was intended to detain and not to assassinate, it is therefore imperative that a properly documented and verifiable narrative of exactly what happened is made public. Whatever feelings of elation and relief may dominate the airwaves, he said, they must not be allowed to submerge core questions about the legality of the exercise, nor to permit vengeance or summary execution to become substitutes for justice.
.
.
We now know that some Obama (I almost wrote Bush because the two Presidents are nearly interchangeable at this point!) employees in the White House said that the charge was to kill Bin Laden, not capture him. The assassins were very gung-ho and cheered this Presidential order. Now, everyone is backing off of this obvious true statement. So the story was first floated that bin Laden fought like a fiend and had to be shot. Now, that has been shot down since people all over the planet are demanding to see the video of this shooting. Yes, there most certainly is a video of it! I am absolutely certain of this!
.
Like with all police brutality killings, the long arm of the law always claims the victim resisted violently and thus, there was no alternative (hasnt the Pentagon heard of other methods of securing people?????!!!!!). So, the White House admits that Bin Laden Was Unarmed but Resisted and that Bin Laden Not Armed and Wife Not Killed, she was shot in the leg for being in the way.
.
I saw the bedroom video. Blood all over the foot of the bed. Yup, he was in bed. Unarmed. With his wife. Both were shot, he in the bizarre way of one eye and the heart. Easy to do to someone laying down. Here is the latest story that has nearly as many holes as the previous, total lying, insane and stupid story that no one believed:
.
In the room with Bin Laden, a woman Bin Ladens wife rushed the U.S. assaulter and was shot in the leg but not killed, the brief statement said. Bin Laden was then shot and killed. He was not armed. Under questioning, Mr. Carney said that the White House stood by its claim on Monday that Bin Laden had resisted capture, but said that resistance does not require a firearm. Mr. Carney said that the new narrative was the result of fresh information .
.
We were able to monitor the situation in real time and were able to have regular updates and to ensure that we had real-time visibility into the progress of the operation, Mr. Brennan told reporters on Monday.
.
But on Tuesday, Leon E. Panetta, the director of the Central Intelligence Agency, said in an interview on the Newshour on PBS that once those teams went into the compound, I can tell you there was a time period of almost 20 to 25 minutes where we really didnt know just exactly what was going on, and there were some very tense moments as we were waiting for information.
.
HAHAHA .good lord! HAHAHA. Obama and his gang of criminal murderers were watching the entire thing in REAL TIME and were boasting about it. But now that there are serious questions about a murder, suddenly, they were out of contact with the killers during the murder and are clueless about what went on. I say, the guys who shot bin Laden dead should be put under oath by a coroner. Since Obama disposed of the body, we must assume this was done to hide important information from the coroner.
.
Here is the old 1926 Act for Britain which explains one cannot dispose of a body legally until a coroner first gives a certificate for burial. Every criminal on earth would dearly love a system with no coroners! To be allowed to dispose of bodies any which way is great if you murder someone! This is why all deaths are covered by many laws, rules and regulations. There is no way around this harsh fact.
.
As I originally pointed out, the sudden disposal of the body of bin Laden meant there was a crime committed, there is no other explanation for flying the body first to Afghanistan and then to sea at great expense. These stories are unravelling as they usually do when any pressure is applied. Too many people in the government witness this crime! Keeping them all on the same story line is proving nearly impossible because too many of them blurted out bits and pieces to reporters already.
.
The entire fairy tale told by the Pentagon and White House is rapidly falling apart. As is typical in police killings that are illegal, the assassination of bin Laden wasnt due to him fiercely fighting anyone. He was simply murdered. According to the latest stories, he was UNARMED but refused to hold up his hands. Yup, that required a bullet to the eye and heart.
.
Legal experts are demanding more information while warning Obama, if the reports are true, he is in some trouble: Osama bin Laden: US responds to questions about killings legality | World news | The Guardian
.
The prominent defence lawyer Michael Mansfield QC expressed similar doubts about whether sufficient efforts had been made to capture Bin Laden. The serious risk is that in the absence of an authoritative narrative of events played out in Abbottabad, vengeance will become synonymised with justice, and that revenge will supplant due process.
.
Assuming the mission was intended to detain and not to assassinate, it is therefore imperative that a properly documented and verifiable narrative of exactly what happened is made public. Whatever feelings of elation and relief may dominate the airwaves, he said, they must not be allowed to submerge core questions about the legality of the exercise, nor to permit vengeance or summary execution to become substitutes for justice.
.
.
We now know that some Obama (I almost wrote Bush because the two Presidents are nearly interchangeable at this point!) employees in the White House said that the charge was to kill Bin Laden, not capture him. The assassins were very gung-ho and cheered this Presidential order. Now, everyone is backing off of this obvious true statement. So the story was first floated that bin Laden fought like a fiend and had to be shot. Now, that has been shot down since people all over the planet are demanding to see the video of this shooting. Yes, there most certainly is a video of it! I am absolutely certain of this!
.
Like with all police brutality killings, the long arm of the law always claims the victim resisted violently and thus, there was no alternative (hasnt the Pentagon heard of other methods of securing people?????!!!!!). So, the White House admits that Bin Laden Was Unarmed but Resisted and that Bin Laden Not Armed and Wife Not Killed, she was shot in the leg for being in the way.
.
I saw the bedroom video. Blood all over the foot of the bed. Yup, he was in bed. Unarmed. With his wife. Both were shot, he in the bizarre way of one eye and the heart. Easy to do to someone laying down. Here is the latest story that has nearly as many holes as the previous, total lying, insane and stupid story that no one believed:
.
In the room with Bin Laden, a woman Bin Ladens wife rushed the U.S. assaulter and was shot in the leg but not killed, the brief statement said. Bin Laden was then shot and killed. He was not armed. Under questioning, Mr. Carney said that the White House stood by its claim on Monday that Bin Laden had resisted capture, but said that resistance does not require a firearm. Mr. Carney said that the new narrative was the result of fresh information .
.
We were able to monitor the situation in real time and were able to have regular updates and to ensure that we had real-time visibility into the progress of the operation, Mr. Brennan told reporters on Monday.
.
But on Tuesday, Leon E. Panetta, the director of the Central Intelligence Agency, said in an interview on the Newshour on PBS that once those teams went into the compound, I can tell you there was a time period of almost 20 to 25 minutes where we really didnt know just exactly what was going on, and there were some very tense moments as we were waiting for information.
.
HAHAHA .good lord! HAHAHA. Obama and his gang of criminal murderers were watching the entire thing in REAL TIME and were boasting about it. But now that there are serious questions about a murder, suddenly, they were out of contact with the killers during the murder and are clueless about what went on. I say, the guys who shot bin Laden dead should be put under oath by a coroner. Since Obama disposed of the body, we must assume this was done to hide important information from the coroner.
.
Here is the old 1926 Act for Britain which explains one cannot dispose of a body legally until a coroner first gives a certificate for burial. Every criminal on earth would dearly love a system with no coroners! To be allowed to dispose of bodies any which way is great if you murder someone! This is why all deaths are covered by many laws, rules and regulations. There is no way around this harsh fact.
.
As I originally pointed out, the sudden disposal of the body of bin Laden meant there was a crime committed, there is no other explanation for flying the body first to Afghanistan and then to sea at great expense. These stories are unravelling as they usually do when any pressure is applied. Too many people in the government witness this crime! Keeping them all on the same story line is proving nearly impossible because too many of them blurted out bits and pieces to reporters already.
.
