PAFAce
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 1,637
- Reaction score
- 0
Question 1:
Not provided.
Question 2:
By the way, doc, loved the rest of your post. Agree with it, all except the PsyOps part (what happened there?). Afghanistan did not deserve to suffer through a decade of war so that the Americans could say "don't mess with us" to the world. There's something not right about a country claiming that they will "defend the basic rights of men" and at the same time say "you're either with us or against us". Hypocricy, I believe, is what this is.
Heck I was discussint this with a friend the other day. If you think about it, the Afghan war is essentially a hissy-fit gone badly, badly wrong. Unfortunately, when elephants throw fits, the entire circus comes tumbling down.
Answer:If the TTP is not fit for us, what makes you think it's good enough for the Afghans?
Not provided.
Question 2:
Answer:What makes you think that i have said that?
Just assumed from your claim that maybe you think that an Afghanistan focused TTP would be preferrable to you.Steve you would prefer a Pakistan focused TTP leader and Pakistanis want an Afghanistan focused TTP leader
By the way, doc, loved the rest of your post. Agree with it, all except the PsyOps part (what happened there?). Afghanistan did not deserve to suffer through a decade of war so that the Americans could say "don't mess with us" to the world. There's something not right about a country claiming that they will "defend the basic rights of men" and at the same time say "you're either with us or against us". Hypocricy, I believe, is what this is.
Heck I was discussint this with a friend the other day. If you think about it, the Afghan war is essentially a hissy-fit gone badly, badly wrong. Unfortunately, when elephants throw fits, the entire circus comes tumbling down.