What's new

Open Letter: Choreographing Subversion in Pakistan from British soil.

Tough, if you dont like my answer. Bottom line is, if you work with terrorists organizations like RAW and Mossad, you become traitor to the state. And just like TTP, deserve a bullet.

Nonsense

All the atrocities on Baloch people is done by Pakistan. Otherwise #FreeBalochistan thing should have not prevailed. The Balochis are supressed by Pakistanis and being looted off their property, freedom women and respect by the Pakistani army.
 
.
Did you check the historical record and see what Baluchi leaders were promised in exchange for their allegiance to Pakistan? Did Pakistani leaders keep to those promises? If not, what rights is it proper for Baluchistan to assert for itself today?
the word is baloch, not Balochi
Balochi is language

Nonsense

All the atrocities on Baloch people is done by Pakistan. Otherwise #FreeBalochistan thing should have not prevailed. The Balochis are supressed by Pakistanis and being looted off their property, freedom women and respect by the Pakistani army.
I dont think Pankaj Baloch and Kamlesh Baloch has anything to do with Balochistan

DBPH7SdXoAAbSct.jpg
DBwUZBmXcAAsgAg.jpg
22552538_1357435154368665_803104383802219858_n.jpg
22519661_1357363241042523_7742095783946348491_n.jpg
DKviONKW4AAZVHP.jpg


Pappi Singh Baloch
DKqMwKzWAAAKuIb.jpg


Mia Baloch
22550359_2009051196031893_596678636403953394_o-png-jpg.432645
 
.
You are not answering the questions put to you.

You are answered.

....On March 26, 1948, the Pakistan Army was ordered to move into the Baloch coastal region of Pasni, Jiwani and Turbat. This was the first act of aggression prior to the march on Kalat by a Pakistani military detachment on April 1, 1948. Kalat capitulated on March 27 after the army moved into the coastal region and it was announced in Karachi that the Khan of Kalat has agreed to merge his state with Pakistan. Jinnah accepted this accession under the gun. It should be noted that the Balochistan Assembly had already rejected any suggestion of forfeiting the independence of Balochistan on any pretext. So even the signature of the Khan of Kalat taken under the barrel of the gun, was not viable, because the parliament had rejected the accession and the accession was never mandated by the British Empire either, who had given Balochistan under Kalat independence before India. The sovereign Baloch state after British withdrawal from India lasted only 227 days. During this time Baluchistan had a flag flying in its embassy in Karachi where its ambassador to Pakistan lived.

To say that the Baloch have been ill-treated by all governments and military establishments since their land was illegally and forcefully taken over would be an understatement -

The Nation, December 5th, 2015

From same source:

The US Ambassador to Pakistan in his dispatch home on March 23, 1948 informed that on March 18, “Kharan, Lasbela and Mekran, feudatory states of Kalat” had acceded to Pakistan.


If one man looking after his own personal interest could be count as the "voice of Baluchistan" as a whole, then good luck in working on this argument.

As I said, Baluchistan never had issue, but only when Afghanistan become either occupied by hostile foreign occupiers or went under their influence.

Disturbance in Baluchistan is linked to the situation in Afghanistan. In nutshell, externally instigated phenomena.

Is such a comparison supposed to comfort Baluchis?

Baluches are comfortable. Just wanted to knock some sense by giving Israel as example.


If people are betrayed by their leaders and can find no just redress through law or election then who exactly are the traitors? Is Pakistan a state that belongs to its people or is it merely supposed to be a tool and plaything for its authorities?

Who is betraying who? Those Baluch fuedals who you mentioned in your link were given millions of ruppees by the state throughout history, they lived like kings, so much so they suppressed the common baluches. Those who are making noises against Pakistan while sitting in Europe are not doing this for the sake of common baluchies but because the state has decided that enough is enough and working to dismental them and liberat the common baluches from their feudal clutches.

Nonsense

All the atrocities on Baloch people is done by Pakistan. Otherwise #FreeBalochistan thing should have not prevailed. The Balochis are supressed by Pakistanis and being looted off their property, freedom women and respect by the Pakistani army.

Bullsh|t. Freebaluchistan pravailed? LOL. its been put in dustbin by London authorities after given bambo by state of Pakistan. Pathetic and laughable attempt by RAW.

You should be more concerned by Kashmir, Khalistan, nagaland, seven sisters, naxalite freedom struggle against India.
 
.
by London authorities after given bambo by state of Pakistan

LOL bumboo by Pakistan? bc bass karr.
Pathetic and laughable attempt by RAW.

You should be more concerned by Kashmir, Khalistan, nagaland, seven sisters, naxalite freedom struggle against India.

Killing Baloch people is Pakistan's habit and the banners and poster which you saw is the result of Pakistani suppression of balochistan
 
. .
Good initiative!!! I like this guy!!!
It about time that interior minister of Balochistan instead of writing letters on stupid issues focus on real issues that actually matter.
and it is about time you focus on what you do the best i.e. troll the Indians :)
 
.
Good initiative!!! I like this guy!!!

and it is about time you focus on what you do the best i.e. troll the Indians :)

Thanks.

But I know what I am talking about and would post on anything I want to.
 
.
Why are Indians so obsessed with Balochestan, a land and people they have nothing to do with. Yet still are unable unwilling to bring justice to the events of operation blue star 1984 which lead to the Delhi massacer of Sikhs? Total hypocrisy by the Indian government yet Sikhs in UK US Canada are igniting the Kahlistan cause. Still Indians are obsessing over Balochestan.
 
.
The only thing keeping Pakistan together is their Army. The Baloch, the Sindhis, the Pathans - most of them are more attached to the idea their region than their nation. Not unlike East Pakistan which was more than 50% of Pakistani population.
 
.
Just like UK will not like a bit if Pakistan host the IRA lot, UK on its part is becoming the hotbed of all anti Pakistan entities and individuals. Either British government has lost control of MI6 or they are complacent. Either way, the mess needs to be cleared before a similar sort of incident happen like Alexander litvinenko where Pakistan as state has to act on its own to protect its national security and cause an unnecessary diplomatic rupture in the relations.
Toni Blair's Govt in general and Tories Govts in particular have been taking a negative attitude towards Pakistan since the last sixteen years.Successive Govts,MI 6 and BBC 4/world service all have adopted pro India policies,be it Cricket,Kashmir ,Baluch Province or Fat pig altaf.With thugs like Nawaz Sharif and Zardari plundering Pakistan and depositing the loot in the British Exchequer.British Anti Pakistan Policy will continue in the the British Interest.
Maghrab ki Ghulami pe razamand huwa tu
MUJHAY Gila tujh se hay Maghrab se naheen .....ALLAMA IQBAL (ra)
 
.
writing political banners on side of cabs is not subversion.... in any case uk govt is not complicit in this matter.
 
.
Just like Muslim league demanded Pakistan out of no dispute.
Balochis have right to demand too.

By the way, it's not Kashmir its Jammu and Kashmir, first learn to take the name of the state.
Lol Muslim league demanded that from Britain not from you Hindus...If that is the case then Muslims were rulers before British so we had every right to do anything..according to your poor logic!
 
.
Muslims league demaded Pakistan from the foreign occupiers, the colonial powers of sub continent. You should be thank full they didnt demand whole of sub continent invoking the muslim rule of one thousand years before the arrival of Britishers.

Baluches have already exercise their right by annex with Pakistan back in 1947. Baluchistan is a sovereign territory of Pakistan. There is no question about it.



Very convenient, when did you use the word "Jummu" with Kashmir in your original rants? But, I dont want to go into tangent, Kashmir is a disputed territory as recognize by India under the UN, you silly attempts to link it a soverign land of Pakistan are self defeating.
East pakistan was not a disputed territory right ?
 
.
Balochistan is an integral part of Pakistan. End of thread!

eik.JPG
do.JPG
teen.JPG
 
Last edited:
. .
Back
Top Bottom