Open Letter: Choreographing Subversion in Pakistan from British soil.

[Taimoor Khan]

Just like Muslim league demanded Pakistan out of no dispute.
Balochis have right to demand too.

By the way, it's not Kashmir its Jammu and Kashmir, first learn to take the name of the state.

Muslims league demaded Pakistan from the foreign occupiers, the colonial powers of sub continent. You should be thank full they didnt demand whole of sub continent invoking the muslim rule of one thousand years before the arrival of Britishers.

Baluches have already exercise their right by annex with Pakistan back in 1947. Baluchistan is a sovereign territory of Pakistan. There is no question about it.



Very convenient, when did you use the word "Jummu" with Kashmir in your original rants? But, I dont want to go into tangent, Kashmir is a disputed territory as recognize by India under the UN, you silly attempts to link it a soverign land of Pakistan are self defeating.

 

[ShoutB]

Muslims league demaded Pakistan from the foreign occupiers,

Pakistanis are foreign occupiers in balochistan

Baluches have already exercise their right by annex with Pakistan back in 1947. Baluchistan is a sovereign territory of Pakistan. There is no question about it.

People in Balochistan are not happy and they do not want to live with Punjabis and this is why its irking Pakistan to see FreeBalochistan poster.

Very convenient, when did you use the word "Jummu" with Kashmir in your original rants? But, I dont want to go into tangent, Kashmir is a disputed territory as recognize by India under the UN, you silly attempts to link it a soverign land of Pakistan are self defeating.

Shut up

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Pakistanis are foreign occupiers in balochistan

How? Baluchistan annexed with Pakistan back in 1947. Only occupier are Indians who occupied not only Kashmir but Junagarh and Hyderabad deccan.

People in Balochistan are not happy and they do not want to live with Punjabis and this is why its irking Pakistan to see FreeBalochistan poster.

Some miscreants living in Europe do not classify as the voice of Baluchies. The Baluches as a whole have already expressed their free will to merge and assimilate into Pakistan back in 1947. Case is closed, done and dusted.

Shut up

Touchy!!

 

[The Diplomat]

Just like Muslim league demanded Pakistan out of no dispute.
Balochis have right to demand too.

By the way, it's not Kashmir its Jammu and Kashmir, first learn to take the name of the state.

So does Nagaland and Khalistan. Lets make poster for them maybe?

Pakistanis are foreign occupiers in balochistan

What? Just like India is occupying Punjab that belongs to Khalistan?
And Nagaland, Assam, Tripur and Kashmir?

How? Baluchistan annexed with Pakistan back in 1947. Only occupier are Indians who occupied not only Kashmir but Junagarh and Hyderabad deccan.

Several insurgencies going on in India, he should worry about Khalistan 2020 before Balochistan.

 

[ShoutB]

What? Just like India is occupying Punjab that belongs to Khalistan?
And Nagaland, Assam, Tripur and Kashmir?

they together form north east India
and it was Nagas who butchered Pakistani soldiers during war in Kargil
by the way your Baloch regiment has only Punjabis lol

How? Baluchistan annexed with Pakistan back in 1947. Only occupier are Indians who occupied not only Kashmir but Junagarh and Hyderabad deccan.

Balochis are not happy so that's why such posters are out as they are demanding freedom

insurgencies going on in India, he should worry about Khalistan 2020 before Balochistan.

Yes Khalistan with Lahore as capital under Indian domain

Some miscreants living in Europe do not classify as the voice of Baluchies

Of course every forced Pakistani outside represents its country.

 

[The Diplomat]

Yes Khalistan with Lahore as capital under Indian domain

Acting stupid or just messed up in your head? Khalistan problems are in India not in Pakistan... Tf you talking about?

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Balochis are not happy so that's why such posters are out as they are demanding freedom

You mean some RAW sponsored terrorist? As I said, Baluchistan is a done and dusted issue.

Of course every Pakistani outside represents its country.

Only those who are loyal to Pakistan.

 

[Solomon2]

How? Baluchistan annexed with Pakistan back in 1947.

Did you check the historical record and see what Baluchi leaders were promised in exchange for their allegiance to Pakistan? Did Pakistani leaders keep to those promises? If not, what rights is it proper for Baluchistan to assert for itself today?

 

[ShoutB]

You mean some RAW sponsored terrorist? As I said, Baluchistan is a done and dusted issue.



Only those who are loyal to Pakistan.

I said every Pakistani or forced Pakistani represents Pakistan now you are calling balochis as disloyal
wow
just because they don't want the tag of Pakistan they become disloyal
this is the problem

Acting stupid or just messed up in your head? Khalistan problems are in India not in Pakistan... Tf you talking about?

but without nankana sahib Khalistan is empty and useless. so they need to take Lahore aswell

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Did you check the historical record and see what Baluchi leaders were promised in exchange for their allegiance to Pakistan? Did Pakistani leaders keep to those promises? If not, what rights is it proper for Baluchistan to assert for itself today?

They are given full right and representation in the power corridors of Pakistan, according to their population.

It is a non issue. Only raise by the hostile foreign powers. It only pop up when Afghanistan is under the occupation and influence of these hostile foreign powers.

If Israel can be carved out of a totally occupied lands and accepted by west, Pakistan merged Baluchistan by the free will of the Baluches with the protocols agreed back in 1947 with British colonials.

I said every Pakistani or forced Pakistani represents Pakistan now you are calling balochis as disloyal
wow
just because they don't want the tag of Pakistan they become disloyal
this is the problem

I am only calling those traitors who are not loyal to Pakistan and working with the terrorist outfits like RAW and Mossad.

 

[ShoutB]

I am only calling those traitors who are not loyal to Pakistan and working with the terrorist outfits like RAW and Mossad.

so any one who is Not happy being called as Pakistan due to oppression by Pak army is traitor according to you.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

so any one who is Not happy being called as Pakistan due to oppression by Pak army is traitor according to you.

Where does Pakistan army come into this.

Whoever is working with the terrorist organizations of RAW and Mossad against the "state" of Pakistan is a traitor and doesn't count.

 

[ShoutB]

Where does Pakistan army come into this.

Whoever is working with the terrorist organizations of RAW and Mossad against the "state" of Pakistan is a traitor and doesn't count.

That's an excuse to cover your atrocities and blame it on others.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

That's an excuse to cover your atrocities and blame it on others.

Tough, if you dont like my answer. Bottom line is, if you work with terrorists organizations like RAW and Mossad, you become traitor to the state. And just like TTP, deserve a bullet.

 

[Solomon2]

They are given full right and representation in the power corridors of Pakistan, according to their population.

You are not answering the questions put to you.

It is a non issue. Only raise by the hostile foreign powers. It only pop up when Afghanistan is under the occupation and influence of these hostile foreign powers.

....On March 26, 1948, the Pakistan Army was ordered to move into the Baloch coastal region of Pasni, Jiwani and Turbat. This was the first act of aggression prior to the march on Kalat by a Pakistani military detachment on April 1, 1948. Kalat capitulated on March 27 after the army moved into the coastal region and it was announced in Karachi that the Khan of Kalat has agreed to merge his state with Pakistan. Jinnah accepted this accession under the gun. It should be noted that the Balochistan Assembly had already rejected any suggestion of forfeiting the independence of Balochistan on any pretext. So even the signature of the Khan of Kalat taken under the barrel of the gun, was not viable, because the parliament had rejected the accession and the accession was never mandated by the British Empire either, who had given Balochistan under Kalat independence before India. The sovereign Baloch state after British withdrawal from India lasted only 227 days. During this time Baluchistan had a flag flying in its embassy in Karachi where its ambassador to Pakistan lived.

To say that the Baloch have been ill-treated by all governments and military establishments since their land was illegally and forcefully taken over would be an understatement -

The Nation, December 5th, 2015

If Israel -

Is such a comparison supposed to comfort Baluchis?

I am only calling those traitors who are not loyal to Pakistan and working with the terrorist outfits like RAW and Mossad.

If people are betrayed by their leaders and can find no just redress through law or election then who exactly are the traitors? Is Pakistan a state that belongs to its people or is it merely supposed to be a tool and plaything for its authorities?