What's new

Only Indian troops withdrawing, Chinese troops continue to patrol area

And you withdrew? :rofl:. Come on hero, stay on and fight.:rofl:


Chinese left, we are still there as per our official stand.:rofl:. The same case like your media claim India kicked *** in Ladakh right?:rofl:
Little sissy chinese mighty dance moves.
Crying like babies after getting injured.lol
 
.
We informed you and it is only 100 meters from the border genius? :rofl:.

SYGwA97.gif

Did we agree on that? I didn't hear a squel from MEA about his. They were painting it as if it was mutual withdrawal last I head
Of course pla doggos are withdrawing, otherwise they wouldn't need to cry out so loud about reserving their 'right to patrol' so much like little girls!!Why would they need to patrol that area if they could maintain a permanent present??Stupid prc chicom troll. :lol:
Sure stay on your side,
We will do what we please, chicom wanker. :lol:
you trespass again, someone is getting shot,
And you shot one of us and someone on your side will be gutted or impaled on stake, piggy style, you know, either across the center line from throat to the balls or driving a rod from the shithole all the way out of the pie hole!!Whichever you prefer. :rofl:
no more *** kicking like in Ladakh.
You mean backstabbing like sissies?? :lol:
Latest statement by China is there are strengthening border defences after this incident. Most likely fencing works.
Sure thing my chicom pal, we will raze those to the ground and shove tie them to your pla necks just like this time. :lol:
 
Last edited:
. . . . .
View attachment 421516

Of course pla doggos are withdrawing, otherwise they wouldn't need to cry out so loud about reserving their 'right to patrol' so much like little girls!!Why would they need to patrol that area if they could maintain a permanent present??Stupid prc chicom troll. :lol:

We will do what we please, chicom wanker. :lol:

And you shot one of us and someone on your side will be gutted or impaled on stake, piggy style, you know, either neck to balls or from posterior to pie hole!!Whichever you prefer. :rofl:

You mean backstabbing like sissies?? :lol:

Sure thing my chicom pal, we will raze those to the ground and shove tie them to your pla necks just like this time. :lol:

1) Apparently you did not know we informed India out of goodwill prior to building the road...and since when did India patrol Doklam genius.:rofl:

2) So how do you patrol and yet withdraw? The half completed road is still there, that's not permanent? How many meters did you destroy?:rofl:. You maintain a presence by patrolling genius, so we should stay still and not move? :rofl:

3) Gutted like in 1962? :rofl:
 
. .
:lol: We will be delight to have contact with Bhutan army...there is no better opportunity than this, for long time India has done everything to prevent Bhutan of having direct contact, everything has to pass though India... but with Donglang affaire, not only Indian army leave this area but give PLA opportunity to cozy with our Bhutanese friends :lol:.

Not sure why you were not able to cozy up with your Bhutanese friends earlier as you guys were patrolling the area even before the stand off too and the issue now is ur road construction not patrolling :lol:
 
.
From behind when our policeman wasn't watching if I might add.Can't say anything about chicomistan but in the outside world, that's sissy incarnated!! :lol:
It was from the front, and that guy tried to turn his back and run, hence he got kung powed.:rofl: Flying Indian man, classic, this shall be THE PICTURE. We literally kicked ***
 
.
1) Apparently you did not know we informed India out of goodwill prior to building the road...and since when did India patrol Doklam genius.:rofl:

2) So how do you patrol and yet withdraw? The half completed road is still there, that's not permanent? How many meters did you destroy?:rofl:. You maintain a presence by patrolling genius, so we should stay still and not move? :rofl:

3) Gutted like in 1962? :rofl:
You are not a chinese this is way below for an average Chinese. Please change your flag.
 
. .
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...t-from-face-off-site/articleshow/60262735.cms

Doklam row: China removes road-building equipment from face-off site

HIGHLIGHTS



    • MEA on Monday said that “expeditious disengagement of border personnel at the face-off site at Doklam was on-going.”
    • In a second statement at the end of the day, MEA confirmed that both sides had moved out “under verification.”
NEW DELHI: In a diplomatic victory, India and China have agreed to "disengage" from the stand-off in Doklam on Bhutanese territory.

After almost 10 weeks of sustained negotiations between top-level Indian and Chinese officials, the MEA on Monday said "expeditious disengagement of border personnel at the face-off site at Doklam has been agreed to and is on-going."

By the end of the day, as Indian troops withdrew from their post at Doka La, Chinese troops and their road-building equipment too were removed from the face-off site. The standoff has been on since June 16 when Indian troops physically stopped the PLA from building a road on Doklam plateau. In a second statement at the end of the day, MEA confirmed that both sides had moved out "under verification."

The negotiations were conducted at various levels — first, during the visit by NSA Ajit Doval to China in July, where he held discussions with his counterpart Yang Jiechi. Next, foreign secretary S Jaishankar led the diplomatic talks with the Chinese side, helped by India's ambassador to China Vijay Gokhale, who worked ceaselessly with the Chinese government over the last couple of months to achieve an outcome that would be acceptable to both sides.

The MEA spokesperson said that in numerous meetings between the Indian and Chinese officials in the past couple of months, India has been successful in conveying its "concerns and interests." "In recent weeks, India and China have maintained diplomatic communication in respect of the incident at Doklam. During these communications, we were able to express our views and convey our concerns and interests."

The disengagement comes ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to China for the BRICS summit. It also comes before a crucial 19th party congress in China where Xi Jinping expects to be "cleared" for another five years and he will choose the core group of leaders who will rule China for the next five years.

The Indians went in with some demands:




    • That China should not change the ground realities unilaterally.
    • That China should respect the the 2012 understanding on tri-junctions.

This was detailed by external affairs minister Sushma Swaraj in parliament where she said, "Point 13 of the common understanding states that "The tri-junction boundary points between India, China and third countries will be finalised in consultation with the concerned countries." Since 2012, we have not held any discussion on the tri-junction with Bhutan. The Chinese action in the Doklam area is therefore of concern."

While China was breathing fire in the public domain, during the negotiations, sources said, India held the line that bilateral relations would be affected if China did not ensure "peace and tranquillity" on the border. This could happen only if there was a reversal to the status quo. The two sides only came to an understanding after continued conversations and a realisation in China that India would not move from the ground until they withdrew.

In addition, India also provided China with a face-saving exit. China's initial response on Monday morning was to confine itself to saying that only Indian troops had withdrawn from the site, and that they would continue to "maintain sovereignty"on the Doklam plateau. India did not contest this publicly until in the afternoon, when a second Indian statement clarified that both sides had withdrawn "under verification."


 
. .
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...t-from-face-off-site/articleshow/60262735.cms

Doklam row: China removes road-building equipment from face-off site

HIGHLIGHTS



    • MEA on Monday said that “expeditious disengagement of border personnel at the face-off site at Doklam was on-going.”
    • In a second statement at the end of the day, MEA confirmed that both sides had moved out “under verification.”
NEW DELHI: In a diplomatic victory, India and China have agreed to "disengage" from the stand-off in Doklam on Bhutanese territory.

After almost 10 weeks of sustained negotiations between top-level Indian and Chinese officials, the MEA on Monday said "expeditious disengagement of border personnel at the face-off site at Doklam has been agreed to and is on-going."

By the end of the day, as Indian troops withdrew from their post at Doka La, Chinese troops and their road-building equipment too were removed from the face-off site. The standoff has been on since June 16 when Indian troops physically stopped the PLA from building a road on Doklam plateau. In a second statement at the end of the day, MEA confirmed that both sides had moved out "under verification."

The negotiations were conducted at various levels — first, during the visit by NSA Ajit Doval to China in July, where he held discussions with his counterpart Yang Jiechi. Next, foreign secretary S Jaishankar led the diplomatic talks with the Chinese side, helped by India's ambassador to China Vijay Gokhale, who worked ceaselessly with the Chinese government over the last couple of months to achieve an outcome that would be acceptable to both sides.

The MEA spokesperson said that in numerous meetings between the Indian and Chinese officials in the past couple of months, India has been successful in conveying its "concerns and interests." "In recent weeks, India and China have maintained diplomatic communication in respect of the incident at Doklam. During these communications, we were able to express our views and convey our concerns and interests."

The disengagement comes ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to China for the BRICS summit. It also comes before a crucial 19th party congress in China where Xi Jinping expects to be "cleared" for another five years and he will choose the core group of leaders who will rule China for the next five years.

The Indians went in with some demands:




    • That China should not change the ground realities unilaterally.
    • That China should respect the the 2012 understanding on tri-junctions.

This was detailed by external affairs minister Sushma Swaraj in parliament where she said, "Point 13 of the common understanding states that "The tri-junction boundary points between India, China and third countries will be finalised in consultation with the concerned countries." Since 2012, we have not held any discussion on the tri-junction with Bhutan. The Chinese action in the Doklam area is therefore of concern."

While China was breathing fire in the public domain, during the negotiations, sources said, India held the line that bilateral relations would be affected if China did not ensure "peace and tranquillity" on the border. This could happen only if there was a reversal to the status quo. The two sides only came to an understanding after continued conversations and a realisation in China that India would not move from the ground until they withdrew.

In addition, India also provided China with a face-saving exit. China's initial response on Monday morning was to confine itself to saying that only Indian troops had withdrawn from the site, and that they would continue to "maintain sovereignty"on the Doklam plateau. India did not contest this publicly until in the afternoon, when a second Indian statement clarified that both sides had withdrawn "under verification."


More rumors. :lol:

From the OFFICIAL statements from both China and India, we can see that India has unilaterally withdrawn all their troops, Chinese soldiers continue to patrol the area, and there has been no statement at all about any roads.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom