Only 5% of people are creating trouble in valley: Mehbooba

[Surya 1]

why should those figure match when the extremist are ruling your country and are using government machinery for this purpose. 2000 muslims killed in gujrat. you are right figures don't match.
secondly we have rejected extremism. you have elected extremism.

Exhilarating others fault is in the blood of you people. It was some 700 Muslims and 300 hindus had died. Had Ahemadia, christian or Hindus would have burnt 60 Sunnis alive in train in pakistan, not even a single fellow of that community would have remained alive. We know that figure of 3 million Bengali, 25000 Palestinees. 50000 baluchs and countless sindhis etc Why are you crying for just 700 Muslims? This is the lowest figures of Muslims killed in any part of the world.

most of these websites are owned by christian religious mercenaries whose rivals are muslims. these websites are known for spreading false informations just to bring people into their religion.
islam is not spreading at the fastest rate in australia according to their statistics and that is the breaking news for you.
but overall in the world islam is the fastest growing religion.
and about secret christians. i myself read a book stating that hindus secretly are muslims. so i think we should not believe in these secret religion theories. 350 million is a large number. if it were true most of my relatives and friends would have been secret christians. its just christian muslim competition in converting people.

Zihad watch is also a christian website?

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

Exhilarating others fault is in the blood of you people. It was some 700 Muslims and 300 hindus had died. Had Ahemadia, christian or Hindus would have burnt 60 Sunnis alive in train in pakistan, not even a single fellow of that community would have remained alive. We know that figure of 3 million Bengali, 25000 Palestinees. 50000 baluchs and countless sindhis etc Why are you crying for just 700 Muslims? This is the lowest figures of Muslims killed in any part of the world.



Zihad watch is also a christian website?

the figures given doesnot relate to extrmism. 3 million bengalis was always a lie. bengalis killed more biharis than number of bengalis killed,25000 palestinese are mostly killed by your friend israel and its allies. 50000 balochis have never been killed even in the last 200 years combine. only some people from 3 tribes out of 150+ tribes were fighting and they were killed mostly. should i give you same figures too then the list will be too long for a country which is facing insurgency on every part of its land.
those 700(which is 2000 in actual) were killed only for 1 reason that is their belief. about muslims burnt story. more than 70 pakistanis were burnt by hindu extremists part of your very army in samjota express terrorism and we had not killed indians for them so stop predicting things.
what ever you say the killer of those 700 muslims is your prime minister. you can't prove him innocent just by counting total number of deaths in pakistan. if some one in pakistan kill a single hindu he is treated as a terrorist not made prime minister unlike india.

 

[X-2.]

our violence and killing figure of one year do not match your violence figure of one day. So better you worry about your country. You should not advice others when you yourself is a big failure.



All are not weak who will bow down to pressure and fear.

HS hahaahaaa kiddo then u unaware of history
Hindus even use to provide there women and money ,there lands to safeguard there life's ,mugals baber etc all used to bandis u know
I will give u good example
There were no army sent to Indonesia or Malaysia but son yet again they have largest Muslims population countries
Even in before mugals India there were !Muslims traders who converted Hindus to Islam by providing them logics that there is better believe other then worshipping idols ,cow mata,or sun etc as gods

 

[ThaniOruvan]

To all day-dreamers,
Referendum is not going to happen at all. Wake up.

With India's economic and diplomatic clout growing every year it is extremely rare that an anti-Indian international alliance is going to enforce this. Do not forget that except China all major countries are pro-India and also make a note that India has very few enemies compared to China. Thus, China cannot take on India anytime in next 10 years at least. After that India will become much more powerful than today forcing armed conflict out of the equation completely (China does not have the balls to attack India today, will it after a decade ? A strict no.). 10 years down the line we do not know that a country named Pakistan will exist or not.

Having said all these, there are only three possible outcomes.

1. India kicks Pakistan out of Kashmir resulting in a civil war inside Pakistan due to huge economic and morale loss leading to the freedom of Balochistan. Pakistan ends up losing 50% of territory under its control today, heavily dependent on India to do direct trade with China (CPEC scrapped as a war fallout) and Central Asia with Afghanistan and Iran becoming close to India day after day. Most painful of them all is water scarcity and famine. India will scrap IWT starving Pakistan of its basic need. India can styill scrap IWT today but owing to its commitment for a peaceful neighbourhood she is still respecting IWT despite Pakistan's backstabbing attempts (just attempts because Pakistan has not accomplished anything solid against India yet).

2. Pakistan peacefully vacating occupied Kashmir with an agreement that CPEC can prevail similar to a decades old Indus Water Treaty.

3. Status-quo. Get hold of whatever each of our countries have today and move on. (This is highly unlikely as India grows in power we will demand back our territory)

 

[Surya 1]

Hindus even use to provide there women and money ,there lands to safeguard there life's ,mugals baber etc all used to bandis u know

Yes, and they converted to Islam by providing their women.

 

[X-2.]

Yes, and they converted to Islam by providing their women.

If Muslims Had forced them they could have,they ruled for hundreds of years but they not,
Get over from this misconception

 

[Surya 1]

If Muslims Had forced them they could have,they ruled for hundreds of years but they not,
Get over from this misconception

They tried but they did not have sufficient daring to do that. They knew very well the result of playing with Hindu sentiments. Aurangzed tried to do that and mughal empire ended.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

If i

If isalm speak by force then whole subcontinent wud hv all muslims not a single other faith

You are underestimating the faith of people who believe in other God/s.

 

[X-2.]

They tried but they did not have sufficient daring to do that. They knew very well the result of playing with Hindu sentiments. Aurangzed tried to do that and mughal empire ended.

Haha,lol Aurangzeb was the most cool guy u had on ur heads lol
He was anti war and peace loving person
If he wud hv been strick then they cud have ruled for more years

 

[X-2.]

You are underestimating the faith of people who believe in other God/s.

No... respecting other faiths is part of my faith,i am just saying Islam isn't spread by force.even u can see Islam in West ,USA or in western asians countries like Indonesia or Malaysia

 

[SarthakGanguly]

i am just saying Islam isn't spread by force.even u can see Islam in West ,USA or in western asians countries like Indonesia or Malaysia

Yes. They would have remained limited to a small population alone (West etc) if no force/coercion/etc was not used.

 

[ThaniOruvan]

No... respecting other faiths is part of my faith,i am just saying Islam isn't spread by force.even u can see Islam in West ,USA or in western asians countries like Indonesia or Malaysia

Islam was forced upon Iran (Persia), india/pakistan/bangladesh (Hindustan). Even today all muslims in western countries are the ones who migrated. Those countries do not have an ethnic muslim population. So Islam is not a religion of peace. If islam is a religion of peace as you claim how come there is terrorism in Syria, Iraq, Libya, turkey, Yemen etc ? To hell with Sunni supremacy....

 

[X-2.]

Islam was forced upon Iran (Persia), india/pakistan/bangladesh (Hindustan). Even today all muslims in western countries are the ones who migrated. Those countries do not have an ethnic muslim population. So Islam is not a religion of peace. If islam is a religion of peace as you claim how come there is terrorism in Syria, Iraq, Libya, turkey, Yemen etc ? To hell with Sunni supremacy....

Lol u are just brainwashed,who invaded these lands and kill there families,iraq Syria Yemen all infection dew to USA or nato,libya as wl...just to hold oil gold and all stuff nothing else...how many Muslims are killed in these wars
Read chilkot report
Eve Tony Blair said it was our fault to start war in Iraq
Google it son
Before there was big powers who use to fight like persia ,bezenteen empire etc ... if it was religious war then who started .. they started read the history son
India was ruled under Muslims for hundreds of years and still in this region there are more Hindus just because they were not forced to convert to slam
There are Muslims in Indonesia and Malaysia as wl as in African nations no Muslim Nation went for war there
Wakeup stop living in lies

 

[ThaniOruvan]

Lol u are just brainwashed,who invaded these lands and kill there families,iraq Syria Yemen all infection dew to USA or nato,libya as wl...just to hold oil gold and all stuff nothing else...how many Muslims are killed in these wars
Read chilkot report
Eve Tony Blair said it was our fault to start war in Iraq
Google it son
Before there was big powers who use to fight like persia ,bezenteen empire etc ... if it was religious war then who started .. they started read the history son
India was ruled under Muslims for hundreds of years and still in this region there are more Hindus just because they were not forced to convert to slam
There are Muslims in Indonesia and Malaysia as wl as in African nations no Muslim Nation went for war there
Wakeup stop living in lies

Your reply is pure BS.
Persia was oppressed by arabs. Native Persians were levied Jizya by the evil arabs to force them into conversion.
Sub-continent wouldn't have a single muslim if not for the forced conversions by the evil Islam rulers. It was Hindus' strong will and belief that thwarted islam rulers' nefarious designs.
Who doesn't know history ?

 

[X-2.]

Your reply is pure BS.
Persia was oppressed by arabs. Native Persians were levied Jizya by the evil arabs to force them into conversion.
Sub-continent wouldn't have a single muslim if not for the forced conversions by the evil Islam rulers. It was Hindus' strong will and belief that thwarted islam rulers' nefarious designs.
Who doesn't know history ? Run to your mama child...learn real history. Intellectuals from Pakistan should never talk of history. Because you really don't have one.

@waz @WAJsal look the language