What's new

Okay, you win!

Joined
Jun 22, 2009
Messages
2,387
Reaction score
0
Here's a question to our Indian friends:

Say China agrees to let India keep the land - and - "Aksai Chin". Will Indians stop there? Or will they encroach on further land? :what:
 
.
That will be nice.
That's about it i guess for India.
Is china contemplating of this?
 
.
Whos china to give us aksai chin or what ever they call it??.....arunachal was india,is india,will remain india......and china is the aggressor here!.....your query is misleading
 
.
Whos china to give us aksai chin or what ever they call it??.....arunachal was india,is india,will remain india......and china is the aggressor here!.....your query is misleading
Dude Aski chin is the part of kashmir that China occupies not Arunachal Pradesh.
Arunachal Pardesh is South tibet for them
 
.
Here's a question to our Indian friends:

Say China agrees to let India keep the land - and - "Aksai Chin". Will Indians stop there? Or will they encroach on further land? :what:

Please answer the question plainly. Will that be enough, or in the future more encroachment will be 'deemed' necessary (for whatever excuse)?
 
.
Whos china to give us aksai chin or what ever they call it??.....arunachal was india,is india,will remain india......and china is the aggressor here!.....your query is misleading

You are right. China is not going to give you anything. We will cut you in half and let you get a taste of what you did to Pak in 1971. I personally prefer to start with Sikkim.
:agree:
 
.
Dude Aski chin is the part of kashmir that China occupies not Arunachal Pradesh.
Arunachal Pardesh is South tibet for them

hmmm...thnx....got confused there....anyways the thread starter actually meant all the land that china claims
 
.
You are right. China is not going to give you anything. We will cut you in half and let you get a taste of what you did to Pak in 1971. I personally prefer to start with Sikkim.
:agree:

there we have the first official flame bait in this stupid misleading idiotic theread!
 
.
there we have the first official flame bait in this stupid misleading idiotic theread!

It's not a flame. It's real. This is your last chance to release Arunachal, after which point we would not find a moral ground to cut you in half. But if you miss this opportunity and don't... :disagree:
 
. .
It's not a flame. It's real. This is your last chance to release Arunachal, after which point we would not find a moral ground to cut you in half. But if you miss this opportunity and don't... :disagree:

hmm,so how do you plan to do it?....your attitude shows whos the aggressor here,who wants to annex other country,and proves how misleading this thread is....,the query should have been otherwise.....arunachal is ours for over 60 yrs,did we go any furthur?.....but look at you
 
.
hmm,so how do you plan to do it?....your attitude shows whos the aggressor here,who wants to annex other country,and proves how misleading this thread is....,the query should have been otherwise.....arunachal is ours for over 60 yrs,did we go any furthur?.....but look at you

Time will not drag Arunachal into Indian map. Arunachal is never yours, at best its disputed areas. You will lose much more if you don't. Time is not really in your favor. :disagree:
 
.
Time will not drag Arunachal into Indian map. Arunachal is never yours, at best its disputed areas. You will lose much more if you don't. Time is not really in your favor.

Arunachal is Indian territory. What is disputed is the Chinese occupation of Tibet.

To answer the OT, If China gives us Aksai China and recognizes the McMahon line then we would have no problems.
 
.
Arunachal is Indian territory. What is disputed is the Chinese occupation of Tibet.

To answer the OT, If China gives us Aksai China and recognizes the McMahon line then we would have no problems.

See your funny logic: China controls Tibet is an occupation, India controls Tibet (South Tibet) is not an occupation.

This is precisely Nehru and his politicians’ villainous mentality: whatever British imperialists took is now mine! They equaled India to bloody imperial British and wanted to be a regional desperado. Boo…. :tdown:

Unfortunately, due to thorough brainwash administrated by GoI over the past several decades, mass ordinary Indians, with high percentage of illiteracy and prone to propaganda, believe the same clownish logic.

Fortunately, India is not once powerful British. It seems in nurturing a wicked desire of raping its neighbors (as reflected by handful Indians gleeful over the rape of Nanjing by Japanese) but it simply doesn’t possess the potency. :lol:

Should the thugs dare to stir up troubles in the neighborhood, all countries: China, Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lank, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Burma should unite and defeat the aggressor, and perhaps divide current India into several pieces for the sake of the eternal peace and prosperity of SA. :sniper:
 
.
Here's a question to our Indian friends:

Say China agrees to let India keep the land - and - "Aksai Chin". Will Indians stop there? Or will they encroach on further land? :what:

If you feed a wolf a lamb, will the wolf need no lamb any more?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom