A country with no foreign troops and former victim of imperialism is accused of being expansionist, while a country who have bases around the world, annex Hawaii, fought war with the Mexican for California and southwest, enslave groups of people, kill of the Native, kick people out of an island to make way for Diego Garcia base, divide country and set up military base - some how that country is not expansionist and we can't question.
What kind of **** are you Indian smoking? How does it feel when you see the British queen wear the Koh-i-Noor diamond the British stole from you?
It is surprising how Indian hate Chinese for a short border war that was cause by the British drawing an arbitry line and how Indian love sucking up to their British master; despite being their slaves for centuries. Indian should target their anger at the British, for stealing all their wealth and making them slaves, and the Indian billionaires who lives in London colluding with the British to milk aways as much from Indian as possible.
China didn't cause Indian poverty. China didn't divide South Asia. Actually, I don't even know what China did to India to receive hatred from India. Whatever China did is miniscue compared to the British and the West?
