What's new

Obama, Modi work to deepen improving US-India ties

ResurgentIran

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 11, 2013
Messages
3,813
Reaction score
-4
Obama, Modi work to deepen improving U.S.-India ties

(Reuters) - U.S. President Barack Obama and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi agreed on Tuesday to deepen U.S.-Indian cooperation on maritime security to ensure freedom of navigation in what amounts to a response to China's naval muscle-flexing in Asia.

The agreement emerged from two days of talks between Obama and the new Indian prime minister as they worked to revitalize a relationship hurt by a heated diplomatic dispute at the turn of the year and flagging optimism about India as a place to do business before the reform-minded Modi came to power in May.

Obama and Modi, speaking to reporters in the Oval Office, said their discussions ranged from trade to space exploration to climate change to the Islamic State threat in the Middle East.

"We already have the foundation of a strong partnership," said Modi, seated beside Obama. "We now have to revive the momentum and ensure that we get the best out of it for our people and for the world."

Modi received a warm welcome in the United States, even though he was denied a visa in 2005 over rioting in his home state three years earlier that killed more than 1,000 people, mostly Muslims. Modi, a Hindu nationalist, was exonerated by an Indian Supreme Court investigation.

A stronger relationship between the United States and India, the world's two largest democracies, has the potential to provide a counterweight to China, whose maritime moves in the Asia-Pacific have rattled regional nerves.

A joint statement said Obama and Modi agreed "to intensify cooperation in maritime security to ensure freedom of navigation and unimpeded movement of lawful shipping and commercial activity, in accordance with accepted principles of international law."

China's increasing assertiveness over territorial claims in the South China Sea and East China Sea has angered its neighbors. India and China have a long-running land border dispute and India's military has recently been monitoring Chinese activity in the Indian Ocean.

Obama and Modi also agreed to negotiate a 10-year extension of a military cooperation framework due to expire at year-end, and will stress counter-terrorism cooperation and joint efforts against militant networks.

However, Indian officials noted that while terrorism was a big shared concern, the joint statement made no reference to any plan for India to joint Obama's coalition against the Islamic State.



NO BIG BREAKTHROUGHS

While the leaders did not announce big-ticket agreements or breakthroughs in resolving significant trade and business irritants, the visit amounted to an official clearing of the air after Modi's visa issue and India's outrage at the arrest in New York last year of one of its diplomats, who was charged with visa fraud and paying her nanny less than the minimum wage.

In a joint "vision statement" on Monday, Obama and Modi vowed to make what the two countries call a "strategic" partnership a model for the rest of the world.

Obama said he was impressed by Modi's interest in addressing poverty and growing India's economy, as well as his determination that India should help bring about peace and security in the world.

"I want to wish him luck in what I'm sure will be a challenging but always interesting tenure as prime minister," Obama said.

In a unique departure from protocol, Obama took Modi on a short motorcade drive from the White House to the memorial honoring slain U.S. civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr.

Modi met congressional leaders and members of the U.S. India business lobby before leaving on Tuesday. After meeting the former, he stressed the importance of addressing environmental issues and cooperation on security. "The humanity of the entire world needs to come together to fight terrorism," he said.

Speaking to the U.S. India Business Council, Modi vowed to continue his war on red tape and urged U.S. business to take advantage of the rapid changes in India.

"My country has come awake," he said. "Please come. And together you will benefit and my country will also benefit."

Rick Rossow of the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank said the effort Modi had made to interact directly with business leaders and the Indian diaspora during his visit would have been a great encouragement, given some doubts in the business lobby about his commitment to reform.

"The numbers are already showing business is interested," Rossow said, referring to increases in foreign direct investment and institutional investment since Modi came to power.

Ashley Tellis, an international security specialist at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, called the Obama-Modi vision statements "wonderfully aspirational," but added:

"Now we’ve got to see whether the policies both sides pursue actually get them to where they want to go. The record thus far does not inspire confidence."

Obama, Modi work to deepen improving U.S.-India ties| Reuters
 
.
Modi's engagement with US will yield substantial commitments
October 01, 2014


First Published: 00:11 IST(1/10/2014)
Last Updated: 00:24 IST(1/10/2014)



While delivering a speech to the United Nations General Assembly is the ostensible reason for Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the United States, it will ultimately be its least important component.


Modi’s engagements with the business community, the Indian-American diaspora, and United States government will yield the most substantial commitments. Looking to Modi’s summit with US President Barack Obama, there is a powerful desire to see game-changing ‘deliverables’ stemming from these meetings.

In particular, at the back of everyone’s mind is whether we will announce another deal of the potential scale and significance of the civilian nuclear cooperation agreement.

The India-US civilian nuclear agreement, announced in July 2005, remains the high-water mark in our shared attempt to strengthen our strategic partnership. And, in two unfortunate ways, it continues to overshadow much of what has followed — including Modi’s summit with Obama.

First, there are expectations that every bilateral summit must have a nuclear deal, or risk being considered a failure. Second, India’s inability to fulfil the promise of civilian nuclear cooperation — through the passage in Parliament of a liability law which has precluded foreign commercial collaboration — has eroded trust in the senior levels of America’s policy establishment that India truly desires a stronger strategic partnership.

Measuring subsequent bilateral leadership summits against the civilian nuclear agreement poses a pair of obvious challenges. First, while there are plenty of deals that could potentially be announced and negotiated, few (if any) will have the impact of the civilian nuclear accord.

Examples of pending deals include the bilateral investment treaty, defence foundation agreements, the Commercial Space Launch Agreement (CSLA), and renewal of our Defense Framework Agreement.

A free trade agreement (FTA) is one potential deal which would match the civilian nuclear cooperation agreement, but there are high hurdles to launching FTA talks with India — in particular, the aforementioned concern among senior American policymakers about India’s ability to follow through on important strategic initiatives, and the fact that the US has its hands full with three major FTA talks already underway.


Second, we start this new phase in our relations with a great deal of accumulated distrust.

Unresolved commercial concerns on both sides of the ocean, to say nothing of the diplomatic incident in New York in December, have cast a dark cloud over the relations, which need to be repaired. And while the election of the new Indian government in May has offered a chance for a fresh start, New Delhi’s decision to block the WTO’s Trade Facilitation Agreement has brought many senior American policymakers to the conclusion that the new government is not such a dramatic change.

Looking back, the signing of the civilian nuclear cooperation agreement could be judged as a bit ahead of its time.

The leaders of both nations saw the significance of the relationship and attempted to lead from the front.

But apart from top leaders, neither side had developed deep relations with their counterparts, so the day-to-day workings of the relations since the July 2005 summit have not been as smooth as we may have hoped.

There is also a concern voiced frequently in Washington policy circles that our relations with India have “become too transactional”.

I actually believe transactional relations are a very positive step, and aligned with how Modi likes to conduct his affairs, as evidenced during his tenure as chief minister of Gujarat.

As noted earlier, we tried to jump-start a deeper strategic partnership by moving directly to cooperation in a deeply strategic sector.

If this “transactional” relation is coloured by the US offering cooperation in areas aligned with Modi’s interest, and the Indian government follows through on resultant commitments, this will provide important confidence-building measures.

A top-down approach to strategic cooperation did not meet either side’s expectations. A stronger bottom-up approach may work better.

There is no doubt that big-picture deliverables are important. They provide critical milestones against which we measure progress, and often challenge policymakers to move into uncharted territory — with resultant risks and rewards.

Deliverables that marry strategic and commercial interests are a potent combination towards boosting powerful, well-rounded relations between our nations.

Cooperation in areas such as civilian nuclear power, space exploration and defence carry particular significance.

But the constant comparisons — whether verbalised or not — to the July 2005 summit are unfair and unhelpful.

As long as the shadow of the nuclear deal dominates our perception of whether a summit is successful, we may continue to feel the relations are under-performing. And this mentality does not do justice to positive, transactional relations.


(Richard M Rossow is Wadhwani Chair in US India Policy Studies, The Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington. The views expressed by the author are personal.)

HT
 
.
In this world, only China and Russia who are able to challenge the unchecked US-NATO.

India is... well, you know.


PS: While Modi in US, US NAVY ships and nuclear submarines are spotted near India.

US nuclear submarine capable to launch a nuclear attack to Mumbai and Delhi.
 
.
In this world, only China and Russia who are able to challenge the unchecked US-NATO.

India is... well, you know.


PS: While Modi in US, US NAVY ships and nuclear submarines are spotted near India.

US nuclear submarine capable to launch a nuclear attack to Mumbai and Delhi.

Really??
Since when did the PRC become that powerful to take on USN.Dude,your SCS is almost encircled by USN CBG and JSDF.PRC is economally good.But you should need at least two decades to realise that might in military field.
India is unique.They ate not like US other allies.India decision is critical for US for their action in Asia.

Obama, Modi work to deepen improving U.S.-India ties

(Reuters) - U.S. President Barack Obama and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi agreed on Tuesday to deepen U.S.-Indian cooperation on maritime security to ensure freedom of navigation in what amounts to a response to China's naval muscle-flexing in Asia.

The agreement emerged from two days of talks between Obama and the new Indian prime minister as they worked to revitalize a relationship hurt by a heated diplomatic dispute at the turn of the year and flagging optimism about India as a place to do business before the reform-minded Modi came to power in May.

Obama and Modi, speaking to reporters in the Oval Office, said their discussions ranged from trade to space exploration to climate change to the Islamic State threat in the Middle East.

"We already have the foundation of a strong partnership," said Modi, seated beside Obama. "We now have to revive the momentum and ensure that we get the best out of it for our people and for the world."

Modi received a warm welcome in the United States, even though he was denied a visa in 2005 over rioting in his home state three years earlier that killed more than 1,000 people, mostly Muslims. Modi, a Hindu nationalist, was exonerated by an Indian Supreme Court investigation.

A stronger relationship between the United States and India, the world's two largest democracies, has the potential to provide a counterweight to China, whose maritime moves in the Asia-Pacific have rattled regional nerves.

A joint statement said Obama and Modi agreed "to intensify cooperation in maritime security to ensure freedom of navigation and unimpeded movement of lawful shipping and commercial activity, in accordance with accepted principles of international law."

China's increasing assertiveness over territorial claims in the South China Sea and East China Sea has angered its neighbors. India and China have a long-running land border dispute and India's military has recently been monitoring Chinese activity in the Indian Ocean.

Obama and Modi also agreed to negotiate a 10-year extension of a military cooperation framework due to expire at year-end, and will stress counter-terrorism cooperation and joint efforts against militant networks.

However, Indian officials noted that while terrorism was a big shared concern, the joint statement made no reference to any plan for India to joint Obama's coalition against the Islamic State.



NO BIG BREAKTHROUGHS

While the leaders did not announce big-ticket agreements or breakthroughs in resolving significant trade and business irritants, the visit amounted to an official clearing of the air after Modi's visa issue and India's outrage at the arrest in New York last year of one of its diplomats, who was charged with visa fraud and paying her nanny less than the minimum wage.

In a joint "vision statement" on Monday, Obama and Modi vowed to make what the two countries call a "strategic" partnership a model for the rest of the world.

Obama said he was impressed by Modi's interest in addressing poverty and growing India's economy, as well as his determination that India should help bring about peace and security in the world.

"I want to wish him luck in what I'm sure will be a challenging but always interesting tenure as prime minister," Obama said.

In a unique departure from protocol, Obama took Modi on a short motorcade drive from the White House to the memorial honoring slain U.S. civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr.

Modi met congressional leaders and members of the U.S. India business lobby before leaving on Tuesday. After meeting the former, he stressed the importance of addressing environmental issues and cooperation on security. "The humanity of the entire world needs to come together to fight terrorism," he said.

Speaking to the U.S. India Business Council, Modi vowed to continue his war on red tape and urged U.S. business to take advantage of the rapid changes in India.

"My country has come awake," he said. "Please come. And together you will benefit and my country will also benefit."

Rick Rossow of the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank said the effort Modi had made to interact directly with business leaders and the Indian diaspora during his visit would have been a great encouragement, given some doubts in the business lobby about his commitment to reform.

"The numbers are already showing business is interested," Rossow said, referring to increases in foreign direct investment and institutional investment since Modi came to power.

Ashley Tellis, an international security specialist at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, called the Obama-Modi vision statements "wonderfully aspirational," but added:

"Now we’ve got to see whether the policies both sides pursue actually get them to where they want to go. The record thus far does not inspire confidence."

Obama, Modi work to deepen improving U.S.-India ties| Reuters

Our sole aim is our national interests and its security.
 
.
Failed already after Chumar spanking made Modi realize a confrontation with China can only end with India as cannon fodder. Modi doesn't trust non-Hindus even Americans.
 
. .
In this world, only China and Russia who are able to challenge the unchecked US-NATO.

India is... well, you know.


PS: While Modi in US, US NAVY ships and nuclear submarines are spotted near India.

US nuclear submarine capable to launch a nuclear attack to Mumbai and Delhi.

who is this girl ? that previous cat was very cute too..

de la yak yak...stop spouting nonsense my frienda ..
 
.
Really??
Since when did the PRC become that powerful to take on USN.Dude,your SCS is almost encircled by USN CBG and JSDF.PRC is economally good.But you should need at least two decades to realise that might in military field.
India is unique.They ate not like US other allies.India decision is critical for US for their action in Asia.

I don't think India military is capable against US.
 
.
I don't think India military is capable against US.

Neither I .
In fact no other nation cant take US for next few decades.A nation having Navy comprising 11 huge CBGs .
 
.
i dont think thats a good idea .

to take side with US agianst your neighbor , but still reuters u know :lol:
 
.
i dont think thats a good idea .

to take side with US agianst your neighbor , but still reuters u know :lol:

You know what these US are doing against Iran in current geopolitical scenario.
But we were the first one who experienced their gun boat diplomacy Iran was in their side ,even these China was in their side during that times specifically 1971.But only USSR came for our help, both from these US and China .

Noone is better my friend neither US nor China.
We always like good relationship with all other nations.Because our nationals interest and security is our priority.
 
.
We always like good relationship with all other nations.Because our nationals interest and security is our priority.
thats a very good attitude brother

Noone is better my friend neither US nor China.
look dear , no one helped iran when we needed them the most .

china and russia both betrayed iran numerous times , and US is our arch nemesis .

but we'll never side with any country against our neighbors , as an example iran wont side with neither pakistani nor india against each other . sth that have been proven over time

i'm just saying that india should be careful with US . they are NOT your friends .

china is making mistakes regarding india , but thats their loss IMO
 
.
thats a very good attitude brother


look dear , no one helped iran when we needed them the most .

china and russia both betrayed iran numerous times , and US is our arch nemesis .

but we'll never side with any country against our neighbors , as an example iran wont side with neither pakistani nor india against each other . sth that have been proven over time

i'm just saying that india should be careful with US . they are NOT your friends .

china is making mistakes regarding india , but thats their loss IMO

When did you need them the most??
 
.
thats a very good attitude brother


look dear , no one helped iran when we needed them the most .

china and russia both betrayed iran numerous times , and US is our arch nemesis .

but we'll never side with any country against our neighbors , as an example iran wont side with neither pakistani nor india against each other . sth that have been proven over time

i'm just saying that india should be careful with US . they are NOT your friends .

china is making mistakes regarding india , but thats their loss IMO

In Geopolitics ,there is no Permanent friends only Permanent interests .China and Russia stands only for their interests.
When Soviet send 10th fleet for our back up in 1971 it was only for their national interest not because of their good hearts.
That was Soviet .Present Russian Federation is cant came nearer to their former when we considering their comparative power.
We always pursued non alignment .But China often resorted in some actions that questioned our integrity.
They can scare SCS nations like Vietnam .And their anger against Japan is their emotional issue.But neither of these will not work against Indian Republic .Because we have our own unique structure .But China cant realise that.It is India's neutral stand that give much leverage for China in Asia .If we choose western camp .Chinese effort will go to vain.(But we dont that because that will affect our interests).

.
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom