Nuclear war between US, Russia would leave 5 billion dead from hunger, study says

[jhungary]

And now they bring in Steven Seagal. Loved his movies, but don't like what's he's doing joining with Russia.

You like Steven Seagal??

Dude, you disappoint me...........lol

 

[Oldman1]

You like Steven Seagal??

Dude, you disappoint me...........

Come on! He was kind of up there with Arnold and Sylvester and Kurt Russell.

One of my favorite was that truck with a gatling gun when they barged into the enemy base!

 

[jhungary]

Come on! He was kind of up there with Arnold and Sylvester and Kurt Russell.

No...........just no...........

I will give you Kurt Russell, but Arnie and Stallone?? Can you imagine Seagal play Terminator? Or Rocky?? I wouldn't even let him play John Kimble in Kindergarten Cop.....

 

[Oldman1]

No...........just no...........

I will give you Kurt Russell, but Arnie and Stallone?? Can you imagine Seagal play Terminator? Or Rocky?? I wouldn't even let him play John Kimble in Kindergarten Cop.....

It really depends on the movie and the audition. Remember Harrison Ford? Indiana Jones. They had a different actor for that movie series but didn't look right. Tom Selleck. Course I wouldn't support Steven in those roles.

 

[jhungary]

It really depends on the movie and the audition. Remember Harrison Ford? Indiana Jones. They had a different actor for that movie series but didn't look right. Tom Selleck. Course I wouldn't support Steven in those roles.

All I can say is if Seagal is in charge of Terminator, there will be a scene or two when a naked playboy bunny jumps out of a Birthday cake....When I pay to see an action movie, I want to see action, not boobies.....

But then I will have to say Strike Back probably mixed the two very well, but not Seagal........

 

[Oldman1]

All I can say is if Seagal is in charge of Terminator, there will be a scene or two when a naked playboy bunny jumps out of a Birthday cake....When I pay to see an action movie, I want to see action, not boobies.....

But then I will have to say Strike Back probably mixed the two very well, but not Seagal........

Why not both? I like that movie Under Siege. Was disappointed when he got killed off in that movie Executive Decision. I was like what??? So Kurt Russell is the only one left.

 

[jhungary]

Why not both? I like that movie Under Siege. Was disappointed when he got killed off in that movie Executive Decision. I was like what??? So Kurt Russell is the only one left.

That's the only reason I watch Under Siege.......

And Kurt Russell belongs to Romcom

 

[AZMwi]

all the Abrahamic religions have prophesied a global war near the end of times that will almost destroy the whole world and will be the deadliest in the history of mankind.

 

[Maula Jatt]

touche

Sheikhupura is also another one, some real a**hole people

@Valar.

https://www.reddit.com/r/pakistan/comments/wwg7wv

 

[casual]

Objectively speaking, I would not say that.

In fact, I think Putin had lost that bet, that's why he doesn't bother with nuclear sabre rattling anymore when their force gets bogged down (Like back in April) and his force is going nowhere now.

The key to the question is whether or not Russia will use nuke on or Ukraine. If you look at the posturing, there are no where Putin can go but actually use nuke in Ukraine had this thing escalated. Yet US and the West still escalating things. First it is NLAW and Javelin, then it's Ex Soviet Artillery and Armoured Vehicle, and now it's advance US and Western Equipment. Essentially, what the West did is the same as March, the only different is they are giving more and more weapon to Ukraine and giving them move advance weapon.

This will drag on the war for Russia, that's definite outcome number 1. Which is what Russia don't want to see, but were there anything Russia can do? Other than attacking NATO supply line and try to get those weapons when they flux into Ukraine, there are pretty much nothing Putin can do. And he is more or less accepted this is going to be the case, and that's why he doesn't bothered with threatening with nuclear weapon anymore.

You can only threaten to destroy this world a couple of time, anything more than that it started to lose its weight, it will gradually become North Korea when the nuclear threat comes daily.

Russia doesn't need nuclear escalation to annihilate Ukraine. So far they have held back on deploying their thermobaric warheads against population centers.

 

[jhungary]

Russia doesn't need nuclear escalation to annihilate Ukraine. So far they have held back on deploying their thermobaric warheads against population centers.

First of all, they did. TOS-1 has been used almost EVERYWHERE in this battlefield, I don't know where you have been in the last 6 months, it has been so widely used, Ukraine even able to capture 3 or 5 system and use it on the Russian themselves.

Second, TOS-1 can't deal much damage than Thermonuclear Warhead. It's damage radius is not far enough to create any sort of a problem, otherwise Russian would already be in Kyiv by now if Thermobaric Warhead is that useful. Because every defence position would have been destroyed by it.

And finally, I don't know how small you think Ukraine is. It's literally impossible to "Annihilate" Ukraine with Thermobaric Weapon alone, if you have maybe 500000 of those system, probably. Ukraine is the size of Texas, it IS the third biggest country in Europe behind Russia and France.

Russia has done everything they can conventionally, any expansion would have to come from either general mobilisation or further thin out Russian border security, Russian-Chinese border is virtually empty of Russian Troop, any draw into the war would most likely have to come in from Russian Southern Border. If you had followed this war, you would know Russia held back nothing, maybe beside the use of their Air Force.

 

[MH.Yang]

We now have 7.8 billion people. I do not believe that after the war in Ukraine, there will be only 2.8 billion people on the earth.

 

[jhungary]

We now have 7.8 billion people. I do not believe that after the war in Ukraine, there will be only 2.8 billion people on the earth.

Well, you can try a little experiment.

Try laying off going to supermarket, going to the tap for water, using phones and internet. And only use a knife or bow (You don't have guns in China) to hunt and try to collect rainwater and make it sanitize enough to drink. And see if you will survive a month.

Because this all will stop when nuclear war hit, you can go underground and seek shelter, but supermarket, water pumping station, water purification plant, farms, food processing factory, all those you cannot bring into your shelter, you can store canned food, but storage is limited. So after the war and when the food source in your shelter runs out (and it WILL runs out) you will need to come out and hunt because all those factory and stuff will not rebuild by magic, which mean you will need to be able to sustain until someone else rebuild the entire system for you, if that someone else existed.

 

[MH.Yang]

Well, you can try a little experiment.

Try laying off going to supermarket, going to the tap for water, using phones and internet. And only use a knife or bow (You don't have guns in China) to hunt and try to collect rainwater and make it sanitize enough to drink. And see if you will survive a month.

Because this all will stop when nuclear war hit, you can go underground and seek shelter, but supermarket, water pumping station, water purification plant, farms, food processing factory, all those you cannot bring into your shelter, you can store canned food, but storage is limited. So after the war and when the food source in your shelter runs out (and it WILL runs out) you will need to come out and hunt because all those factory and stuff will not rebuild by magic, which mean you will need to be able to sustain until someone else rebuild the entire system for you, if that someone else existed.

Why do Hiroshima and Nagasaki always have millions of residents?

Why do you think the Ukrainian war will develop into a nuclear war?

Why do you think that cyanobacteria can not be rapidly cultivated and become the staple food of mankind?

 

[jhungary]

Why do Hiroshima and Nagasaki always have millions of residents?

Hiroshima and Nagasaki are not a complete destruction. Nor were Japan completely destroyed, nor the world was completely destroyed. It is NOT the same case if we are talking about Global Thermonuclear War, if Russia or China have a nuclear exchange, the ENTIRE world is going to be razed. Not just 2 cities. You can still produce stuff in parts that were affected back in Nagasaki and Hiroshima, like in Tokyo but who can produce stuff when the entire world is destroyed? All the farm field were burned and irradiated, and all the livestock on the surface of the earth killed?

Just because Japan can build back Nagasaki and Hiroshima after they dropped 2 50kt bombs on it does not mean the world can build back after US and Russia both unloaded 1000 Megaton of nuclear material on it........

Why do you think the Ukrainian war will develop into a nuclear war?

This is a hypothetical situation on what happened after a nuclear war between US and Russia. I personally don't think Ukrainian war will develop into a nuclear war. I have said it many times.

Why do you think that cyanobacteria can not be rapidly cultivated and become the staple food of mankind?

Dude, did you study biology at all? Humans need a balance diet of multiple nutrients in order to sustain Sustagen. That include, Carbohydrate, Protein, Mineral (such as Zinc and Vitamin), Fats, Fibre and etc, does cyanobacteria have Carbohydrate? Does cyanobacteria have Protein? (probably it does) Does cyanobacteria have Fat? Does cyanobacteria have Fibre?

If not, then you will suffer from something called Malnutrition, and that is fatal unless you regain the balance of that diet.

Don't ask dumb question please, we can eat grass, does that mean we can sustain life just by eating grass?