What's new

Nuclear patrol in the Pacific to boost China’s own security

.
Please prove that China has the balls to make war with U.S.
As if US has ball to make war with China? Can any US politician gurantee not a single Chinese nuclear warhead reach American shore if USA fight a non irrelevant war in SCS for Philippine?

Or shall I say a SCS conflict can caused 100milliom American death , will most American agree to such war?

Chinese are forced to make suicidal nuclear patrols into Pacific Ocean due to limited range of its SLBMs

Latest operational Chinese SLBM JL-2 is 8000 KM range, which means China would have send its SSBNs upto North Pacific Ocean in order to target New York or cover most of USA.

n2fuj6.jpg



And this region is USN's playground, sandwiched between Hawai and Aleutian Islands.

This is very risky for Chinese second strike vessels being very vulnerable to USN ASW capabilities.

Even without sea deterrent, China land nuclear asset is enough to retaliate and wipe out whole US. They are burry very deep underground and cannot be taken out all even with nuclear. Sea deterrent is just an extra option, not a must but better to have and gives you more asset to threaten others and ensure peace.

Plus China HSV can gurantee 100% penetration of US missile shield. Will US date to play nuclear with China?
 
. .
As if US has ball to make war with China? Can any US politician gurantee not a single Chinese nuclear warhead reach American shore if USA fight a non irrelevant war in SCS for Philippine?

Or shall I say a SCS conflict can caused 100milliom American death , will most American agree to such war?



Even without sea deterrent, China land nuclear asset is enough to retaliate and wipe out whole US. They are burry very deep underground and cannot be taken out all even with nuclear. Sea deterrent is just an extra option, not a must but better to have and gives you more asset to threaten others and ensure peace.

Plus China HSV can gurantee 100% penetration of US missile shield. Will US date to play nuclear with China?
Yup what belong to China will be to China forever. China should built the Scarborough island faster, and put silo and mobile launch there. Phillipine will shut they mouth faster.
 
.
Ok good for India but China is not stupid. That why is NFU ( no first use) policy, and that it is why China keep building island and US only do child play. So both country is playing smart games here, they won't go direct war.
India also have No first use policy.. my post in response to the 3mt thermo nuke launch on to US mainland
 
.
Like @Beast says, nuclear patrol in the Pacific is not directed at the US or someone else, it is for the purpose of power projection and ensuring that China would have credible second strike capability.

No one in their right mind would initiate a strike against a nuclear-triad country. That goes for China, Russia and the US.

These days, everybody has no first use policy, although it was first articulated and announced by China well in the 60s.

From Wiki:

"During the 7th Congress of the Workers' Party of Korea in 2016, supreme leader Kim Jong-un stated that North Korea would "not use nuclear weapons first unless aggressive hostile forces use nuclear weapons to invade on our sovereignty".
 
.
The latest JL-2 version can hit 8000 KM with eight thermonuclear warheads, but when the payload is reduced with four thermonuclear warheads, then the range will also increase.

That's the common sense.
Can you provide me credible sources that that state JL-2 has 8 MIRVs
 
.
Can you provide me credible sources that that state JL-2 has 8 MIRVs

Google it, if you have Internet. Because you might said China media is not credible. Janes defense is a good site from US, more credible. I found one from IHS Janes defence site.

Originated From:People's Republic of China (PRC)
Possessed By:People's Republic of China (PRC)
Alternate Name:CSS-NX-4 (JL2)
Class:Sea Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM)
Basing:Submarine-launched
Length:13.0 m
Diameter:2.25 m
Launch Weight:42,000 kg
Payload:1,050-2,800 kg
Warhead:Nuclear, 1 MT or 3-8 MIRV with 20/90/150 kT warheads
Propulsion:Three-stage solid propellant
Range:7,200 km
Status:Development
 
Last edited:
.
China knew they cannot beat a single carrier battle group (total of 11) in conventional warfare with USA that's the reason they retorts to nuclear warfare.

But they forget the the USA nuclear arsenal have 10 time more than CHina with cutting edge technology, China will be erased on Earth before they can lunch theirs.:rofl:
 
.
China knew they cannot beat a single carrier battle group (total of 11) in conventional warfare with USA that's the reason they retorts to nuclear warfare.

But they forget the the USA nuclear arsenal have 10 time more than CHina with cutting edge technology, China will be erased on Earth before they can lunch theirs.:rofl:
Oh dear Phillipine, why you don't you use your Phillipine flag? Maybe only US has early warning radar? Do you know Russian has a tunnel called nuclear tunnels, do you think China will be standing aground to take all American nukes? You funny Phillipine..:nana:
 
Last edited:
.
If you launch Nuke into US soil .. that means inviting US missiles..
Its more of US trying to strike nuclear at China first thinking US can never get hurt by China.

China must let US know striking on China with nuclear will mean the destruction of US.

China knew they cannot beat a single carrier battle group (total of 11) in conventional warfare with USA that's the reason they retorts to nuclear warfare.

But they forget the the USA nuclear arsenal have 10 time more than CHina with cutting edge technology, China will be erased on Earth before they can lunch theirs.:rofl:

China has HSV while US do not have. I do not know what secret weapon US has more than China?

Even US admit HSV if deploy will make current US missile shield obsolete.

As if US can take the damage of ten 3 megaton strike on homeland cities? Current stockpile of Chinese nuclear arsenal is enough to destroy twice USA.
 
.
China knew they cannot beat a single carrier battle group (total of 11) in conventional warfare with USA that's the reason they retorts to nuclear warfare.

But they forget the the USA nuclear arsenal have 10 time more than CHina with cutting edge technology, China will be erased on Earth before they can lunch theirs.:rofl:

If this makes you sleep better at night, yes, your statement holds water. Lots of water.
 
. .
That's what the commie government told you, brainwashing you for a long time :bounce:

rubbish all talk no action! lately Indonesia busted your asses still no action :blah:

Not scared from made in China, it will fail before it land on us.:rofl:


The confidence is impressive. No wonder your country has grown so much in such a short time.
 
.
As if US has ball to make war with China? Can any US politician gurantee not a single Chinese nuclear warhead reach American shore if USA fight a non irrelevant war in SCS for Philippine?

Or shall I say a SCS conflict can caused 100milliom American death , will most American agree to such war?



Even without sea deterrent, China land nuclear asset is enough to retaliate and wipe out whole US. They are burry very deep underground and cannot be taken out all even with nuclear. Sea deterrent is just an extra option, not a must but better to have and gives you more asset to threaten others and ensure peace.

Plus China HSV can gurantee 100% penetration of US missile shield. Will US date to play nuclear with China?

Can China guaranteed that its 1.5billion population would be saved from U.S.'s ICBMs from its own ABM system? What about US version of the HSV that can penetrate China's ABM system. Waste of time for China to try that then eh? Don't think so.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom